trail wrote:
spockwaslen wrote:
How do they define "Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers" . Is there any objective test? Do they define a criteria in the bill?
RTFB!
It's defined in USC 2279. Still kind of vague in that law. But it's law that's been in effect for over a decade (with changes along the way) - the point being that they didn't just make up the term this month.
Well at least I have learned what RTFB is. Reading the definition it is pretty vague. Maybe we could refine it as people who feel they have been hard done by. Kinda subjective. At least with aboriginal one can go back and have some quasi objective criteria. I don't know how the blunt instrument that is the US gov't feels they can fix things under these kind of rubrics. As we have seen in another thread about unemployment cheques they can't even identify it they are paying money to real people.
They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot
Last edited by:
spockwaslen: Mar 11, 21 12:08