From the cycling news article…
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/no-more-facts4lance
Lance’s lawyer claims that the site is no longer needed since, “the centrepiece of the ‘60 Minutes’ allegation has now been completely destroyed."
What did I miss?
From the cycling news article…
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/no-more-facts4lance
Lance’s lawyer claims that the site is no longer needed since, “the centrepiece of the ‘60 Minutes’ allegation has now been completely destroyed."
What did I miss?
Lance’s lawyer claims that the site is no longer needed since, “the centrepiece of the ‘60 Minutes’ allegation has now been completely destroyed."
What did I miss?
Apparently they killed Tyler Hamilton!!!
I think this was more of a defensive move with spin, i.e. no one is believing the site so it is only making it worse.
This is akin to Ben Fertic’s apology for Ironman Access program where he tried to spin it that the program was not a money grab and it was to decrease wastage of spots which is complete BS because if they wanted to do that a Transfer Program like what Rev 3 does is much more efficient and effective. Not surprisingly, just like the Ironman Access info pages were removed from the site, so was Ben’s video after he was called out on his lame spin.
Yeah, Lance decided it was time to stop messing around and hired Paul Bergrin as his lawyer!
Sometimes it feels like Lance hired The Onion guys to write his rebuttals.
Oh maybe they really took it down cause people minds are made up one way or another and nothing that’s said there will chnage anyone’s opinion as to what he did or didn’t do. I know mine is made up. But then I wouldn’t have declared victory when taking it down. Would have just said why.
They took it down because it made them look like desperate chuckle-heads.
Sometimes it feels like Lance hired The Onion guys to write his rebuttals.
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/lance-armstrong-wants-to-tell-nation-something-but,17973/
-Scott
.