Ironman or Iron-Distance? A Triathlon Branding Battle Brews

Endurance Race Planners Puzzle Over How to Draw Crowds Without the Ironman Seal
By
FREDERICK DREIER
June 2, 2014 7:05 p.m. ET
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/PJ-BV153_NOIRON_G_20140602145927.jpg
Big Island, Big Race: Ironman triathlons offer a chance to compete in the famed event in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii.

The Ironman triathlon coming to Chattanooga, Tenn., in September sold out 2,500 slots in under a minute.
The Hits triathlons feature races exactly as demanding: a 2.4-mile swim, 112-mile bike and 26.2-mile run. The events have averaged just 30 registrants this year.
It’s hard to see much difference between the two beyond the logo.
As Ironman races swell in popularity in North America with more weekend warriors competing, rival races are popping up. They are finding, though, that it can be hard to attract competitors without the name Ironman, even with lower entry fees. Meanwhile, the Ironman series, run by World Triathlon Corp., which owns the Ironman trademark, has ballooned to 35 global races, many with waiting lists.
Kem Akol, a real-estate agent in Santa Cruz, Calif., decided to organize an event of his own and build a business out of it after completing his 28th Ironman triathlon. Given the demand, Mr. Akol believed that athletes would flock when race registration opened in March.
Since he couldn’t call it an Ironman, he named it CapitolaMan, after the nearby town of Capitola. As of Monday afternoon, only 36 athletes had signed up. “We’re going to have a good time, no matter how many people show up on race day,” Mr. Akol says. “I’m still optimistic.”
Triathlon veterans have numerous explanations for why the Ironman brand dominates the field—this year it will have more than 85,000 entrants.
There’s an advantage to being the most established player in a market. But the simplest reason is likely the power of the brand name. Some triathletes, it seems, have little interest in propelling themselves across 140.6 total miles of water, pavement and trail if, when the arduous journey is completed, they cannot attach “Ironman” to their name. Many triathletes colloquially call the newer races Iron-distance or full-distance.
Andrew Messick, World Triathlon chief executive, attributes Ironman’s success to multiple factors, from each race’s course design and location to the festival-like production. “I think that 20 years ago an independent director could get away with throwing some cones out on the road and get people to race,” Mr. Messick says. “If someone is going to train every day for six months, they expect a certain level of quality.”
The 2013 Great Floridian triathlon in Clermont attracted only 117 finishers, and 144 completed Maryland’s ChesapeakeMan triathlon last year.
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/PJ-BV154_NOIRON_G_20140602151720.jpg
Boutique Endurance Event: The Vineman has capped entries at 700. Eduardo Sturla biked in the 2013 race.

“Ironman sells out races and the rest of us struggle,” says Tom Struzzieri, president and chief executive of the company that oversees the Hits series, which includes Iron-distance races. (The events also include races of other distances that have drawn larger crowds.)
There are exceptions. North Carolina’s Beach 2 Battleship triathlon festival attracted 698 registrants at the full distance, and the Vineman full-distance race in California’s Sonoma County capped its registration at 700 last year.
One strengthening competitor sits outside the U.S. The Challenge Family series of triathlons organizes a 4,000-person Iron-distance race in Roth, Germany. Challenge Family is entering the U.S. market this year with races in Atlantic City, N.J., and New Albany, Ohio.
Felix Walchshöfer, chief executive of the Challenge Family, says he doesn’t expect to overtake Ironman in number of races or “market dominance,” but he wants to give triathletes another choice.
Still, most other Challenge Family full-distance triathlons are smaller than the average Ironman race. None of the other independents approach the 3,000 participants that Ironman often gets. Russ Pugh, director of the Vineman, says he didn’t reach his numbers overnight, either—the race has been around since 1990.
“For eons it seemed we could never get more than 300 ,” he said. “If you want to have the biggest, greatest race in the world, it’s not going to happen at this distance.”
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/PJ-BV155_NOIRON_G_20140602151411.jpg
Sebastian Kienle placed third in the 2013 Ironman World Championship in Hawaii.

Further helping its dominance, the Ironman series rewards its age-group champions with an entry into the famed Ironman World Championship event in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. For many triathletes, earning the ticket to Kona is a lifelong dream, though fewer than 3% qualify each year. Ironman races also throw postrace parties, lavish dinners and awards ceremonies.
The first Ironman was held in 1978 in Hawaii, and it gained fame in the 1980s after repeatedly appearing on ABC’s “Wide World of Sports.” World Triathlon Corp. was founded in the 1990s and began licensing out the brand name. It is owned by a private-equity fund.
There’s also the self-promotion that comes with finishing. Some Ironman participants tattoo the brand’s logo on themselves, while others promote their status with gear—Ironman now sells $500 million of branded merchandise each year, World Triathlon Corp. says. The company employs a lawyer whose sole responsibility is protecting the brand from unlawful use, according to Mr. Messick.
“We don’t want an athlete to get confused and think they are doing an Ironman” when they compete in a rival race, Mr. Messick says.
Alison Davies, an account manager in Toronto, says the overall organization at the Vineman triathlon was comparable to what she’s seen at Ironman races.
Ms. Davies, who qualified for Kona in 2013, says she was attracted to Ironman after seeing a runner with the logo tattoo at the 2010 Boston Marathon. Now that she has completed five Ironman events, she hopes to do more independent Iron-distance races, to try something new.
“You want to do the branded race first, because it may be the only one you ever do,” she says. “After you’ve done a few, what does it matter if you’re doing an Ironman or an Iron-distance?”
Independent races can sometimes be tougher than an Ironman. The Norseman Xtreme event in Norway begins at sea level and finishes atop a 6,000-foot mountain.
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/PJ-BV156_NOIRON_G_20140602151624.jpg
Dirk Bockel won the 2013 Challenge Roth event in Germany.

Steve Behler, who manages a construction company in Santa Rosa, Calif., says he struggled to complete the Vineman race through wine-country hills. For him, finishing Ironman Arizona was comparatively easy.
Mr. Behler says the atmosphere at the races was different: “Vineman was more laid-back. It was about having fun.”
The promotional power of Ironman and Challenge greatly outweighs that of Mr. Akol, who has been crisscrossing California in his car this spring, pitching his race at various triathlon club meetings and races.
Mr. Struzzieri, who also participates in his Hits Iron-distance triathlons, says he has given up fighting the brand, even in his personal life.
"When friends ask me why I’m training 30 hours a week, it’s just easier to say ‘I’m training for an Ironman,’ " he says.

I thought it might come to this.

Kem Akol, a real-estate agent in Santa Cruz, Calif., decided to organize an event of his own and build a business out of it after completing his 28th Ironman triathlon. Given the demand, Mr. Akol believed that athletes would flock when race registration opened in March.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/2529342/nelson-laughing-o.gif

Here is the link to the article:
Ironman or Iron-Distance? A Triathlon Branding Battle BrewsEndurance Race Planners Puzzle Over How to Draw Crowds Without the Ironman Seal
http://online.wsj.com/articles/ironman-or-iron-distance-a-triathlon-branding-battle-brews-1401750109?google_editors_picks=true

Having finished 5 branded and DNF-ed 1 non-branded I definitely see a difference, but the location/time of year would be the determining factor for future signups not the brand.

I think if you are only going to do 1 do a branded, but once you realize you aren’t Kona material(i’m not) what is the purpose of paying more to race the same distance.

I did like a few laughable lines in the article:
Ironman races also throw postrace parties, lavish dinners and awards ceremonies.
Give me a break. I enjoyed the laidback nature of the IMAZ breakfast awards ceremony, but every pre-race dinner made me feel like cattle being led to the slaughter. You should hear the pre-race spiel once, but don’t bother ever going again.

I am glad marathoning and ultras don’t have the dominant player as I like the variation.

The legal team for the WTC can attack all the races it wants. I’m pretty sure that any athlete completing a 140.6 distance by any company will say that they did/ are an Ironman.

I think it all boils down to weather you want big event with all the spectacle, or a nice quiet day by yourself.

“athletes would flock when race registration opened in March.”

It is disappointing that this race may fold before it has even started, but not surprising when you open registration in March for an event in September. Most Ironmans are booked +1 year out. I would have booked this race, but I’m already commited to Vineman and will only attend one iron distance event per year.

Spot on. Funny how the WSJ picked up on the legal bullying of the WTC.

I do 2-3 Ironman events each year and have also included a May HITS 70.3 the last two seasons as well. The HITS events are a refreshing laid back alternative to IM. I will continue to participate in both but will go out of my way to support any competitors to the WTC. With as much well deserved venom as there seems to be towards the WTC, it has to be a matter of time before serious rivals gain an equal footing.

I personally agree with what I have heard Macca say numerous times on his podcast… Ironman is a distance, not a brand. Yes, I understand that WTC legally owns the term Ironman, blah blah blah. If someone does a USAT certified race with the 2.4,112,26.2 distances, they are an ironman, period, regardless of what company happens to pay for the road closure permits. When Ironman started, it was a distance, just like a marathon is a 26.2 miles by definition regardless of who is promoting the race. Just my opinion.

I do also agree with what others have said, and my first IM in 3 1/2 weeks is an IM branded race. My second however, will depend on where and when I want to race again.

With as much well deserved venom as there seems to be towards the WTC, it has to be a matter of time before serious rivals gain an equal footing.

I’m not sure about that. I think an analogy can be drawn between WTC and the UFC. UFC had one big competitor (Pride FC) but they were in Japan. There were also several other companies that grew when MMA started to get really popular about 10 years ago. Many of those companies either had some of the best fighters in the world or actually stole them from the UFC with the lure of higher pay.

Some of the companies:
Pride
WEC
IFL
Strikeforce
EliteXC
Affliction
WFA
DREAM (Japan)

The UFC ended up buying most of the companies on that list. They put the others out of business. Bellator is the only fighting promotion that offers any kind of competition to the UFC and that competition isn’t remotely close.

The UFC has no rival in MMA. I’d have to say that WTC has no rival in LC triathlon. Challenge has its foothold in Europe but the rivalry isn’t close anywhere else.

Why? Even community college and online Marketing 101 courses define a target market and identified needs/wants.

WTC has THE LOGO. WTC has THE KONA which is no big deal except that it means THE TELEVISION SPECIAL. As if, if you participated in any WTC event then you’d be somehow linked to IRONMAN. Even further, if you buy brandless tissues you still tell yourself and let people around you know that you’re using KLEENEX. Triathlon = Ironman to 99.9% of the general public. But deep down you would want to WTC yourself for self-validation. Obviously this still carries weight with families (orphaned spouses), friends, and the water cooler… but most importantly, the mirror.

Answer: Vanity and bragging rights

If you read your Triathlon History, the original twelve triathlon disciples in Hawaii agreed that they would call THE WINNER the “Ironman.”

Today, we award THE TITLE by gender and age-group and even the “exclusive” sub-17. Wallah! Lots of Ironmen.

Not that I completely disagree, but UFC is about spectators, while triathlon is about competitors.

In my opinion, it’s the draw of Kona. Ironman races get the best racers, both pro and AG, because of the opportunity to qualify for Kona. It’s that atmosphere, being on the “real” stage, that is the big draw, I’d assume, of the “casual” IM racer. If someone is going for one and done, they want to play on the biggest stage they can get.

I have never done a WTC Ironman. I’ve done some of their 70.3s. I’ve done Rev3, small local, big local, etc. For me, it’s all about the competition. I can find plenty without having to shell out the race fees and travel costs associated with an M dot. If I get fast enough to go for Kona, then I’ll do WTC…but not because of the lavish dinners or the crowd support.

That’s the cool thing about USAT nationals. You can qualify at any USAT sanctioned race.

If Kona became similarly structured, WTC would plummet…just my opinion.

With as much well deserved venom as there seems to be towards the WTC, it has to be a matter of time before serious rivals gain an equal footing.

I’m not sure about that. I think an analogy can be drawn between WTC and the UFC. UFC had one big competitor (Pride FC) but they were in Japan. There were also several other companies that grew when MMA started to get really popular about 10 years ago. Many of those companies either had some of the best fighters in the world or actually stole them from the UFC with the lure of higher pay.

Some of the companies:
Pride
WEC
IFL
Strikeforce
EliteXC
Affliction
WFA
DREAM (Japan)

The UFC ended up buying most of the companies on that list. They put the others out of business. Bellator is the only fighting promotion that offers any kind of competition to the UFC and that competition isn’t remotely close.

The UFC has no rival in MMA. I’d have to say that WTC has no rival in LC triathlon. Challenge has its foothold in Europe but the rivalry isn’t close anywhere else.

I think that is a good comparison and analysis. Agreed 100% that WTC has no viable rival in LC triathlon. Hell, there isn’t really even a “strong” #2…Challenge is a distance second. The proof of that is when WTC schedules a race within a week of a Challenge event. Everyone signs up for the WTC race and very few sign up for the Challenge event.

Unfortunately, what WTC doesn’t understand is that they don’t need to crush the competition (any further). More races is a good thing for the sport. Having another viable series is healthy and encourages growth.

As a side note, I would never say I completed an Ironman if it was not an IM branded race. I would say I did an “Iron distance” race, but not an Ironman. Just my $.02.

Darn, I should have copyrighted the word “man”. Oh, and “Woman” as well. And “Iron” and “Triathlon” and “Asshole”. Nobody can use those words without getting my permission. I’d also like to copyright all of the vowels. Whenever anyone, in any language, utters something that sounds like a vowel in a English I want to be paid! I also want to copyright the straight line and all forms of the curve. Anytime anyone marks a straight line of any length, the owe me Money, same as if the mark a curve of any length or radius, including complex curves. All Governments in the world owe me millions because they have used my copyrighted lines and curves to build roads and structures.

Hey WSJ: what is this waiting list and lavish dinner of which you speak?

From the quality of writing and shallow research, I would never have guessed that was a Wall Street Journal article.

I was actually considering Capitolaman for next year, partly because the marathon goes into the Forest of Nisene Marks, but if it’s only got 35 signups despite its ads being in my Facebook feed every day, I’ll have to re-think that.

Also, has anybody attended a HITS event with only 30 competitors? That doesn’t even sound possible. maybe 30 per age group, but just 30 overall?

Perhaps it is best not to get my triathlon news from The WSJ.

I personally agree with what I have heard Macca say numerous times on his podcast… Ironman is a distance, not a brand. Yes, I understand that WTC legally owns the term Ironman, blah blah blah. If someone does a USAT certified race with the 2.4,112,26.2 distances, they are an ironman, period, regardless of what company happens to pay for the road closure permits. When Ironman started, it was a distance, just like a marathon is a 26.2 miles by definition regardless of who is promoting the race. Just my opinion.

I do also agree with what others have said, and my first IM in 3 1/2 weeks is an IM branded race. My second however, will depend on where and when I want to race again.

It will be interesting to see how you feel AFTER you have raced both an Ironman and an Iron-Distance race. In my experience there is a huge range in the quality of non-branded races. Some, like Vineman, are very good while others are very very poor. With Ironman you can count on a first class race experience regardless of the venue. Ironman has built their brand to be the strongest and most valuable in participation sports and they have every right to protect it. While people might refer to their blue jeans as “Levi’s” regardless of the actual maker, no one would argue that Levi Strauss & Co. should allow other companies to use their name, logo, or trademarks.

/

I personally agree with what I have heard Macca say numerous times on his podcast… Ironman is a distance, not a brand. Yes, I understand that WTC legally owns the term Ironman, blah blah blah. If someone does a USAT certified race with the 2.4,112,26.2 distances, they are an ironman, period, regardless of what company happens to pay for the road closure permits. When Ironman started, it was a distance, just like a marathon is a 26.2 miles by definition regardless of who is promoting the race. Just my opinion.

I do also agree with what others have said, and my first IM in 3 1/2 weeks is an IM branded race. My second however, will depend on where and when I want to race again.

It will be interesting to see how you feel AFTER you have raced both an Ironman and an Iron-Distance race. In my experience there is a huge range in the quality of non-branded races. Some, like Vineman, are very good while others are very very poor. With Ironman you can count on a first class race experience regardless of the venue. Ironman has built their brand to be the strongest and most valuable in participation sports and they have every right to protect it. While people might refer to their blue jeans as “Levi’s” regardless of the actual maker, no one would argue that Levi Strauss & Co. should allow other companies to use their name, logo, or trademarks.

/

Unfortunately sometimes it doesn’t even matter if the non-branded race is good the dominance of the “Ironman” brand kills quality independent events. For example, my first iron-distance triathlon was Expedition Man in Reno last year. The 140.6 race only drew about 30 competitors last year. In 2012 (it’s first year) it almost drew 100 hundred and the reviews on the race were excellent. As a matter of fact, the course, the support, and the overall organization of Expedition Man were first class, I can’t say enough about how well it was done. However, this race is now dead. Part of the reason it died is because of IM Lake Tahoe which was scheduled a month after Expedition Man. IM happens on the California side of Lake Tahoe and EM took place on the Nevada side. The draw of IM was so poweful that it virtually crushed EM. To me this was really sad because the quality of the event merited success but the reality is that the Ironman brand is a huge pull with triathletes.

I race IM 70.3 St. George and I can attest that the quality of WTC events is top notch but I think that it is incorrect to assume that because the event is not WTC it will be of lesser quality. Sometimes it comes down to: is the WTC rock concert atmosphere important to you? Do you get off on having Mike Reilley call you an Ironman? I’ll tell you what, the rock concert atmosphere is pretty awesome but I don’t think I would trade my Expedition Man experience for any other. EM felt like what the early IM’s must have felt like for those competitors in Hawaii. Very few competitors, very few spectators. Just you, your loved ones, volunteers and the course. It was freaking hard mentally and physically but it was awesome.

My next Iron-distance? Vineman!

I think it’s kind of silly this is allowed to play like this. It’d be like a corporation trademarking “marathon” when the first one of those was held, and every single other “marathon distance” race had to call itself a “full distance” or “26.2”. Ironman would be forced to finish with a “full distance” race instead of a marathon.

Darn, I should have copyrighted the word “man”. Oh, and “Woman” as well. And “Iron” and “Triathlon” and “Asshole”. Nobody can use those words without getting my permission. I’d also like to copyright all of the vowels. Whenever anyone, in any language, utters something that sounds like a vowel in a English I want to be paid! I also want to copyright the straight line and all forms of the curve. Anytime anyone marks a straight line of any length, the owe me Money, same as if the mark a curve of any length or radius, including complex curves. All Governments in the world owe me millions because they have used my copyrighted lines and curves to build roads and structures.

Actually, I think it is Marvel Comics that owns “Ironman” and WTC has to PAY them an annual license fee. Wouldn’t you love to read that contract?! If anyone has the inside skinny on the trademark agreement between Marvel and WTC please do tell … although I imagine the agreement includes a nondisclosure clause.

By the way, I also think WTC lost a trademark battle over Iron Woman and/or Iron Lady which is why there is an IronGirl series.

The legal team for the WTC can attack all the races it wants. I’m pretty sure that any athlete completing a 140.6 distance by any company will say that they did/ are an Ironman.

The WTC can go bleep themselves. They want to “Protect” their trademark, then they should go after every person using their logo (i.e. MDOT) tattoo without a license.