Newton Review: Great Running Shoe, Maybe not a Good Triathlon Shoe

I have the Newton Distance. This is the racer version for neutral male runners. I have good biomechanics already and am a forefoot striker who impacts directly underneath me.

I have completed two runs using these shoes: a long, slow 90 minute run and a fast fartlek+mile at 10k race pace workout.

These are really great shoes - forget about the lugs a moment. They fit great and the uppers are a very flexible, breathable mesh. The stiching and craftsmanship are at least as good as the major manufacturers out there. They also feel very light on your feet and feel less like a shoe than like a comfortable sock.

On the 90 minute run I ran in the free socks that were sent with the shoes. At first I found the lugs annoying and wishing they weren’t there; walking in the shoes felt like walking in my biking shoes with cleats on. It felt like there were rocks stuck to the bottom of the sneaker. After the first mile, however, my form adjusted for them and I didn’t notice them. For my long, slow distance run, my pace was noticably faster according to the Forerunner 305. At the end I also felt very little exhaustion.

Two days later I did a track workout of a fast 20 minute whistle fartlek at threshold and then I did a mile at 10k pace. The shoes felt fast. It was hard to slow down enough to run at the 10k pace. Again, I didn’t feel exhausted after the workout as I normally would expect to.

For the track workout, I decided not to wear socks and see how the shoes held up. I don’t use socks for triathlons because I don’t want to deal with the delay of putting them on either after the bike and especially not after the swim. I DO use socks for standard road races like marathons and 10ks.

Unfortunately, these shoes left a hot spot - almost a blister had I run further - on my right instep (but not on my left, oddly). This is because there is a pretty ragged exposed seem on the inside of the shoe.

I have a three or so pairs of shoes that I can run in without socks: Nike 2:45s, Nike 2:40s, and the Nike Spiradons (x2). All are nearly new with less than 40 miles on them. Unfortunately they are all discontinued and the ones I race with, the Spiradons, only last about 150-200 miles.

I wonder if any of the triathletes they have endorsed will wear them sockless at races? Maybe I am unique in the friction they caused my inseem, or maybe the athletes take the time to put on socks for the run or have enough callouses (on the inseem?)

I look forward to doing a 10k on Sunday with these shoes but am unsure about replacing my aging or my relatively new pair of spiridons with these for the upcoming tri racing season.

I did sprint with 'em (the Distance S) Saturday, went barefoot, and did not have any problems. I planning on wear 'em for FL 70.3, but will do so with socks. A half mary is a long way to run if they start to rub.

Another good Newton review. Interesting. Thank you.

I would be interested to see if they sell a wide to compete with the Kayano, which is my shoe of choice now…

Bob

Anyone else have any anecdotes on these shoes ? I was interested but do they they do everything they say they do ?

Two short runs so far. My forefeet really like these shoes but it took me a mile or so to get used to not having so much shoe (comparatively) under my heel. I kinda didn’t trust them at first. I laced them too tight to start with but Danny got me straight on that issue and I can now operate shoe laces competently again.

I use socks for every distance tri including super sprints. People scoff. I takes me less than 5 secs to put them on. Squirt the insides with baby powder - you’ll be able to whip them on quickly in T-1. Do the same for your shoes and they’ll go on quick too.

Squirt the insides with baby powder - you’ll be able to whip them on quickly in T-1. Do the same for your shoes and they’ll go on quick too.

Does that really work?

-C

it has worked for me for 5 years. I learned it from a woman I met at the swim start of my first triathlon. Her name was Ginger and she was super nice, encouraged me and gave me all kinds of tips. She also won the tri overall that day.

You can also roll the socks inside out but I found that giving them a healthy squirt it all it takes and they slip right on. Try it in your driveway if you are still skeptical.

Any calf pain/soreness/issues? Seems like the “lugs” would contribute to this. Interested to hear. thanks.

Nope - but I am a very efficient runner to begin with. I also have what are probably the best calves you’ve seen in your life.

Normally you are really suppose to ease into these shoes.

5 seconds per sock, two transitions ~ 20 seconds…first of all, I don’t believe that it takes you 5 seconds, secondly do you realize how hard it is to take 20 seconds off a 10K split?..that’s 2 seconds per kilometer, or put it another way, how long does it take to close a 100m gap on the guy in front of you running almost the same speed…likley more than 5K! There is no downside to running without socks in racing if you do the same in training…but you have train sockless often! To me, this seems like less work than trying to shave of 2-4 seconds per kilometer :-). Also when your feet get wet from aid stations or rain, you aren’t carrying around a whole whack of ounces of rotating weight…why use racing flats if you are going to weigh em down with wet socks…

He’d only change socks in T1, not T2. That would be 10 secs max, but I think he meant 5 secs total with both socks. Seems REALLY fast, but if you practice enough it might be possible.

“Unfortunately, these shoes left a hot spot - almost a blister had I run further - on my right instep (but not on my left, oddly). This is because there is a pretty ragged exposed seem on the inside of the shoe.”

I had the exact experience (right shoe only) but with socks on. To be fair, Newton agreed to exchange the shoes for new ones.

DP, not 5 seconds per sock. Honestly, how big are your feet that it takes 20 seconds to put on socks? After 5 yrs I am good at it. You don’t have to believe me, or actually even try it yourself…all I am saying is that you don’t have to give up socks during a race if you don’t want to. I would have no idea how long it takes to run some guy down in a race since I am a chick.

I’m not a terribly efficient runner and I havn’t had any calf pain at all.

I get this on occasion in other shoes - one shoe is fine and the other gets a blister somewhere- and a bad one.

I think this may be due to one foot being slightly, slightly longer than the other.

I will have to re-evaluate the shoe to see if it’s me or it.

Tightey, 10 second lead is still 25-50 meters depending on speed :-). The time it takes to run down a guy or a chick assuming they are running the same speed would be the same…I am not sure that Einstein inserted a gender related coefficient as the speed of the triathlete approaches c :slight_smile:

I’ve had hot spot issues with some shoes but it went away after it broke in. Putting a band-aid on the hot spot area helps quite a bit. Also, like another guy said, it may just be that shoe. When I got a new pair of the exact same shoe I had blister problems with, it wasn’t an issue at all. It felt perfect from day one.

I’ve run 4 times on them for a total of 27 miles and a long run of 16. My lower legs have felt much better since making the switch & my turnover has improved noticably as well. My main motivation for trying them was to try out the injury prevention claims. The day after the long run, my legs felt pretty good as well.

Regarding the seams, I’ve had trouble on the outer seam of the left shoe, causing a pretty nasty blister on my left pinky toe. I’ve been so happy with the performance so far, that I’m willing to work on them to see if i can get the rubbing to go away. They’ve felt really good so far otherwise.

The footbed is somewhat narrow. As soon as (if) I solve the seam problem, I’m hooked.