TT,
Whenever I do an analysis of a nutritional strategy, the 1st thing I look for is what I call *red flags or anything that stands out. *Often it’s a relatively easy fix as we identify this *red flag, *make the correction & the issue is resolved. Other times, we need to dig into greater detail to determine how best to correct the issue.
As such, lets look at your current strategy & switch from Accelerade to Perpetuem to see what the potential red flag may be. I’m going to make the following assumptions for this example (using roughly equivalent caloric amounts of Accelerade & Perpetuem on a 3hr ride):
PERPETUEM
**CAL: **715 (238 per hr)
**CHO: **148g
**Sugar: **19g
**PRO: **16.5g
**Sodium: **635mg (212mg per hr)
**Potassium: **429mg
**Magnesium: **30mg
Accelerade
**CAL: **720 (240 per hr)
**CHO: **126g
**Sugar: **120g
**PRO: **30g
**Sodium: **1140mg (380mg per hr)
**Potassium: **390mg
**Magnesium: **799mg
Looking at the above & the issues you’ve had w/ what could be characterized as an excessive urination, my initial speculative guess would be this *could *be caused by the significant difference in electrolytes between the (2) products. The only other variable which could be deemed significant between these (2) powders is the sugar content which wouldn’t have any impact on your urination rate…unless of course this was having an impact on the amount of fluid you were absorbing, but I doubt that to be the case.
If we look at the (3) primary electrolytes (sodium, potassium & magnesium), during this hypothetical 3hr ride, you’re looking at a total intake of:
Perpetuem: 1094mg
**Accelerade: **2329mg
So, when switching from Accelerade to Perpetuem, you consumed 55% less electrolytes, assuming a similar calorie intake. Is this the reason you peed 5-6x? Maybe.
Whether it be training or nutrition, it’s always a process of trial & error as what works for one athlete often doesn’t work for another. With that, in the above example, you’d be looking at just over a 200mg /hr intake of sodium which I would characterize as EXTREMELY low. Even in the Accelerade example, 380mg /hr would be considered low, but much closer to what I consider a borderline acceptable range.
So…what does all this mean?
If I were you & you’re set on using the Perpetuem, I’d strongly suggest simply bumping up the electorlyte content on the next go-around & see what the impact is. If on subsequent rides (notice I say rideS as you never want to use a single ride/run as a benchmark), you increase your intake to the 500mg /hr mark (for example) and the frequent urination is decreased, problem solved.
Anyway, I hope that helps to potentially resolve this strategy, but please drop me a line if I can offer any additional assistance.