just in general where does the concept that a prisoner need to be “reformed” to be able to vote come from?
I think Maine and Vermont allow prisoners to vote. I get the understanding that if you have completely disregarded the law (to be a felon) you have likely done something bad. But as a society arnt these all made up laws? especially when considering that we look into some laws stronger than others. If white collar crime was looked at more closely vs. blue collar, a different set of people would lose their rights to vote.
just in general where does the concept that a prisoner need to be “reformed” to be able to vote come from?
I think Maine and Vermont allow prisoners to vote. I get the understanding that if you have completely disregarded the law (to be a felon) you have likely done something bad. But as a society arnt these all made up laws? especially when considering that we look into some laws stronger than others. If white collar crime was looked at more closely vs. blue collar, a different set of people would lose their rights to vote.
Do you have a point or just writing random shit down?
They should be allowed to vote in and out of jail. All citizens should be allowed to vote.
Agreed. I don’t think the threat of having your right to vote revoked is a good deterrant, and I can’t see how keeping felons out of the democratic process would improve prisoner reform.
I think it’s the stupid puritan genes in American society that favors punishment. It’s a sick desire for others to suffer for not reaching a standard that society holds.
A tough part is the “clear” part for fines owed for some. Don’t do the crime I suppose if you wind up with $100k+ in fines getting out.
Not sure the answer there.
I was thinking of that. We don’t prevent other people with fines, those with judgments against them, etc. to vote. I can foresee some smaller subset of criminals who have restitution to pay for specific things but not all felons.
And it is not like gaining the ability to vote is going to prompt them to cough up the money. All it does is get Bloomberg to come down and throw some coin around.
How many of those people are felons due to socio-economic situations caused by political decisions? Shouldn’t they be given the opportunity to vote for someone who they feel can make a difference in those situations to prevent others from being caught in the same life, and limited to the same life choices?
So yes, felons (in jail, on probation, or time served) should all be allowed to vote. My decision comes after 14 years of law enforcement. Not being able to vote is not a deterrent. Ability to afford a good lawyer (or being in a position to make political donations) should not be a deciding factor in who gets to choose the future of a country.
How many of those people are felons due to socio-economic situations caused by political decisions? Shouldn’t they be given the opportunity to vote for someone who they feel can make a difference in those situations to prevent others from being caught in the same life, and limited to the same life choices?
So yes, felons (in jail, on probation, or time served) should all be allowed to vote. My decision comes after 14 years of law enforcement. Not being able to vote is not a deterrent. Ability to afford a good lawyer (or being in a position to make political donations) should not be a deciding factor in who gets to choose the future of a country.
By definition if you have been convicted of a felony and are in jail you have broken the social compact. Why should they be allowed to vote?
How many of those people are felons due to socio-economic situations caused by political decisions? Shouldn’t they be given the opportunity to vote for someone who they feel can make a difference in those situations to prevent others from being caught in the same life, and limited to the same life choices?
So yes, felons (in jail, on probation, or time served) should all be allowed to vote. My decision comes after 14 years of law enforcement. Not being able to vote is not a deterrent. Ability to afford a good lawyer (or being in a position to make political donations) should not be a deciding factor in who gets to choose the future of a country.
By definition if you have been convicted of a felony and are in jail you have broken the social compact. Why should they be allowed to vote?
Because in many cases, an argument could be made that laws were made specifically targeting certain demographics to put them in jail and keep them from being able to vote. Race, class, gender, all have been targets of politicians in the past, and many of the laws created for those reasons still exist.