What he said is correct. Saddles, wheels etc are very easy to see but power meters very difficult because of visual limitations. So surely bunches were missed
At a quick glance, it sure looks like there’s some kind of major screwup with this part of the count. The power meter count significantly underrepresents what they show in the pedal count.
Yes, this is what I think, too. But does this mis-categorization account for 50% of the 58% of the non-power meter crowd? That’s still a lot of women not using power data.
And if the power meter count is wrong, what other data points in that count are inaccurate?
Having watched a few mins of the power meter count this year (like, 4 bikes worth), it was super easy to see how this count is going to be very rough. I don’t know how previous years worked, but essentially, there’s no slowing down of athletes as they pass by. And I watched it just 15 mins before bike check closed, with just a drip-drip trickle of athletes.
Essentially the people doing the counting have to do so from a distance, outside of a chute (on just one side). Thus, the athletes simply walk by inside the chute, and then you have to count. That’s silly-easy for bikes or wheels, but incredibly difficult for power meters. An athlete can walk by with their bike blocking the entire crankset area. Or 3-5 athletes walk by together in a cluster, not stopping. Or, an athlete has a left-only power meter by 4iiii/Stages/etc, and that crank arm is simply not visible from the right side due to the random position it was in (since, the counters were on the right side).
I don’t really blame the counters per se here, they’re in a spot where Ironman hasn’t given them access to do the count properly. This isn’t hard, all it would have taken was proper access on the other side of the barrier, and simply asking the athlete to pause for 3 seconds. I feel like when I saw Kona counts in the past (photos of it), the people checking were allowed to actually inspect the bike up-close.