OT: Vacuum Cleaner Review: Dyson DC07

http://www.cyclonicvacuum.com/dc07-all-floors.html

http://www.cyclonicvacuum.com/images/DC07_allFloors_side_tall.jpg

Well, I got my new vacuum cleaner: A Dyson DC07. Here’s the day one report:

I bought a “Factory Remanufactured” DC07, Dyson’s least expensive vacuum. It was $279.99 with free shipping via Fedex ground and no sales tax.

I was seeing this vacuum around local retailers, new, for $399.

The vacuum arrived in 6 days to Dearbon, Michigan, well packaged. The contents were complete and factory sealed- the vacuum appears new out of the box. There are no visual cues that it is “Factory Remanufactured”.

Assembly was completely straightforward. I did read the sealed owner’s manual prior to assembly. That was important as it may not be intuitive, but the instructions are excellent.

Assembly took less than two minutes. Interestingly, the instructios for opening the box, which actually are important, are inside the box. Hmmm.

First use: I vacuumed two days ago completely with my old Eureka bag unit. I usually vacuum either once a day (upstairs) or every other day. One of my cats is a long-haired so that is somewhat necessary. I am also a neat-nick.

On the first use the vacuum is maybe 40% quieter than my previous unit. That’s nice. Doesn’t scare the cats as much. Good.

Very powerful suction. Much more so than previous unit. Picked up noticeably more debris and hair. One note: The clear containment vessel for the dirt picked up is genius marketing. You see the dirt and cat hair coming into the containment vessel. In a bag unit you didn;t see how much stuff you were picking up. Even in a relatively clean house there is a substantial amoutn each time you vacuum, but in a bag unit it doesn’t seem like as much since you don;t see the stuff. So, when you suddenly see this little pile of stuff swirling in there your reaction is like, “Holy shit! look at all that stuff! Am I glad I got this vacuum!” The truth of the matter may be that it is exactly the same amount as another vacuum, but since you can see it, it seems “better”. Genius.

The unit itself is heavy, not too manueverable and will not go under furniture. It is certainly ungainly. A bit like wheeling a SCUBA tank around your living room. That said, the cord is adequately long for most larger rooms and the attachment hose, which I have yet to use, seems rather long also. So you can reach almost anything.

In general, the unit seems good after the first use. It is easy to empty and seems to clean somewhat better than the previous vacuum. I like the looks of it but it is unweildy and very “plasticy” in feel- no metal whatsoever. That leaves somewhat of an impression of cheapness until you use the unit, then you see it works powerfully and effectively.

Overall, quite good. A little paradigm shift from the previous metal vacuum, but it sucks up the dirt, requires no bags, has a cleanable filter and is easy to empty.

For $399.99 I consider it expensive, but at $279.99 for an excellent, factory remanufactured unit, it is quite good based on the first use. So far, I’m happy.

Thanks for all the suggestions and insight as usual.

Yeah, but how well does it fit?

And how much weight can you save by going to a carbon handle? Would it be easier to push with a disc?

Another piece of great British ingenuity and design even if it is made in the Far East.

Don’t blame me, I voted for the German engineering Miele (but you get what you pay for)
.

You should have waited, Tom. The new Dyson DC07 Carbonne Ultralight is about to be unveiled…

http://members.cox.net/steves6/DC07C.jpg

You know, it’s funny you mentioned that. I’m a short guy, 5’9" on the dot. The darn handle is made for a guy 6’ tall. The angle of your arm as you use the vacuum is angled too far upward- as you push the vacuum forward- and I am not idding about this- it makes the steering too responsive. Also, it is top heavy.

Honestly, and again being totally serious, I thought to myself, “Damn, this thing handles like a road bike with aerobars…”

So it’s too steep. Tweak it.

The handle needs to be 3cm shorter and the wheel base at least 2cm longer.

But somtimes you just gotta leave things alone.

Marketing genius or not, I think you should wear a respirator when emptying the clear dust container, or so says consumer reports. They seemed to give the dyson series fairly weak reviews.

You should have bought a Nilfisk, no handling problems at all and even midgits can use them.

I saw that. I emptied mine outside in the trash can. The one thing I recall about Consumer Reports is that I give them relatively low reviews. As a consumer magazine they rate rather poorly. The Consumer’s Union testing protocol for a (in)famous mountain bike review they did about 15 years ago included subjecting bikes to a “ladder drop” and gauging their survivability.

Now I don’t know about you, but throwing my MTB off a step later is not one of the preformance parameters I look for.

Ever since I have taken their opinions and, ahh, “tests” with a grain of salt.

We have two, count 'em, two Dysons - a yellow one and a purple one - one for downstairs, one for upstairs. My husband likes them so much I got him the purple one for xmas - and he loved it!! Go figure. He’s a bit of a neatnik himself.

I think they’re easy to push and handle (and I’m 5’2"), what I don’t like is the hose thing. It’s hard to maneuver because it has a long section that isn’t flexible. But overall, I like it. I like the clear canister, too. It provides instant gratification to see what you’ve actually vacuumed up. You can pick a section of carpet that looks clean, vacuum it, and see that it was actually loaded with cat hair/dog hair/various crud. They are expensive, though!

I easily had enough cat hair to make a new cat if I had the inside parts.

Yeah, I agree CR’s reviews are far from perfect. (I don’t subscribe. I just wish there was a magazine on how to live in the modern world with as few possessions as humanly possible.) But about CR, at least we have some confidence that those folks have not been bought off (literally or figuratively) by corporations and/or advertisers. Plus, I love how they make fun of various advertisers’ naked lies on the last page.

That is true, and I do read their reviews, espeically on things I know nothing about- which is most as it were.

Now you know why vacuum cleaner salesmen use the dirt trap thingy. It is a small canister that you cna put a filter that looks like a flat coffee filter in. You let the people use their vacuum then you use yours.

For a very short time (just long enough to get one for free as a sales prize) I sold Kirby’s when I was in college. The look on people’s faces when you sweep right behind them was great. Then you hit their furniture, or even better, their mattress.

I’d still have to say that the Kirby is probably the best one out there but for well over a grand it is beyond expensive. Though mine is 18 years old and still sucks like the first day.

A vacume clearner review? Dude you are sooooo single!! :slight_smile:

Tom why didn’t you get an “Animal” version of the Dyson?

Bikedude…

In researching it the only thing the “animal” version had that the DC07 didn;t have was a “pet hair” attachment brush. I don;t ned that for anything- any cat hair I would encounter is on the floor.

Wait a month, and you can get it with a Hed Disk rear!

http://img158.exs.cx/img158/4616/vac6zp.jpg