Trans Athlete wins triple jump by 8 feet

They have the right to use the bathrooms that match their sex though

A legal right is simply a freedom or entitlement allowed to citizens as encoded in law. If people who meet all the other requirements have a different legal ability to serve in the military just based on whether they’re cisgender or transgender, then they don’t have the same rights.

Same with bathrooms.

1 Like

Do women have the right to use bathrooms without having to be in the presence of a penis?

Is rejecting a West Point candidate solely on the fact that he’s color blind a violation of a right?

The fact that we’re reading and talking about it means this isn’t true. These tend to be normal to slightly above average male athletes getting attention for crushing female athletes in female-only events.

The non-athletic male would himself be average to above average in most early age female sports, and probably less so as they age up.

To be fair it’s really not about the presence or absence of a penis. There are trans women that you probably would never notice in a busy female bathroom, Just as there are trans men who have a vagina that would cause an absolute panic where they to walk into the female bathroom on Capitol Hill.

It’s not about safety or the presence or absence of a penis, it’s about people’s comfort levels, and that will vary based on the appearance of the trans individual and not what’s between their legs.

Rejecting a West Point applicant based on color blindness might not be a violation of a right, but you could certainly say that color blind people don’t have the same rights as non-color blind people.

As to bathrooms, women clearly don’t have the right to use bathrooms without a penis present, as evidenced by all the mothers who bring their baby or very young boy children into the bathroom. I’d say that it’s pretty typically accepted that women have the right to use women’s bathrooms without men present. It’s a bit murkier as to whether they have the right to use women’s bathrooms without transgender women present, especially since some transgender women still have penises and some do not. That murkiness is why this is part of the national discussion.

It seems like it’s ok (in some people’s minds) that some people can be made to feel ā€œuncomfortableā€ while other people can never be made to feel uncomfortable.

Personally I don’t care who uses what bathroom. Here in California almost all public restrooms are ā€œgender neutralā€ (which results in women now having to deal with piss on toilet seats) anyway.

And I don’t care what standards the military uses for admittance. Were we disappointed that my color blind son was rejected from West Point? Of course. Do I think it’s appropriate to file a lawsuit or go on a national crusade for color blind ā€œrightsā€?

Not even a little bit.

I swear I thought he was a woman! I couldn’t tell. I swear!

I’m not gay…

…well maybe a little gay.

Maybe that’s ok for some people, but it’s not the discussion we’re having here.

this is routine in the ladies’, some moms teach their daughters to squat

It’s not gay if it’s with a woman. Or if a woman’s present. Or if you’re thinking about a woman.

Well that certainly opens up a lot possibilities.

It’s the discussion we’re having here now.

Yeah but that’s girl pee. Girl pee is good. Guy pee, not so much.

At least in my opinion.

What’s the difference between a chickpea and a garbanzo bean?

Of course. They have some rights. Indeed, they have the vast majority of rights. But not all.

is that a trick question

Setup for a joke.

okeydoke

what is the difference between a chickpea and a garbanzo bean?

I’ve never paid money to have a garbanzo bean on my face.

4 Likes

Access to government jobs and public facilities implicates peoples’ rights. The fact that we impose certain justifiable restrictions, such as your ability to do the job, does not mean that the entire topic is unrelated to peoples’ rights. Practically everything that we think of as a right comes with some legitimate restrictions. For example, it is commonplace to say that, depending on state law, a felon loses the ā€œrightā€ to vote. It would be odd to say that there is no right to vote because people under the age of 18 can’t vote.