Originally published at: XLAB is Top Hydration Carrier in Kona - Slowtwitch News
The IRONMAN World Championships in Kona are notoriously hot and humid. Although this year’s race was gentler than average on conditions, it still reduced plenty of men to doing everything in their power to cool themselves off. Where do they usually start that problem? The bike. So it’s always been common to see creative solutioning to carry more and more fluid on board bikes, despite averaging an aid station every 11 miles.
There’s also, of course, the chase for aero benefits on front hydration systems. With the prohibition on using empty bladders down a tri suit, we’ve seen more athletes using a bottle in that space to try and fill the space between the arms and chest.
So it perhaps comes as a slight surprise that of the nearly 2,300 bikes that the collective team counted in Kona, only slightly more than half of them — 1,253 — had front hydration systems that we could identify. Rear hydration remains more popular, with 1,661 systems counted. And of those, there’s one brand that dominates: XLAB. They accounted for 42.2% of all the rear hydration systems, nearly doubling the count of second-placed Profile Design.
PD, however, outpaced XLAB on front hydration carriers, 412 to 315. But the most popular front solution was one integrated into the frame or bars from the manufacturer. I think this is something that we’ll need to watch for over the next couple of seasons, especially if Canyon continues its trajectory in the bike counts; any of their bikes will come with some type of front-mounted hydration either built into the frame (CFR, CF SLX) or with one available to purchase (standard CF).
Same with Quintana Roo and their V-PRi, which has an integrated FuelBay system. Both Profile Design and XLAB are helped by other QR bikes, though. Either a Profile Design or XLAB hydration system is offered as part of the purchase on the V-PR or X-PR bikes (the PD Aeria system is included, with the XLAB Torpedo a minor upcharge offering).
No other brand cracked a combined total of 100 carriers, either front or rear. The closest was Bontrager, which had 48 front carriers, 46 in the rear. And how the mighty have fallen, as Speedfil has just 5 total systems in the field, a far cry from their days as a major age-group team sponsor (and, in turn, showing up on the pier).
The totals:
| Brand | Front | Rear | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| XLAB | 315 | 701 | 1016 |
| Profile Design | 412 | 363 | 775 |
| Integrated / Manufacturer | 464 | 339 | 803 |
| Bontrager | 48 | 46 | 94 |
| Giant | 9 | 12 | 21 |
| Elite | 0 | 55 | 55 |
| Speedfil | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fizik | 0 | 62 | 62 |
| Tacx | 0 | 34 | 34 |
| Specialized | 0 | 49 | 49 |
Perhaps the most interesting statistic to me, though, are the roughly 630 athletes who eschew either a front or rear hydration system, relying instead on traditional frame bottle bosses (or their best Faris Al-Sultan impression). Was it a matter of budget, a lack of aero knowledge, or some other factor that led them there? We’ll need to keep an eye on this end of things as well, particularly if bike prices continue their march upward.
Photos: Eric Wynn / Slowtwitch
