I’m guessing his pool is also in yards and he just mis-spoke, thinking he told you yards, not meters. No way your times are the same and you suddenly were in 'slipperier water’.
Nope. I’m not buying it…
Love the spelling…
I’m with you, honestly. That makes the most sense.
But, he’s made a POINT of it. He has specifically said, “Remember, THIS pool is in meters, NOT yards.” And when I give him times from my pool he coverts them over to meters for his pool.
And you know… he’s in the Colorado Swimming Hall of Fame, 5x D1 All American, been the over-all winner of the Waikiki Roughwater Swim, the Alcatraz Sharkfest Swim, and the Lake Minnetonka 5-mile Open Water National Championship Swim. He holds Masters World and American Records in the 200 Butterfly, 1500 Meter Freestyle and the 10,000 Meters.
So, I sorta assume he KNOWS how long his pool is. Maybe MY pool is actually meters, I don’t know.
There are absolutely fast and slow pools. Here in Austin, the old Pure Austin pool (now “Lifetime Austin Arboretum”, I think) is slow. It’s shallow (4’-5’), tends to be warm, the lanes are narrow… and lane 4 (of 5) has pillars in it to support the platform above it. And the jets shoot in from the side, so the edge lanes are extra slow. On the other hand, Austin Aquatics and Sports Academy has a deep pool (not sure exactly, but >6’), wide lanes, is colder, is 50m/25y, has a better circulation setup, and no obstructions. I did my NYE 100x100 there, and it was SO MUCH EASIER AND FASTER than at Pure. I had longer glides, needed fewer strokes,and was quicker for a given effort. Going back to Pure felt like swimming in a washing machine.
Someone here will certainly tell me I’m wrong, but I’m not the only person to note that these two pools are at opposite ends of the speed spectrum.