I ve been a “roadie” for about 10 years and I ve always wore short with the big ole chamois. The other day I went out on the bike with a cheap pair of walmart shorts without a chamois, under my tights. I couldn’t believe how comfortable this was.
Are there any decent shorts out there without or with a very chamois. If so let me know what you like.
Almost all tri shorts have a pretty minimal chamois. But, if you’re looking for really minimal… I’d give Ironman Activewear a look. Their chaois is basically a very thin fuzz - almost no padding.
Please help me with the pronounciation of that word - chamois???
If you find a pair of trishorts with just a little piece of fleece over the seams, they’re the best I think, really comfy. I’d choose them over the real cycling"chamois".
The chamois (sham wah) is a kind of animal, a bit goaty, that lives in some of Europe’s mountains (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamois). The used to make leather out of the skin of this beast which was very flexible , soft and absorbent, for use in polishing things, including windows, and for protecting the crotches of cyclists. Now your crotch is as likely or more to be protected by a synthetic material (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamois_leather) - and cyclists in the English-speaking world tend to say shammy rather than shamwah! j
I second on Ironman Active wear shorts for cycling, but I found them not so good for running.
Thanks for bringing up the pronounciation issue, I would have made a fool out of myself reading this post in front of others, it is wierd word indeed!