Will There Even Be a 2027 Ironman70.3 Worlds or will they allow for deferal to 2028

I looked at around five July 70.3 races around the world. They don’t say anything about number of slots being offered (we know the location is still not announced) at a given race, just a generic statement about 2027 worlds that is vague (as one would expect before a location is set).

So we have no idea where the 2027 worlds is, or if there is 10, 20, 30 or more slots per gender at the July races. It almost feels like they are keeping it all vague enough that if they can’t get a worlds race up and committed for 2027, they can offer slots in July (or later races) and offer deferral to the subsequent year/s.

I think we would all prefer to know what we are racing for other than finish time and local age group awards (of course those at attributes of local events), but it may just be racing for finish times and age group placements in July.

Of course deferral to 2028 is also a question mark with the new Mayor of Nice fighting Ironman.


World Championship Qualification

Age Group Slot Allocation – How it Works

2027 IRONMAN 70.3 World Championship Qualifier Seal Badge

To accept a slot to the 2027 IRONMAN 70.3 World Championship, qualified athletes must claim their slot in-person at the Awards Ceremony & IRONMAN World Championship Slot Allocation / Rolldown Ceremony at the advertised time and location, as detailed in the event guide or event schedule. Photo ID is required to be presented, and payment must be made at this point in time.

How does the Age Group Slot Allocation Work?​

“Age Group” refers to a grouping of athlete peers based on their gender and age range. For example, ‘Male 25-29’ is one Age Group, and ‘Female 25-29’ is another. Your Age Group is determined by your age as at December 31 of the year of the IRONMAN World 70.3 Championship event.

“Age Group Athletes” is how we generally reference amateur triathletes (non-professionals) who have elected to participate in the race and earn a finisher time that is ranked against their peers. Most participants fall into this category on race day.

The Slot Allocation Process:​

Before Race Day:​

Each qualifying event is allocated a number of age-group qualification slots for men and, the same number for women.

  • From this allocation, each Male & Female Age Group is allocated one slot to be awarded to the Age Group winner. This is referred to as the “Automatic Qualifying Slot.”

  • All other slots available for the race are attributed to the Performance Pool, to be offered after the race is complete. These slots are referred to as the “Performance Pool Slots.” A separate Performance Pool of slots is maintained for men and for women so that slots remain equally split between genders.

On Race Day:​

The winner of each Male & Female Age Group will automatically earn a qualifying slot, (“Automatic Qualifying Slot”):

  • If that slot is not taken, it will roll to the second-place finisher, and then to the third-place finisher if not taken by the second-place finisher.

  • If the Automatic Qualifying Slot for a specific age group is not taken by one of the top three finishers, that slot is allocated to that gender’s ‘Performance Pool’ of qualifying slots that will then be offered to the next-most competitive athletes at the same event.

Once Age Group Winners have been offered slots following the process above, we move on to the allocation of slots via the “Performance Pool Slots”:

  • The finish times of all remaining athletes at the event will be compared to a benchmark (The IRONMAN 70.3 Standard) that is created by averaging the top 20% of IRONMAN 70.3 World Championship finish times over the past 5 editions for each age group (i.e., a global age-group standard for each gender and age group). By comparing each finish time to its age-group standard, we create an age-graded finish time for each athlete.

  • Athletes are then ranked within their gender, based on their age-graded finish times (i.e., their performance in the race relative to their own age-group standard); the athletes who are most competitive on race day relative to their age-group standard will rank highest.

  • Using this ranking of the most competitive athletes, slots will then be offered and allocated using a ‘first to accept’ roll-down process. This roll-down process will continue until all qualifying slots for the women’s race are allocated, and then for the men’s race (or vice versa).

Other Information​:

Only Age Group Athletes are eligible to receive Age Group World Championship Qualifying Slots. Athletes holding current Professional or Elite status with any World Triathlon Member National Triathlon Governing Body, WTC’s Pro Membership program or having raced as an elite athlete in any international events during the calendar year, are not eligible for Age Group Slots. Athletes may not at the time of the event, nor at the time of the IRONMAN World Championship event they qualified for, hold Professional or Elite status.

Any change in an athlete’s status prior to any event participation, or a qualified World Championship event, must be disclosed to IRONMAN (World Triathlon Corporation, WTC) immediately. Failure of the athlete to make such disclosure will be cause for disqualification from such event and may result in sanction from WTC Events.

Payment: ​

  • Credit Card Only (American Express, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Diners Club and Cash are not accepted)

  • Physical card including full card number, expiry date and CVV must be available​

  • Only one card accepted (split payment will not be accepted)​

The fact that it hasn’t been announced yet has me thinking it must be related to some problem. If it were Camp Pendleton, I could imagine the problem being all the levels of approval needed and the back and forth at various authorizations that’s taking too much time. But really this seems excessive.

So the flip side has me wondering if it’s some place where there is current turmoil in the middle east. I wouldn’t think so, that they’d do something like that ahead of Oman. But maybe there’s another place they lined up with political uncertainty recently occuring.

The last thought is we haven’t had anywhere in South America. Could that be a possibility?

To your post, I can’t imagine there not being an event at all. I could see them in extreme circumstances say they are still confirming final details with the city and will award slots via email at the seasons end. Not ideal, and will affect their business for sure, but it’s better than cancelling altogether.

I suppose they may do an email rolldown once they have a place announced, but knowing Ironman, they will want our money NOW.

So I think they have a few options:

Take our money onsite and say that we can use the slot at this year’s world’s in Nice or a to be announced next year’s worlds with no options other than go to next year’s worlds

Take our money now with the option of going to next year’s worlds with the option of deferring a year if the person cannot go to the location and place next year. They probably add fine print if they cancel 2027, you can’t get your money back but can either defer it to 2028 or get a credit to use at races globally (i’d probably take it if I know I can apply credit to other races because I will race)

Take our money now with the option of nothing else than next year’s world’s. This would quickly roll very far into the field and probably after the first weekend with races in Sweden, France and Canada, they would find out if this strategy is resulting in any uptake. As it stands, we see women slots roll through field from races in South and North America and remain untaken for Nice this year. Not knowing where the event is, will see more of this effect (I think)

1 Like

I’m wondering if it’s some combo of

1- The first option didn’t come through for whatever reason (could be as mundane as local city politics)

2- first or second option is taking it’s time (local politics being what they are)

3- they have their hands full making sure Nice is kept happy enough to get 2026 and maybe 2028 secure

When is the start of the ‘27 qualifying races? July?

1 Like

Yeah - I know Muncie’s website says it is a 2027 qualifier.

Musselman on July 12th is a 2027 qualifier

July 1 is the dividing line

Yeah, Muskoka, Jonkoping and Sable D’Olonne on first weekend in July is the new qual season. Largely nothing stops Ironman from just flipping slots over to Nice 2026 other than a few pissed off customers who registered for those races to get 2027 slots early. I suspect if they don’t have a 2027 race, they offer 2026 and you can choose 2027 also, but if you take 2027, no money back or option to defer. I’d take the latter or that credit applies to a race of my choosing

I don’t always keep up to date on the latest news on all the different WC’s these days. Was ‘27 suppose to be in Middle East, and so with those going ons currently, it’s been “debated” on where they potentially may move it too? Is that the issue of why no one knows where it is currently? I think Nice was going every other year so ‘26/’28?

I believe this is what the future locations are for 70.3 Worlds.

2026 - Nice
2027 - TBD
2028 - Nice
2029 - Oman

One thing I hadn’t considered that maybe Nice is rolling beyond the entire field and they are coming up short. So they might switch those races over to a Nice qualifier.

That would add some interesting fuel to the Nice politics if IM advised them behind closed doors they weren’t hitting their 70.3 targets.

Part of me wants to go back to questioning Scott’s leadership though. For all the praise he gets for being the likable PR guy, I mostly see someone making the easy don’t rock the boat decisions.

But in fairness he is dealing with a politician telling his constituents the city canceled his championship race. And missiles and blockades around his cash cow sponsor and other future worlds venue. So there’s likely a mountain of other junk he’s dealing with.

In think at some point he’s got to make the best possible nextdecision and if he’s delayed so long that the next best decision is to keep waiting and hoping…well doesn’t that come back to leadership questions?

1 Like

I wasn’t aware today is the first of June and ironman had missed its announcement deadline …

1 Like

Definitely a possibility of both. Option 1 fell through, and now option 2 is taking its time to go through local politics and approvals especially if they got started late.

I feel like they’re really trying to go somewhere new. Ironman probably could go back to somewhere that has hosted before like Chattanooga which was a bidder, and maybe they’re having to pivot there if their preference was somewhere else. Feel like they also could go back to Taupo given the success of 2024 70.3 worlds and IMNZ for so many years, but want to have it in NA and not Oceania.

I don’t think that they’d go that far down the road - the easier solution is just a “TBD - we’ll email you if you qualify once announced”

I signed up for Musselman 70.3 specifically to try to get in an early 2027 qualifier, and assumed that it is NA (part of that is on me, but DeRue has also said its NA). I chose to do Musselman over IM Ottawa as part of that process and would be at least a bit upset if they pushed the qualifying dates out.

Did they announce that? Either way, are you suggesting this is a good situation they’ve put themselves in to have their slot chasing customers on hold?

Maybe their location isn’t a great one and they figure it might actually discourage the slot chasers from signing up so better to surprise them last minute once they’ve already committed? That’s a shrewd move.

Maybe they don’t think about the slot chasers (doubtful as they presumably really want to sell those 5000+ slots).

When was it stated June 1 for an announcement deadline?

The only thing suggesting that was Kyle Glass saying “he heard” it would be announced sometime in May…..

We all know that typically the location is, at the very least, unofficially known by now.

this sums up this thread nicely, a dog that chases its tail lol

“Will there even be a 2027 70.3 Worlds?” Without question. It’s a huge money maker for Ironman. It will be somewhere in the US. @Lurker4, it won’t likely be Oceanside simply because of the two-day road closures required. Scott DeRue confirmed both of those rumors to me at Oceanside this year. Is the announcement late? For sure, normally we would know by end of April. I don’t anticipate going very long into June without a final decision. Could that effect July registrations for qualifying races? Maybe at the margins but not materially. The “slot chasers” are a smaller cohort of the overall registration group.

1 Like

Good info

While that is true, IM does place some value on it that way they load some events with more slots than others.

All else being equal, I’d have to guess no news means either a lackluster location they don’t want to depress any potential turn out among that smaller cohort of slot chasers. Or they are trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat.