How to run the entire Ironman marathon – Part I

I have decided to begin to write down what I think I know about racing and training.

I plan to write a couple of other articles on this topic - hence the “Part I.”

Feedback is obviously welcome.

How to run the entire Ironman marathon – Part I: The Basics of Run Form

Distance events demand efficiency. When I look at the guys and gals at the top of our sport, the first thing I notice is how smooth and effortless they move. Their training has taught their bodies to perform each discipline while using the least amount of energy. They lack movement that is not used to propel them forward. They also perform each movement in such a way as to expend the least amount of energy. The last three sentences sound the same but describe slightly different reasons why they are able to go so far and so fast.

A very distinct, but often overlooked, indicator of running success is running form. There are some who teach that we are best off sticking with the running form that we have – that we can’t or shouldn’t change our running form. I disagree. If you take a close look at most successful runners, whether in triathlon, distance running, or track and field, you will notice one similar feature about their running form: they don’t strike the ground with their heel. There are the rare exceptions, however.

So, if you don’t strike with your heel first, which is how most of us started running, then where should your foot strike the ground? Your foot should hit the ground somewhere between the middle of the outer (lateral) edge of the foot and the forefoot (the ball of the foot). This does not mean that the heel never touches the ground, only that weight is not placed on the rear half of the foot. You are not “running on your toes.”

Attempting to change foot strike alone is not enough, and not really the point of changing your form. The main goal is to move the point where your foot hits the ground under your center of gravity. When a runner heel strikes, the leg is extended and the foot hits the ground in front of the center of gravity.

There are negative performance effects of your foot hitting the ground in front of your center of gravity. You are trying to move forward when you run. When your foot is applying force to the ground, the ground is also applying force back to your foot and in turn your body. So, when your foot is on the ground in front of your center of gravity, the ground is applying force to the rear – the wrong direction. Another negative effect is that it is difficult to maintain the proper stride rate of 180 beats per minute (bpm). Generally, a heel striker (not to label a person) takes too long of a stride and to maintain proper leg turn over would need to always run fast.

http://i10.tinypic.com/2porrs3.jpg
Here is an old photo of me with leg extended and heel striking.

There are also negative health effects of striking the ground with your heel first. When a runner’s leg is almost in full extension, the muscles of the leg begin to relax because there is very little force acting on the leg. When the heel hits the ground loose muscle and tendon react rather violently to regain tension to stabilize the leg. Two very common injuries that can be caused by this are Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS) and the o-so-common shin splints.

Also, when the leg is close to full extension and the heel hits the ground, where does the energy of the foot strike go? It goes directly into the skeletal system. Most runners rely on the 10 mm of foam between the ground and their heel to cushion the blow of the force of all of your body weight in motion coming down on a couple of square inches. Unfortunately, no running shoe technology will absorb that much impact. Instead, your joints, where there are thin slivers of cartilage and a little bit of movement, absorb a lot of the impact. You should be thinking about those sore knees and hips here.

http://i16.tinypic.com/2a7djc4.jpg
Here is a more recent photo with a mid foot strike.

Now, imagine that you have shortened your stride so that your foot lands underneath your center of gravity. How would you describe the state of your knee – almost fully extended or with quite a bit of flexion? Flexed is the correct answer. With your knee flexed, your muscles have to engage to absorb the impact. The impact that was once transferred through your heel directly into your skeletal structure is now absorbed by the contraction of the major muscle groups in your leg.

You will also be more efficient, once your body has adapted to the changes in your form. Instead of you foot hitting in front of your center of gravity and causing forces towards the rear, all of the forces that are exerted back by the ground are now propelling you forward/supporting your body weight.

Another effect of shortening your stride is that your muscles are now engaged when your foot hits the ground. This is because your knee is bent and your foot has begun a slightly rearward path before your foot has hit the ground. Since your foot is moving in an oval shaped path and where your foot hits the ground is the lowest point on the oval, it is moving towards the rear also. Think about an object moving in a circle. Imagine that the blue ball is your foot and it is moving counter-clockwise.

http://i10.tinypic.com/2wg6ccp.jpg

There will be a couple of changes in the rest of your running form that will come about because of the changes in your stride. Your arm swing will decrease. Since your legs are traveling a shorter distance, your arms will, too. You leg turnover will increase. To go the same speed as you did during your heel striking days with the long stride, you will need to increase the rate at which your legs hit the ground to go the same speed. Your stride rate should be around 180 foot strikes per minute (that’s both feet). This should be for all of your runs, except for maybe very short sprint efforts. To run faster you simply lean forward from the waist and increase the amount of travel in your arms – your legs will follow.

A few last pointers:
-The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. To reduce the amount of energy spent moving your limbs, move them straight. This means that your foot should move though a single plane that is perpendicular to the ground and parallel with the direction that you want to run – that is forward, by the way. The same thing goes for your arms. They should move in short motions to the front and to the rear, with a little movement toward the midline of your body to counteract the rotation of your torso.
-Arm Carriage: The bend in your elbow should be roughly 90 degrees or slightly acute of that.
-Lift your knees. Lifting your knees causes your knee to flex when your leg is moving forward. This makes your leg shorter while traveling forward, thus reducing the amount of energy required to move it.

http://i18.tinypic.com/4i77h47.jpg
Lower portion of left leg is high during the forward movement.

-Two demonstrations to help to change your stride:

=Watch a child run. Children almost always have a mid foot strike with a bent knee. They lack the overall economy, but they usually exhibit the basics.

=Run barefoot. This should obviously be limited to a short duration and on a predictable surface. You will not want to heel strike while running barefoot. Unless you have no feeling in your feet, you will almost assuredly strike the ground with your mid foot. Do some running and skipping drills on a relatively soft surface.

It will take time for your body to adapt to the changes. For me, the calves took the longest to adapt. I haven’t had any running injuries since I changed my form a couple of years ago. And, I ran every step of the marathon in both of the Ironman races that I have entered.

“Watch a child run. Children almost always have a mid foot strike with a bent knee.”

I coach kids soccer and have for my son’s team since he was 5 years old( he’s 9 now), and this is the one thing that I love to do - just watch the kids run. You can tell which kids really get it. They have a certain economy of movement and grace but also inhibition in their movemnet that I think is almost hardwired. Many loose this somewhere along the line. Another reason to keep them active.

Wow - mouthful. Heel striking/midfoot landing has been hashed out ad nauseum on here, letsrun.com, and countless other places. I ran the whole marathon (slowly at a 3:44) in LP this year as well, and I heel strike some (in a Saucony type-A racing flat). 10K races and below I midfoot land only. If I could run 2:40-ish marathon, this would work FOR ME. Also, I can show countless very fast/efficient runners who “heel strike”. Also, I barefoot run about once a week to 10 days in the Spring/Summer - and I still heel strike :slight_smile:

Bottom line is that many people can and would do a lot better midfoot striking, but in reality, they just need to keep their feet under them and run faster and the “heel strike” or “braking effect” will be eliminated. So many runners that attempt this try to concentrate so hard on not hitting their heel, they end up with a marked calf strain, soleus strain, achilles tendonitis, bouncing when running (wasting even more energy BTW), etc. One should focus more on overal body economy of motion - in most runners this will EQUAL a midfoot land at moderate speeds, but not the other way around.

eidt: forgot to mention - stellar post though! Trying to help, nice photos, experience, etc. What ST is all about!

I have decided to begin to write down what I think I know about racing and training.

I plan to write a couple of other articles on this topic - hence the “Part I.”

Feedback is obviously welcome.

First, thank you for the effort and the information,

Second, before I read all this, and with all the respect I can muster, I’d like to ask who are you and why should I read your article? Not to be too NIH about it, but I’d like to know your background and basis for what you are discussing and educating about. I haven’t seen or can recall vividly any of your prior posts, so I have very little to go on without asking straight out.

Thanks,

Parke

In some photos Cameron Brown appears to be heel striking…and he has just about the most efficient lookin running style of any runner in tris.

Good running form comes from a relaxed upper body. Relax your jaw, your shoulders and your hands. Minimize all unnecessary movement, especially in the upper body. The legs do what the legs do, everything else moves to provide proper balance. That movement should be limited as much as possible, hence we need to learn proper balance.

I used to pretend I was balancing a glass of water on my head as I ran late in races to maintain good form. When you tire you tend to drop your shoulders and start rolling your head around and flapping your arms. Keep it all still and steady and you’ll maintain good form and efficiency.

I am not a proponent of trying to coach runners to change their stride or footfall other than the balance thing. Runners are humans and we are all different; some of us have big feet, some have tight hamstrings, some have a long leg and a short one. The best runners in the world all have different strides.

If you maintain good balance and run a lot of miles your body will become more efficient all by itself without any conscious efforts or radical stride changes which more often than not cause stress and injury.

In some photos Cameron Brown appears to be heel striking…and he has just about the most efficient lookin running style of any runner in tris.

its almost impossible to tell where a runner strikes from looking at a photo. The pronation of the foot right before it hits the ground happens so quickly you can’t tell where the initial contact is made from looking at a still.

An interesting article. I think that the midfoot landing will come for people that do a lot of form work and speedier running. As a teenager, my brother and I used to drive to Snadbanks park in Ontario most weekends and do barefoot runs in the dunes which does great things for your foot strength (I need to start doing that again I think) and running efficiency. I think that the midfoot strike will help them with overall efficiency which could definitely help with the running the whole marathon in an IM strategy. When I first read the title of the post I thought that the ideas contained would be more directed at racing strategy and conservation. I have done 5 IM races and run the whole marathon every time (except for aid stations which I take at a fast walk to ensure that I get my fluids into me and not down the front of my jersey) and have IM marathons ranging from 3:12 to a bonked 3:29 in my first one. The major differences between the performances were due more to my bike fitness (and riding the entire race in the big chain ring at IMLP last year … friggin FD problems!) than run strategy, conditions, course, etc. I am a firm believer that, in addition to some solid run training, your marathon pace and ability to run the entire way in an IM is mainly determined by how strong you are on the bike and how well you can hold back for the first 100 miles of the bike course and not do anything foolish that comes back to bite you in the butt on the second half of the run. My $0.02.

I don’t buy it. Kids have terrible form.

They are undeveloped, there is no economy or grace… that’s immaturity.

Correct - I evaluate children running all the time (just did 3 today). They are NOT little adults and NOT very efficient. You don’t even have all the bones in your foot until about 3.5 (navicular) and no sesamoids under the 1st metatarsal until up to 11 years old! Calcaneal (heel bone) growth plate present until age 11 (girls) to 14 or so (boys) and can change heel strike patterns as well. When under 3, femoral and tibial torsion are often not fully finished either. So many kids are brought in for being “pigoen toes”, tripping, falling, running on toes, etc. After about 500 evals, I’d say even an ungraceful and ungainly adult runner is more “efficient” than most 5 year olds : )

“One should focus more on overal body economy of motion”

Agree! Accomplished by… GASP…wait for it… running more!

I appreciate that some members have taken the time to read my lengthy post. I am glad for the feedback, as well.

My qualifications are simply that I am a student of the sport and I have tried to put into words what “I think I know.” Just like any athlete/coach, I am in the process of learning.

rroof, I am sure that you know much more about foot development in children than I. We both agree that children are not efficient runners; I mentioned that in my OP. My point in the article was that how most children run, let’s say from 6-10 year olds, is a good demonstration of mid foot strike and short stride. This is the main topic of the article.

I agree with some of the other points such as: run more, relax, and pacing. I was simply not addressing those topics in the article. A book could be written, and many have, about these topics. This was simply Part I.

Hopefully, someone might gain something from the article. If not, that’s ok, too.

Richard

Again, very nicely written and thanks! I think what you have noticed as you have likely gotten faster/more efficient is your natural transformation from overstriding to a more midfoot landing. Perhaps you tried to do this. But, in reality (as synchronicity mentioned), you likey just ran/raced “more” and like swimming more, learned how to be more efficient running (or in the water - swimming only 10 times more important). Ah yes, back to the more is MORE thread : (

I’m sure the first long distance explorers felt the same: sail a long way across the ocean - it is flat 'cause it looks so. But, in fact, if you keep going it is actually a sphere and you come full circle (but that was not likely even remotely in the back of their minds). But, with further understanding, we can now make a more educated decision. Instead of turning back in the ship for fear of hitting the end of the world and falling off, it might be more advantageous to just keep going since we know the world is now round to get where we are going. Does that analogy make any sense? Probably not :slight_smile: (but it does in my mind).

This still most certainly helps a lot of slowtitchers/runners since that is a common “hated” part of the tri (well, perhaps behind open water swimming that is). Hopefully your post was read carefully, replies read, and the though process rolling in each slowtwitcher’s mind. This, coupled with training threads from the likes of Barry & Desert Dude, challenges from Dev, Andypants, Tigerchik, Parkito - will make slowtwitchers the fastest out on course next year! Yeah!

Well I guess I’m the exception. I totally agree with TOOFEWBIKES.

I appreciate the article and advocate everything he’s written.

Humans are lazy by nature. We are far too intelligent to swing from tree to tree as monkeys do. Rather, we’ve designed road systems and vehicles to* *propel us. There’s no need to swing from trees.

Same holds true for running. Why would we run as TOOFEWBIKES described when we could continue heel striking at 70 RPMs. Simple, because it’s lazy and easy. There’s no doubt running with the heel at 70 RPMS is easier then mid-foot running at 90 RPMS with the opposing leg behind the knee.

We as humans do everything we can with the least amount of effort needed. Is that bad. Not necessarily. Why use an abacus when we could use a calculator.

Most people will complain about TOOFEWBIKES running method because it’s difficult to get used to. When I started, I questioned every step. It was more difficult than my regular, basic heel striking, 70 RPM method.

But I stuck it out and I am by far a more efficent, faster runner than most.

Did anyone watch Kona 2006. Watch Norman’s stride. He appears to be running an easy 12:00min mile. Guess what, that easy looking stride is exactly what TOOFEWBIKES is advocating, but Norman is running sub 7:00 miles.

There’s no doubt running with the heel at 70 RPMS is easier then mid-foot running at 90 RPMS with the opposing leg behind the knee.

Did anyone watch Kona 2006. Watch Norman’s stride. He appears to be running an easy 12:00min mile. Guess what, that easy looking stride is exactly what TOOFEWBIKES is advocating, but Norman is running sub 7:00 miles.

Caveat to my answer and thoughts. I’m sleep deprived from a two day meeting, had a bottle of wine and taken a Lunesta 15min ago so the brain may not be working too well as I’m about to nod off on my keyboard.

That being said running running as a midfoot or heel stricker is independent of cadence but is a function of your biomechanics.

research shows that the majority of people will self select the proper stride length for them.

Same holds true for running. Why would we run as TOOFEWBIKES described when we could continue heel striking at 70 RPMs. Simple, because it’s lazy and easy. There’s no doubt running with the heel at 70 RPMS is easier then mid-foot running at 90 RPMS with the opposing leg behind the knee.


You just completely contradicted yourself in your own post. So what is easier/more efficient then? And just for fun, go to a track and just try to run a sub 6 min/mile at 70 “rpms” (I assume you mean each right foot strike) - I don’t think it will be easy. But the PACE overt heel striking or a slow cadence dictatedsIS easy, and that is what you are eluding too. Also, I don’t think most triathletes or runners are lazy at all - they just “jog” 20-30 miles/week like they have always done and it gets the job done. When you “forced” yourself to midfoot land you were faster - imagine that, by running/training more (and more likely increasing your overal body economy with a faster turnover with legs under your hips).

Also, watching pros run does nothing since you can show every conceivable gait type imaginable with awesome results (and Stadler is a pretty poor runner as far as pro triathletes go). Nothing was more interesting than watching Lisa Bentley (an excellent runner by any std.) with perfect form not being able to pass some AG guy with terrible form for miles on end :slight_smile:

I’m eluding to the fact that I agree with TOOFEWBIKES. That’s all. I’m not saying triathletes are lazy. Otherwise I’d be lazy.

But between both running styles and IMHO, 90 RPMS/min (yes, 180 for both feet) and mid-foot strking is the efficient way to run if you want to see further gains in your performance.

The only problem is, most people, including me, don’t have this as a natural running style. I had to work to learn it.

I feel this style helped me with my overall performance and placed me into another catergory of running. I honestly don’t feel I could have achieved it otherwise.

Regardless, no one is pushing this style on anyone. to each their own. Now let’s have a group hug :wink:

Thanks for to toofewbikes for a very thoughtful approach. I happen to think that knowing the credentials of a person is important in helping form an overall impression of their ideas, but only to an extent. In this case, this post represents the best of what slowtwitch has to offer - one individual’s ideas about improvement, formulated after careful thought and analysis. Although I’m not certain that I agree with everything toofewbikes has said, the way he has arrived at his conclusions is pretty scholarly. I very much look forward to Part II. Although what do I know? I’m just a (usually) lurker around here.

Shouldn´t you be running faster if you had it all figured out?

Just kidding…

I agree with the poster who said that this topic has been beaten to death. (Which of course doesn´t mean that the “truth” has been discovered already).

My personal opinion regarding strike point: I don´t believe anymore that there is one style that is best for anybody. Running style is very individual. It also greatly depends on speed. Obviously, when you go for a 2:50 marathon, then you have less time to roll over the whole foot, so a fast runner tends to strike more with the mid-foot then a slower runner. Saying that a 4:00 marathoner should strike with the midfoot and then be faster, in my opinion, is confusing reason and result.
I´ve run 2:34 on marathon and at that speed I run more via the mid of the foot. In an Ironman, when I creep around more, especially at the end, I roll a lot more. Also when getting tired the stabilizing muscles on the lower leg get weaker, so the stride gets less efficient and more a roller.

I agree with what you said with where the foot “should” strike the ground in relation to you body. It seems to me that this is true for most runners, regardless of their speed.

You can tell which kids really get it. They have a certain economy of movement and grace but also inhibition in their movemnet that I think is almost hardwired.

THAT IS THE SADDEST COMMENT I HAVE EVER HEARD FROM A '‘COACH’…THE FALSE IDEA THAT SOME KIDS ARE DIFFERENT THAN OTHERS BECAUSE THEY ARE SOMEHOW ‘HARDWIRED’ AND THEREFORE THEIR ABILITY IS PREDETERMINED - AND THAT THE COACH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. KIDS DEVELOP AT DIFFERENT RATES AND BY DIFFERNT STIMULAE - A KIDS COACH SHOULD BE THE CATALYST TO DEVELOPMENT…YOUR COMMENT IS TYPICAL OF TODAY’S SOCIETY…I TOO COACH KIDS SPORTS AND I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT NO ONE IS HARDWIRED AND THAT THE BEST THING A COACH CAN DO FOR KIDS (BUT MAYBE NOT YOUR OWN KID…) IS TO GIVE THEM THE TOOLS AND OPPORTUNITY TO ‘GET IT’

YOU DO A REAL DISSERVICE BY YOUR UNEDUCATED BIAS. DO THE KIDS A FAVOR AND STOP COACHING. THANK GOODNESS YOU ARE ONLY TALKNG ABOUT SOCCER AND NOT SCHOOL TEACHING…