SPM/Running cadence at a given speed/RPE/whatever?
Oh for frucks sake, why does this shit keep coming up.
Just run, your body will find it’s own natural cadence.
it’s bs too, otherwise taller people will always be faster
.
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
it’s just food for thought. Chill man!
Just in talks with some friends there is an idea that if you have a similar cadence going from the bike into the run, it will be more beneficial, as you won’t have to change the speed at which your legs turn.
For instance, a 90RPM cadence, would benefit a 180spm run, 80RPM cadence a 160spm run, etc. So, although we naturally select, one could argue that there could be a benefit trying to match the two together. rpm*2 = spm.
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
Actually it could be useful.
You are both doing the inverse between disciplines.
So either high run, low bike, or high bike, low run.
Which suggests that it may be optimal not to do ‘high/high’ or ‘low/low’.
Just a thought 
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
it’s just food for thought. Chill man!
Just in talks with some friends there is an idea that if you have a similar cadence going from the bike into the run, it will be more beneficial, as you won’t have to change the speed at which your legs turn.
For instance, a 90RPM cadence, would benefit a 180spm run, 80RPM cadence a 160spm run, etc. So, although we naturally select, one could argue that there could be a benefit trying to match the two together. rpm*2 = spm.
One COULD argue but do you actually have an argument to make?
I actually thought about this myself a few years ago at a time when my own typical cadence was extremely similar for both disciplines. I didn’t see any specific reason why they should be similar. They just were. Since then my typical cadences have diverged. My run cadence has increased very slightly and my cycling cadence has reduced while at the sme time I’ve become faster at both. So I’m not reading anything into it.
If you’ve got an argument, I’d love to hear it.
Sincerely. But I don’t see an obvious link or hear an argument.
My run cadence is 185-200 & bike cadence is around 84.
Not sure how those correlate, but my HR at 185spm is equal to my HR at a 84rpm cadence - @ 1.1/w to kg.
HR at 200 spm is equal to 93rpm at 2.0/w to kg
This discussion needs more Velotron.
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
Actually it could be useful.
You are both doing the inverse between disciplines.
So either high run, low bike, or high bike, low run.
Which suggests that it may be optimal not to do ‘high/high’ or ‘low/low’.
Just a thought
That’s an awfully small sample size to “suggest” anything.
Yes, this needs more velotron.
Also, I can tell a lot of the tri folks in here have never bike raced. There’s a really really big reason those guys hold 90rpm and 100rpm when they do. If it’s lost on you why they do that, then you don’t need to worry about it.
sorry, what I meant was. What if we try to dial in the cycling cadence by using our running cadence as reference?
Why?
If you do not already have a solid reason to believe there is a relationship between the two, don’t try and invent one.
Since you did not provide a reason, I don’t believe you have one.
I don’t think there is one.
Incidentally:
My typical cadence ranges are Run: 182-188spm. Cycling: 75-90rpm
My training buddy’s ranges are Run: 158-165spm. Cycling: 85-95rpm
How is that useful?
Can you see any reason to think one of us is doing something wrong by comparing the two disciplines?
Actually it could be useful.
You are both doing the inverse between disciplines.
So either high run, low bike, or high bike, low run.
Which suggests that it may be optimal not to do ‘high/high’ or ‘low/low’.
Just a thought
That’s an awfully small sample size to “suggest” anything.
Yup, that’s the ‘fun’ thing about the internet, you can talk shit as if it has validity (or at least a lot of people do)
This discussion needs more Velotron.
And 200mm cranks 
.
I have noticed a correlation in sprint races. A high bike cadence leads to a higher run cadence and faster run. In fact…I just did a 30 min warm up on the bike trainer at an average cadence of 106 and then raced…and won…a 5k. Set a PR as well. Average cadence on that run was 182 with a max cadence of 210.
Over the longer haul I could see a high/low or low/high combo worker as you are doing aerobic/anaerobic balance.
Physiologists know that muscle efficiency all comes down to the speed at which your muscles can contract. If you choose a gear and cadence that allows your muscles to contract at one third of their maximum velocity, you’ll maximise your power output.
Read more at http://www.cyclingweekly.com/fitness/why-amateurs-shouldnt-try-to-pedal-like-chris-froome-191779#e1XUEs6OWb1zS0O2.99
Oh for frucks sake, why does this shit keep coming up.
Just run, your body will find it’s own natural cadence.
This is what happens when engineers dominate a sport.
Yes, this needs more velotron.
Also, I can tell a lot of the tri folks in here have never bike raced. There’s a really really big reason those guys hold 90rpm and 100rpm when they do. If it’s lost on you why they do that, then you don’t need to worry about it.
^^^
Because not worrying about it isn’t for everyone.
This discussion needs more Velotron.
I got a fever. And the only prescription. Is more Velotron
Physiologists know that muscle efficiency all comes down to the speed at which your muscles can contract. If you choose a gear and cadence that allows your muscles to contract at one third of their maximum velocity, you’ll maximise your power output.
Read more at http://www.cyclingweekly.com/…#e1XUEs6OWb1zS0O2.99That’s a misinterpretation of the studies.
This discussion needs more Velotron.
I got a fever. And the only prescription. Is more Velotron
