0 - 30 sec: I feel good but need to focus to get my rpm and pwr up to target
30 - 90 sec: I am working
90 - 150 sec: I am in a dark place barely hanging on
150 - 180 sec: I know the end is near and usually accelerate until the end, but couldn think of spinning for any longer
Recovery feels great first 60 seconds totally necessary, next 60 seconds don’t feel as useful, final 60 seconds I am psyching myself up for the next interval.
Will do 5 to 7 of these in anywhere from a 1:00 to 2:00 hrs session.
How would others describe their level of mental / physical suffering during such an interval?
I’m interested in the replies to this because I’ve been hitting these 3 min VO2Max intervals regularly on the TrainerRoad plan I’m following.
Personally I find a huge difference between hitting them at 115 vs 120%. At 115% they are tough but doable and I often find that with a good hard effort I’ll come in a few Watts over target, more like 117-118%. At 120% they are absolute torture and require a lot of willpower and determination to just barely gut them out. Those extra 10-15 Watts are very hard earnt for me!
Having said that, I think they really are as mental as physical. If I’ve had a bad day at work or something and go into a workout like this with a bad attitude, I know inside that I’ve failed before I’ve even started.
For me 3 min of 120% on the road is definitely tough, but doable.
Like Op the rest feels slightly long if 1:1 Int:Rest.
On the trainer I doubt I would survive even one …
Make them longer for greater benefit. You’re only getting about 90 seconds of VO2 effect on each. For myself, when I do a VO2 block I start with 6x3 but add 30 seconds to each interval every week.
I’m curious about interval length- I have often done 1min on/off x 30 at 120% and seen good results for sprint tris. I know some coaches even start out at 10x 1mins etc. with equal rest.
When I look at my HR curve each interval I see an inflection point at about 1.5". I think I will try and extend to 4" @115% keeping the (3"). I may also try to drop the RBI, then work back up to 120%.
This should increase the workload. I hope there is a positive adaptation.
In my view these are too hard. Object of VO2 max interval is to use as much aerobic capacity as possible and train heart and stroke volume. Going at 120% you’re probably using way too high a proportion of anaerobic work. Too much acidosis as well - that kills training effect.
Do these at 110-112% and you’ll get just as much training effect without the extra strain on the body. You can shorten the recover period a bit as well. Leave the very hard intervals to tuning up for a peak. In my case hammering my VO2max intervals brings on asthma. Knocked the level down to something sustainable and I got faster. I coach a couple of people every year and the biggest problem I saw was training too hard and a fetish for suffering. Changed up the levels to something more sensible and aerobic capacity improved.
The worst advice I have ever seen is to do your VO2max intervals as hard as possible.
Suffering is overrated. Train smart and leave the suffering for the last laps of a crit or that nasty crosswind section of a RR when everyone is getting guttered.
In my view these are too hard. Object of VO2 max interval is to use as much aerobic capacity as possible and train heart and stroke volume. Going at 120% you’re probably using way too high a proportion of anaerobic work. Too much acidosis as well - that kills training effect.
Do these at 110-112% and you’ll get just as much training effect without the extra strain on the body. You can shorten the recover period a bit as well. Leave the very hard intervals to tuning up for a peak. In my case hammering my VO2max intervals brings on asthma. Knocked the level down to something sustainable and I got faster. I coach a couple of people every year and the biggest problem I saw was training too hard and a fetish for suffering. Changed up the levels to something more sensible and aerobic capacity improved.
The worst advice I have ever seen is to do your VO2max intervals as hard as possible.
Suffering is overrated. Train smart and leave the suffering for the last laps of a crit or that nasty crosswind section of a RR when everyone is getting guttered.
Sure. I train to get faster, but secretly the suffering is why I cycle.
I love that feeling and mentally pushing through it. Have to think others are similar to me, and it sounds like OP
Coggan and others have 106-120 pct of ftp so dialing it down to 110-112 doesn’t seem wrong at all especially if it means you can get more work done
I believe 110 at 4 mins w 3 mins rest is better than 120 at 3 mins w 3 mins rest and I’m not sure 120 at 3/3 will add anything beyond fatigue and mental toughness
.
Coggan and others have 106-120 pct of ftp so dialing it down to 110-112 doesn’t seem wrong at all especially if it means you can get more work done
I believe 110 at 4 mins w 3 mins rest is better than 120 at 3 mins w 3 mins rest and I’m not sure 120 at 3/3 will add anything beyond fatigue and mental toughness
Granted, people have different abilities (hence optimized intervals and such), but there’s a huge difference between 3 mins at 120% and 4 mins at 110%. For 110% I’d expect something quite a bit longer, like in the 7-10 min range.
Shortening to half rest would help, but I still haven’t seen anything suggesting 110% at 4 mins is more beneficial/better than either longer or harder.
In my view these are too hard. Object of VO2 max interval is to use as much aerobic capacity as possible and train heart and stroke volume. Going at 120% you’re probably using way too high a proportion of anaerobic work. Too much acidosis as well - that kills training effect.
Do these at 110-112% and you’ll get just as much training effect without the extra strain on the body. You can shorten the recover period a bit as well. Leave the very hard intervals to tuning up for a peak. In my case hammering my VO2max intervals brings on asthma. Knocked the level down to something sustainable and I got faster. I coach a couple of people every year and the biggest problem I saw was training too hard and a fetish for suffering. Changed up the levels to something more sensible and aerobic capacity improved.
The worst advice I have ever seen is to do your VO2max intervals as hard as possible.
Suffering is overrated. Train smart and leave the suffering for the last laps of a crit or that nasty crosswind section of a RR when everyone is getting guttered.
None of the above is really correct. Only if you can’t complete the workout as prescribed might it be argued that you are going too hard during VO2max intervals. Far more common, in my experience anyway, is people not going hard enough. For example, if you’re not driving your heart rate to within ~10 beats/min of maximum during the earlier efforts, you’re not pushing things as much as you think (hard to get heart rate that high during the first interval, whereas due to cardiac drift you may end still end up in that region despite the intensity not being all that high).
I would generally lean that direction as well, for both theoretical as well as empirical reasons.
Alternatively, you could shorten the rest interval down to 1 min or so, to try to maximize the stress on the cardiovascular system. That would require dialing back the intensity of the work intervals a bit, though.
(BTW, anecdotally I think that part of the reason that Hickson et al. might have seen such a large increase in VO2max is because they apparently increased the intensity during each 5 min interval. IOW, instead of doing them isopower fashion, each interval was like a mini-VO2max test, finishing at/above a power that would elicit VO2max.)
I think the issue between 110% and 120% is to different people they may feel the same. What I mean is VO2 Max is very trainable. If you haven’t done any in a long time your ceiling may be at 110% for the duration, within say 6 weeks the same pain and suffering may have you at 120%. I gave this example as I recollect reading that you can get a ~10% bump in 6 weeks or so…
Ymmv