Louis Theroux’s most recent documentary, The Settlers, aired on the BBC in April and is available on iPlayer. It revisits the Israeli settlement movement in the West Bank, more than a decade after his earlier film The Ultra Zionists.
The approach is observational, with minimal narration. Theroux interviews a range of ideological settlers, including Daniella Weiss, who articulates her vision of Jewish sovereignty over the West Bank in overtly religious and political terms. Palestinian perspectives are included briefly, with Issa Amro appearing in Hebron, but the focus remains on the settler worldview.
A few points to pre-empt the usual detours:
- Criticism of Zionist ideology is not antisemitism. The film does not criticise Judaism or Jewish people. It examines a political movement with state-level influence. Many Jewish individuals, in Israel and abroad, oppose the expansionist views depicted.
- The statements made by settlers in the documentary are consistent with their public positions. Weiss, for example, has long advocated permanent control over the West Bank and has dismissed the idea of a Palestinian state outright.
- The depiction of settler violence is grounded in fact. The film includes footage of a settler shooting a Palestinian protester. Incidents like this are well documented by human rights groups and the UN, which reports more than 1,300 Palestinians displaced due to settler activity in the past year alone.
- The influence of the settler movement on Israeli policy is not speculative. Senior cabinet members, including Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, are either settlers themselves or direct ideological allies. Policies enacted since 2023 have shifted administrative control in parts of the West Bank from military to civilian settler leadership.
- Scenes in Hebron accurately reflect current conditions. Palestinians live under restricted movement, surrounded by checkpoints and military patrols, while small settler enclaves are heavily guarded. This has been verified by journalists and observers on the ground.
- The documentary does not attempt to explain the entire Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It is a focused examination of one ideological current and its impact on the ground.
In response to common counterpoints, a list of past peace proposals is often circulated : 1947, Camp David, Taba, Olmert, Trump. These are real events, but their summary often omits crucial context. Offers to Palestinians have frequently involved fragmented, non-contiguous land, conditional sovereignty, and ongoing military or border control. Some were rejected outright, others lapsed due to Israeli political changes. In some cases, no formal rejection occurred at all.
Both sides have missed opportunities. That is true. But there has also been a consistent asymmetry of power, and the definitions of “statehood” offered to Palestinians have fallen well short of genuine sovereignty.
For those who have watched it, I would be interested in your impressions.
Did the film’s restraint sharpen its message or dilute it?
And does giving these voices airtime help expose the ideology, or normalise it?
The film is also available to view here:
https://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/louis-theroux-the-settlers/
(Link shared for access only. This does not imply endorsement of the site or any other content it hosts.)