Part One: Unlocking Speed on the Bike

Originally published at: Part One: Unlocking Speed on the Bike - Slowtwitch News

When I present on time trial (TT) bike fitting, I always start with a simple question:

“If I gave you a hat or visor to run in that would save you 45 seconds per mile, would you wear it?”

The answer, obviously, is YES!

While gaining “free speed” in running is rare (super shoes)—this is not the case for cycling. And, by “free” I don’t mean monetarily free, but free in a sense that by optimizing your bike position, equipment, and nutrition setup, you can ride faster without an increase in form or fitness.

Why Free Speed Matters

In a triathlon, over half of the event duration is spent on the bike. During this time, roughly 80% of our energy is used to overcome fast-moving air, road friction, and other resistive forces. Most of this resistance comes from the rider’s body and the reason we fold ourselves over into the time trial (TT) position—to reduce aerodynamic drag, achieving the most speed for a given effort.

Understanding this concept has shifted the conversation away from the once-polarizing debate of training more vs. buying fancy aero equipment. Today, serious athletes know they need to check all the boxes: proper training, race execution, bike position, and equipment.

Buying a set of fast tires doesn’t mean you can take the week off from training. However, by optimizing your bike position and setup, you can significantly boost your performance—without additional fitness gains.

The Three Pillars of Speed

Achieving free speed rests on three foundational pillars:

SPEED = Comfort + Power + Aerodynamics

If these pillars sound familiar, that’s a good thing. Over 15 years ago, Todd Carver (Retul Co-founder and current Head of Performance at Specialized Bikes) and I introduced these principles during our first time-trial-specific bike fit course for Retul University. While reasonably apparent, we identified that the foundation—and ultimate goal—of the time trial position is SPEED, built on three key pillars.

Since then, these pillars have caught on, influencing the marketing and positioning of numerous products across the cycling industry. I’ve applied them with athletes ranging from recreational riders to pro tour cyclists, age-group triathletes, and world champions. Let’s break them down:


1. Comfort

The ability to sustain your position for the duration of your event.

A good TT position starts with comfort. Comfort is relative to the individual, and those new to the position may find it unnatural at first. However, the unique thing about the TT position is that it is highly adaptable.


2. Power

The ability to apply force to the pedals without restriction.

The goal is to position the rider and their contact points (saddle, bars, and pedal/shoe interface) within a range of accepted biomechanical norms to allow freedom of movement and optimize muscle function, maximizing pedaling efficiency.

While it’s difficult to objectively measure power changes during a bike fit, the goal is to give the athlete every chance at success—i.e., to apply force to the pedals.


3. Aerodynamics

Optimization of frontal surface area and shape to reduce aerodynamic drag.

Reducing aerodynamic drag is the final goal of the fit. I’ve spent hours testing athletes in wind tunnels and velodromes, and making major changes to their position to chase a lower drag number requires a delicate balance. I carefully assess the trade-offs, knowing their position is already optimized for comfort within their biomechanical limits. I ask myself, Can the athlete adapt to this change?

Often, small tweaks—like adjusting head and arm position, elbow width, or hand height—can yield significant aerodynamic gains without compromising comfort or power. Additional factors, such as helmet selection and bottle placement, also play critical roles.


Bringing It All Together

Optimizing these three pillars—Comfort, Power, and Aerodynamics—unlocks your potential for free speed. Each pillar supports the others, ensuring that your bike position and setup maximizes your performance.

In the next article, I’ll dive deeper into the first pillar of speed: Comfort.

Stay tuned!

—Mat

3 Likes

I agree. Comfort is king.

Earlier this year, I found a 2011 Cervelo P2 for a very reasonable price. I picked it up on a lark. Before buying, I did a test ride and it felt really good. After I got it home, I did some basic fitting and took it out for a longer ride. Originally, the ride was supposed to be about 35 miles. But it only took about 6 miles before I discovered I was going to have to cut that ride significantly shorter.

A previous owner had cut the steerer tube down to where the stem was the only thing that fit. I assume he/she was looking to slam the front to get more “aero”. While I have no doubt it was more aero at that height, it was simply intolerable for any length of time.

I ended up putting a different fork on it with a longer steerer tube that raised the cockpit up about 1.5-2". Made all the difference in the world.

Now, on my primary race bike, a 2015 Shiv, I had that pretty well dialed in. Or so I thought. I had done quite a few rides in the 50-60 mile range and I would never say I was truly comfortable on the bike for long distances, I would say it was at least tolerable.

However, when I did IMAZ a couple weeks ago, I barely made it to the 1/3 way point and I was already experiencing noticeable pain in the saddle. It was literally a pain in the ass. While I think the wind was a bigger factor, by the end of the ride, my sit bones hurt so bad I know it added time to my ride. I kept trying to remember to sit up when I had a tail wind and maintain my aero when I had a head wind. But the head wind segment was so long, I just couldn’t maintain that position for more than about 10 or 15 minutes without giving my sit bones a couple minutes to rest.

I still haven’t figured out why my bike was so uncomfortable seemingly all of a sudden.

Tri presents a unique challenge in that after your super fast bike ride…ya still gotta be able to run. Ignoring pacing, comfort/ergonomics can present a definite curve ball to bias the triangle of those three things more to comfort.

You can be “comfortable enough” for even a 50mi time trial and make great power and have great aero…but even if dialing it back on the power to conserve for a run your ergonomics might be bad for a run after.

For a triangle of comfort, power, speed for a 40k TT I think you can get more aggressive on “comfort” if you mean comfort with consequences for later in that you can fall off your bike onto the grass beside the road and crawl back to your car. Can’t really do that with a triathlon.

I had this argument back and forth two years back in this forum with a guy but it’s fundamentally different. I dabbled in duathlon and the one that I did was a small local one and I did modify from my 40k TT position given the two 5k runs. This was from experimenting with hard brick workouts shorter than 5k 40k 5k, but trying to see how I could run on that second run after a bike.

It’s just hard to describe but for the du I ran the bike a little less hip angle and little less crazy shoulder shrug/turtle because doing the normal TT thing I just felt crap on the second run in workouts.

Try an ISM saddle, or other split nose saddles. Will help alot.

I have an ISM. I think it’s an earlier gen. Still doesn’t work for me. I have found others that are much better. Just picked up a Sella from a member here. Haven’t even had a chance to give it a try yet though.

I’ve been looking at the Ergon SR Tri Front saddle. My wife has an Ergon saddle on her MTB and it’s the only saddle that hasn’t been an issue for her. Tree Fort Bikes has them for a pretty good price if the Selle doesn’t work.

Surely this order of operations depends on the rider. The top pro riding 4h tops isn’t going to prioritize comfort to the same degree as the the MOP 6h bike split. Ditto for aerodynamics. The faster you go, the more you power you can lose in exchange for aerodynamics. Add to that for long course that losing 10w of power for 15w of aero also saves you 150-200kcal of work.

Well…this assumes that comfort comes fully at the cost of aerodynamics. But for the 4 hour guy - it’s SUPER critical to be able to hold the position for the full 4 hours - comfort would be king if not in a slightly different sense? I do get the percentages moving around but comfort might still be the most important. A 6 hour rider can come out of aero with less penalty at slower speeds if they are uncomfortable.

I get what you are saying - but it’s not like you can be willing to sit on a cheese grater just because you are “only” on a bike for 4 hours.

I get what you’re saying as well and I think we’re converging on the same thing. It’s just degrees. Like an aero tuck is not the most comfortable way to ride a bike. If it was then beach cruisers would come with aero skis. So we’re already starting at a baseline of kinda uncomfortable.

If comfort is defined as “being able to hold the position for the duration of the event” then more agreed. I’m still hesitant to view it as the #1 thing in position setup. Spend a month riding the trainer in TT position and reevaluate if it’s uncomfortable after that. With aero data collected first then you can decide what level of discomfort is worth it.

1 Like