The $159 Running Shoe Experiment - Karhu M1

I’ve long been a fan of taking the road less fashionable, so when I say the Karhu shoes from the Craft site I was intrigued. What peaked my interest was that the shoes purported to offer the injury prevention of a cushioning shoe at a near racing flat weight. I was skeptical to say the least. But when someone from Craft offered to hook me up (I must admit that I did not pay full retail for these but they were not given to me, think employee discount) I jumped. As background, I have been running in Asics Gel-Kayanos for the past 4 years. I love them. Despite the fact that I am slight of frame, get a fair number of soft tissue injuries on my feet due to their bony nature, so I need some cushioning. After running for 6 weeks with the M1s here are my conclusions:

  1. My M1’s weighted slightly over 10oz vs. my last pair of Kayanos (weighed out of the box) at 12.8 oz vs. my Asics DS Trainer (same protocol) at 9.6 oz. Note: I could never wear a true racing flat at 7oz. - 8oz.

  2. The M1s are stiff and responsive, borderline too stiff. I tired them with the stock insole and my mild orthodics – not much difference. They have loosened up a fair amount but they are not for those who die for a mushy shoe.

  3. They are rather narrow, so you folks who did Carnac cycling shoes would not be happy picking up a pair of these.

  4. They do deliver substantial cushioning relative to their weight. They do feel like light weight trainers but cushion more like a structured cushioning shoe weighing 11oz. - 12oz. However, the do not deliver as much cushion as a beefy trainer (Kayano, Tangent, Trigon, etc.). They are sort of a “tweener”.

  5. I think these would be really good shoes for a slight overpronator who wants to shed a few ozs on race day but wants more cushioning that a flat for an IM mary. Over the course of a 2 hour run I do feel the benefits of the reduced weight.

Will probably get another pair of these and raced them at the half-IM distance.

wow
it just can’t be 129$ better then vitruvian

dirt.

You could say that about any shoe and the Vitruvian, but very few people run in them.

I don’t know if any running shoe has gotten better since 1980.

Dirt

The technical innovation in these shoes is from the 1970s. They just snazzed it up with some acronyms and bright colors.

Post: You could say that about any shoe and the Vitruvian, but very few people run in them.

Ouch! So how many people do you think run in Vitruvians?

I got away from running in Vitruvians when I developed PF.