Tim Don banned for 3 months for missing doping tests!

http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,,1922266,00.html

Don banned for missing dope test

David Martin
Saturday October 14, 2006
The Guardian

Tim Don, the world champion, has been suspended for three months by the British Triathlon Association after missing three out-of-competition drug tests. Don, who has been tested without adverse findings for drugs on nine occasions this year, will not appeal against the punishment.

The BTA and an independent disciplinary tribunal attributed the anti-doping violation “to a combination of forgetfulness on the athlete’s behalf and his lack of understanding of the new testing system”. The tribunal found that only a limited degree of fault could be attributed to Don and the breach was unintentional.

Don, the son of former Premiership referee Philip, was handed the minimum punishment, which became effective on September 27, the date of the hearing.

Don is the latest big name in British sport to fall foul of the “three-hits” rule on drug testing. Three missed tests over an 18-month period constitutes an anti-doping rule violation.

The announcement comes just over a month after the Commonwealth 400 metres champion Christine Ohuruogu was suspended. She was given a mandatory one-year ban under International Association of Athletics Federations regulations.

Don, like Ohuruogu, will be automatically banned from competing in future Olympic Games under the laws of the British Olympic Association, which issues life suspensions to drug offenders representing their country at the Games.

Don is the fourth British athlete to fall foul of the rule. Apart from Ohuruogu, the judo player Peter Cousins was banned for three months in January and the powerlifter Gillian Wright received a six-month ban in July.

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=1020953;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread

http://i9.tinypic.com/477y4xz.jpg

LOL
.

searched for ‘tim don’ and nothing special caught my eye shrug
.

…just messing with ya.

this is sad. It’s hard to know if he’s guilty of taking something or not. his story does make sense. But I wonder why he’s not fighting the olypmic ban? Was he not planning to take part in the olympics anyways? Does he have inside info that this bylaw will be removed?

Dan
www.aiatriathlon.com

You have to remember that many here on Slowtwitch are either in denial about doping in Triathlon or just don’t wanna talk about it. I think the Tim Don thread yielded 29 or so posts? The Frankie Andreu threads yielded about 200.

hmmm…

You have to remember that many here on Slowtwitch are either in denial about doping in Triathlon or just don’t wanna talk about it. I think the Tim Don thread yielded 29 or so posts? The Frankie Andreu threads yielded about 200.

hmmm…

than I shouldn’t start a thread with this news : Delay final results UPC Holland Triathlon

The results of the doping test during the UPC Holland Triathlon have made it necessary to do a contra expertise. Due to this fact the definite results of the race cannot yet be established. We expect that the cd-rom with all definite results (which every triathlete will receive) will be available in the middle of november. Payment of the pricemoney (all competitions and categories) will be delayed.

It’s hard to know if he’s guilty of taking something or not.

No it’s not. Anyone who misses 3 doping tests and then does not challenge it, is guilty, end of story. Would you challenge something if you didn’t do anything wrong?

Exactly. And if it was by be being lazy…after 2 missed tests i would be super-careful not to miss another one.

Maybe he was in a no win situation: be testeted and be potentially positive or miss the test and be suspended but leave his fans the straw that it was just by accident that he got suspendet?!

Axel

Is guilty of what? Of doping, or of missing 3 tests? There is a penalty for missing the tests, he has accepted the penalty, becasue there is nothing to challenge…Don has admitted that he DID do something wrong, i.e. that he missed the tests.

Let’s see.

He is a world champion and obviously a target for drug testing. If you fail a drug test, your career is going to be ruined. A missed test leads to a severe warning. He misses 3 TESTS.

Yeah, no problem there.

this is sad. It’s hard to know if he’s guilty of taking something or not. his story does make sense. But I wonder why he’s not fighting the olypmic ban? Was he not planning to take part in the olympics anyways? Does he have inside info that this bylaw will be removed?

Dan
www.aiatriathlon.com

He is fighting the Olympic ban, it is a sad fact that there are hundreds of athletes in the UK who have missed at least one test, and loads who have missed two, personally I don’t think they are out to hide anything, when you look at the case of TD, he was travelling internationally for two of them and at an athletics meet for the third, TD is very outspoken on the topic of drugs in sport.

Have a look at www.bbc.co.uk, where he has been interviewed , I hope he wins his fight against the Olympic ban.

I have known him since he first started the sport as a very young lad, and am 100% confident he is not on anything other than hard training and lots of that

NB

"No it’s not. Anyone who misses 3 doping tests and then does not challenge it, is guilty, end of story. Would you not challenge something if you didn’t do anything wrong? " Casey

I think this is abit harsh he is guilty of missing the tests not of actually testing positive. These are random tests so Tim Don would not have known that the testers would be there at those time. So it is not as if he went out of his way to avoid testing or to hide something. It is pretty easy to be delay by an hour - just try driving on UK roads! Only a minor degree of fault has been attributed.

I think on one occasion a track met that Tim was attending was delayed so he was an hour late getting home and missed the testing window by a couple of minutes.

From what I have read there have been some teathing problems with the new British system. From what I understand the only way an athlete could inform the testers of a change in there whereabouts was via the website. The problems have now lead to an oportunity for athletes to phone in changes, but htis informations has been poor advertised to the athletes. I also think the website has been difficult to understand. - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/sport/2006/08/13/sodrug13.xml here is an article on one of the athletes who has fallen foul to the new systems flaws.

I think this is abit harsh he is guilty of missing the tests not of actually testing positive.

A friend of mine was released by his Company for missing ONE scheduled drug test, without a legitimate reason. To even suggest someone could miss THREE without a reason, knowing his entire career is on the line is just too much of a “coincidence” for me.

He may be a nice guy and he may even have a really nice dog, but in the world of competitive sports in 2006, I don’t buy it for a second.

These are Unscheduled out of competition tests though, and lets face it many athletes are not always the most well organised (well I am not anyway). If sport UK and the BTA see no reason to suspect that there was any malicous reason for the missed test, without further proof I am unsure it is wise to suggest otherwise (- then maybe I am just to trusting). Hopefully though it will serve as a warning to other athletes.

I would be interested to hear what experiences the Pro’s that post on the forum have had with the “whereabouts scheme” or what other random out of competition testing scheme they have to follow) or is it only those on Olympic sports programs that have to follow this - i.e. not the long course athletes?

Try looking at the facts. He didn’t know he was being tested on those dates, and then try to avoid those tests. These are random, unannounced tests. He either forgot to update a database, or was delayed by circumstances beyond his control. It seems to me that the british system is flawed, as Don is not the only one having problems with it. There should be a reasonable standard of follow up by the testers to locate the athlete if the athlete is not where they are supposed to be per the database. (e.g. a phone call, everyone has a cellphone these days).

All I’m saying is, condemn someone for things they did do, not your wild-assed guess about what they maybe, might have done.

**Hopefully though it will serve as a warning to other athletes. **

I guess that is where I have my problem. It is very clear to every athlete that random testing is here. If there are so many athletes around that have missed one or two tests, you would think the athlete, with so much to lose, would make every effort to make sure they are where they are supposed to be. I can honestly understand missing one test, due to unforseen circumstances, but 3 times is stretching things a bit.

There was a huge uproar at the last Olympics when the Greek 200m runner missed a test and there is no way he did not know about it.

The other trend I have noticed lately is so many athletes coming out strongly against drugs. This serves a few purposes. First, they appear to be drug-free because of their strong stand and second, if they are caught, people automatically suspect a problem with the testing because “no one who is so outspoken against drugs would take them.”

There was a huge uproar at the last Olympics when the Greek 200m runner missed a test and there is no way he did not know about it.


The big difference in the case against the Greeks was that they were ‘WARNED’ to be in a particular place at a particular time to be tested, they then made off in a vehicle and allegedly had an accident.

In the Tim Don Case he did not know they were attending, he failed to update the computer database about his location for 1 hr , 5 days of each week, yes considering his livlihood was at stake, could have been very costly…his reputation has been tarnished, but I still believe him to be ‘clean’

In the Paper today it says that UK sport is comming under pressure to rethink the out of competition drugs testing after Tim Don’s tribunal raised concerns that the system could be punishing innocent athletes. It says that Tim Don is to appeal against the ban (but I think this will just be the ban on racing at the Olympics).