Matt Gaetz-Come on down!

Funny how that one never ended up in the Qanon folks’ playbook… Well… even if they missed it, surely they’ve grabbed on to it and run wild by now, right?.. Or maybe, this echoing and conspicuous silence could ALMOST lead you to believe that it was all just a bunch of politically motivated hacks regurgitating these sloppy lies because they knew that the dumbest people in the world would happily latch onto anything that could be used to demonize their political opponents… Of course, that would make everyone "we-should-be-looking-into"ing those lies monstrous humans or absolute dupes… Definitely not the sort of people who should be major influences in a quasi-legitimate political party… So we MUST be missing something here…

I’m really, really hoping that our collective societal memory doesn’t allow anyone to pretend all the things that were said and done by people between 2015-2021 were excusable, or things that shouldn’t permanently and irreparably harm people credibility.

So claims are he travelled with her (assume airplane) and paid her way. To get on an airplane requires birthdate in your ticket request. Assume under 18 she didn’t have her own credit card. Guilty as charged, he knew her age.

They were simply together to discus Russian adoptions

You know what, go ahead and just believe you can simply assume that a female drinking an alcoholic beverage in a public establishment is more than enough for you to know she is 21. Try that with the judge too when it turns out she was 17. Report back with your results.

Come on man, you know what he is saying and why he’s saying it. There has to be some responsibility on the part of the minor at this point. A person can’t read someone’s mind and know their age. He’s not saying it’s right, he’s not saying anything about Gaetz one way or the other, he’s making a point that there should be some responsibility if a person has done all of their due diligence.

There really isn’t. Have sex with someone who is a minor, get charged, go to jail. All of the burden is on the adult. Hazards of chasing after people on the cusp of adulthood.

Some states have distinctions based on how much older someone is. So if you are less than 5 years older for instance it is a lower offense than if you are Matt Gaetz’s age. Of course the vast majority of cases are never prosecuted because the underage person actually wanted it to happen and no one knows or doesn’t care. It is when you piss off the parents, or in this case the FBI when they are investigating one of your close allies, that you get sent to the pokey.

I guess it just screws with my sense of justice. You want to go after people who are knowingly doing something wrong or else you’re really not protecting society. Going after someone who is duped into a crime they had no idea they were committing makes zero sense to me.

Do you know if your BAC is .07 or .08? Sometimes it is on you to know even if knowing isn’t very easy.

I get where you are coming from, but the whole goal of the law is to protect young people, even if it is against themselves, and the responsibility lies on the adult, even if they are as dumb as Matt Gaetz.

Oh, and statutory rape laws are different from the federal sex trafficking law we are talking about. A majority of states have an age of consent for sex under 18. I think the sex trafficking law is about transporting people under 18 for the purposes of having sex with them, which is what the ally of Gaetz, Joel Greenburg, was being investigated for.

Summary of statutory rape laws - https://www.cga.ct.gov/.../rpt/2003-r-0376.htm

Just to be clear, nothing I’ve said refers to Gaetz. I’m not defending that guy, or actually anyone :slight_smile:

I guess I just don’t see how you’re protecting young people by prosecuting someone who wasn’t interested in having sex with a minor and was in essence tricked into doing so? I would assume the normal route for the guy going after minors isn’t to hook up with them in bars.

This is somewhat similar to mike Vick. He got in real trouble for transporting dogs across state lines to fight. The federal laws would not have applied. (I think the state laws for felonies at the time were that the dogs had to die. Whereas the federal crime was just transporting the dogs to commit a crime).

Someone REEEEEAAAALLLLYYYY needs to go through this guy’s Twitter with a bucket and a mop to scrub it clean.

ETA the link, because the recent replies are pretty good - https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/897946853437833217

gaetz2.jpg

He is describing ignorance that sex with a minor is a statutory offense and consent of the minor or other factors really do not come into play for a defense. So, ignorant of the law…

He’s not describing ignorance of the statute. He’s talking about being lied to about the facts such that you don’t think you’re committing a crime.

I think we all get that if you just didn’t know sex with a minor was against the law, that’s no defense.

I think we all get that if you thought the minor was able to consent, that’s no defense.

Thisisit is talking about a situation in which the defendant reasonably thought he was having sex with an adult, because he was lied to by the minor.

That’s not ignorance of the law.

Lied to about the facts? Really?

How many people do you know that used fake ID’s?

I amend my statement. Straight up ignorance. That is all. Not just of the law, just straight up ignorant.

Part of the case against his buddy was making fake IDs and stealing out of state IDs that were to be shredded.

This situation happened to one of my roommates in college. This was in the late 80s so the laws now could be way different than they were then. We were at a music club which was 18+ to get in. Everyone was carded and it was the local PD working the door. One of my roommates picked up a girl and ended up taking her home and having sex. Turns out she was 15. This girl was at the club with 1 of her friends. They both had fake IDs. Turns out they were legit IDs, but belonged to their older sisters. They even had their sisters’ school IDs (from the same college as us). They knew the campus, knew professors names, and a bunch of other details to make their fake IDs believable. They looked and acted like they were college students.

This girl’s father somehow figured found out what had happened and went to the police. Local PD arrested my roommate and processed him through to arraignment. Ultimately they chose not to prosecute. They repeatedly reminded him that they could have if they chose to, but due to the circumstances they thought it was just as likely he would be acquitted by a jury.

Let’s be clear, Matt Gaetz is a POS. Nothing reported on him would really surprise me. Curious to see what the facts end up really showing in the end. It is a bit of extra humor if they were making fake id’s for the underage ladies they were romancing though. Next level ignorance right there…

My hunch is that they found communication where Gaetz was “ordering” ID for the underage victim.

Twitter never disappoints! The best:

When they arrest you, do you think your entire head will fit inside the mugshot? Or do they have to put the camera in panoramic mode?

I’m still surprised that it was an under aged female and not an under aged male.

My hunch is that they found communication where Gaetz was “ordering” ID for the underage victim.

I wonder if his sex trafficker buddy flipped on him.

I’ll swap stories with you. There was a 47 year old high school teacher who ended up having a “sexual relationship” (emotionally manipulating & raping) a 14 year old female student who came from a tough home life. The case was prosecuted as statutory rape. The teacher was found guilty, but at sentencing Billings, Montana Judge Baugh ordered a 30 day sentence because the girl “appeared older” than she was. Not long after that, the girl committed suicide. Judge Baugh was censured and retired in shame.

For many crimes, there is the actus reas and *mens rea *elements that must be proven for conviction. Actus reas is conduct which is a constituent element of a crime. *Mens rea *is the intention or knowledge element of a crime.

Strict liability crimes don’t have a *mens rea *element. These crimes don’t require any intent or knowledge on the part of the offender. Statutory rape is a strict liability crime.

And this is why they repeatedly told him they could prosecute if they were so inclined. This was a bit over 30 years ago. I suspect if this happened today this would have gone much differently for him.

Anyone wonder if his motives in supporting Trump was because he was hoping for a pardon? They seem to have a lot in common, so maybe he just saw Trump as a father figure. LOL

So I think the story is as follows

Gaetz paid underage hookers for an orgy

Pictures were taken

In exchange for a pardon (what about the state crime?) Gaetz pays 25MM

The 25MM is used to fund a mission (or payoff) to rescue Robert Levinson who was/is being held in Iran

This deal was being brokered by a former DoJ employee

This makes my head hurt and if true would make a great movie.

He’s still going to jail for banging underage prostitutes

Tonight, Joel Greenberg - former Republican elected official and Matt Gaetz’s child-sex-trafficking wingman - was arrested yet again and hit with yet another superseding indictment with an additional 21 charges.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/crime/os-ne-joel-greenberg-indicted-again-fraud-bribery-20210331-omhpckhhfjh6xcbubeydlhaiie-story.html

Tonight, Joel Greenberg - former Republican elected official and Matt Gaetz’s child-sex-trafficking wingman - was arrested yet again and hit with yet another superseding indictment with an additional 21 charges.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/...eydlhaiie-story.html

It always shocks me when public servants boldly commit so many visible crimes expecting to get away with them

Tonight, Joel Greenberg - former Republican elected official and Matt Gaetz’s child-sex-trafficking wingman - was arrested yet again and hit with yet another superseding indictment with an additional 21 charges.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/...eydlhaiie-story.html

It always shocks me when public servants boldly commit so many visible crimes expecting to get away with them

Now I’m curious if this “friend” is actually the person behind the extortion plot (assuming that plot actually exists).

It had to be someone who knew about the investigation - and who would know more than the guy who was already indicted? And much easier to extort someone if you already have the receipts in your pocket.