Sam Long here... I want to know your opinion on T100 or Ironman Pro series financial comparison

Sam signed the T100 contract.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDuapdxvwyY/?igsh=MWE4bDM2M3h6M28wNw==

1 Like

I really had no doubt that he would come to this conclusion, it is right on so many levels…

Just read his comments. It makes sense in that is basically a “paid” motivation. I would caution to basically use that as a way to get faster, but don’t beat yourself up with the actual T100 results. This sounds odd- but actually use the T100 to sorta get better for the longer stuff, cus I just don’t know that he is going to get that much better of a swim within T100 to then have top T100 results. But he can certainly sorta “get faster” not necessarily have that equate to T100 success, but it put him in a better position in IM racing.

If he gets faster in the swim and then dominants T100, then obviously there is your answer. I don’t really know that “that” needs to be the “goal” because I don’t really know if that’s possible right now with where he is at + the dynamics of other athletes in T100. So T100 success imo for a guy like SL wouldn’t even be the goal. I’d use it more as a monthly measuring stick to see if the swim training is actually working esssentially because at some point SL is going to be more of an long course guy than an T100 imo (again I think his swim is just a little too off…the same reason we all said Wurf was a 1 and done ITU guy…if your too far back to be a real player, at some point it’s ok to pivot to a more successful pathway).

1 Like

Wow, i didn’t think he would choose that path. It’s going to be very fast and i don’t think it will end well for him. As a fan, i wish him the very best.

He posted a video

If I see this correctly, the only US race is Lake Las Vegas in Oct? The rest of the races are in Europe or Asia or Dubai?

It still leaves Sam with enough flexibility to do a number of 70.3s and 70.3 World’s in Marbella, because Marbella, is roughly on the path to Dubai finals from Arizona, so if you have to go to Dubai, you can go via Europe. And he’s already qualified for IM World’s in Nice in Sep which seems doable because after that he can sit around and recover and then do Lake Las Vegas (close to home) + Marbella + Dubai. If he does Nice, he just skips T100 Ibiza

2 Likes

Still a T100 race in SF but the 2025 Pro races aren’t listed and the AG race isn’t going thru T100 as it’s a stand alone race I believe.

1 Like

I guess you were probably right as Funk seems to have also signed on for another season

Didn’t he mention something along the lines of setting up a “home base” in Italy to make racing globally less disruptive? Could make the planning woes much simpler

Vancouver in June

What t100 should do to pay pros better and make the race more interesting, give primes for winning a split, but still finishing in top 25%. Same can probably win some .oney via bike leg

Any athlete who races in Marbella (70.3WC) a week before Dubai (T100 GF unless the GF is after and yet tba) is not giving respect to the T100 GF.
Iden, Blummenfelt to just name two will race Marbella as the culmination of their IM Pro Series campaign.
Long has contracted to race a minimum of 4 regular season plus the GF. And all those races score. If an athlete races more they have discards (and on 2024 form, Long will need to discard his worst). Better race an extra T100 than be distracted by random 70.3s.

Date Type Event Location
April T100 Singapore SNG
17-May T100 Cote d’Azur FRA
31-May T100 San Francisco USA
15-Jun T100 Vancouver Canada
02-Aug T100 London GBR
14-Sep IMWC IRONMAN World Championship – Men’s Race Nice, France
September tbc T100 Ibiza ESP
2025 (Oct?) T100 Las Vegas USA
16-Nov T100 T100(GF) Dubai UAE
1 Like

I think they are getting paid ok. Why pander to someone with a weakness just to appease him and his fans. The winner is the person who crosses the line first, they get the bigger money. Primes risk just causing athletes to race only to their strength and not fully race the entire event, I think we will get enough of that with athletes using these races as a tune up for their Ironman races they have stated they are targetting.

I think it will make the overall race faster. No sand bagging even though leader may have clear win. Knowing this everyone is a ticking bomb that may explode and not win the race ( as we have seen in kona this year with Sam Laidlow) . Bring back suffering!

Yes, in one of his YouTube videos after spending several weeks in Europe this year. His soon to be wife’s grandmother lives in Italy.

None, they have made things up as they go along in their entire existence, hence my not [in]famous cynicism.

But in theory that is the job of wetsuit bike and run sponsors …

1 Like

Well, the deadlines described for signing ‘gold’ contracts (top 10) seem to have had effect: a day later the PTO announced who had signed and who hadn’t.
We see that the OP signed: only Ironman WC top 2s didn’t.
So your cynicism for this small element (signing deadline) was misplaced.

1 Like

Haven’t thought this through, but it would be interesting is there was some sliding scale possible the prizes. First gets the full prize plus X amount of series points for every second they are ahead. Second place price is 90% of the first place price and starts losing money for every second they are behind. And you continue the sliding prize scale throughout the top 5.

So the San Francisco race would pay out very well to the top 3. Big blowouts would be more costly. T100 would be paying for solid broadcast performance.

The series points, I think, would deter first from slowing down out of kindness, and the sliding scale would encourage battles?

This
Addressing a problem which doesn’t exist.
Are you trying to deter athletes ‘going for it’ as Gentle did courageously, chasing Knibb in Dubai?
I, too, have no idea.