How quickly did you start doing training of any kind after the race?
The typical rule of thumb, developed by Mark Allen I believe based on blood tests looking at inflammation markers, is six weeks. That resonates fairly well with my experience.
If I’ve had a smooth build and taper, it’s less. If I’ve had a rough build and taper, it’s more. Early season races - like Texas - take longer than late season races because most people typically have less training load under their belt early season.
But the biggest determinant, in my experience, is how quickly you try to ramp back up.
In 2013, for Ironman Melbourne, I got quite sick before the race. I ended up racing sick. Plus, of course, the massive travel involved in getting to/from Australia. I took a week off and then started trying to get ready for 70.3 St. George. It was way too soon. I needed two weeks at least totally off. Maybe even a month. I didn’t take it. And I never actually recovered. For the entire year.
I took five weeks at the end of the year totally off except for some swimming. And I finally recovered. Certainly I had some decent races that year. But nothing like what I was capable of.
Without question, the biggest regret of my career was not stepping away for a month (or two or three) when I should have.
After Melbourne, it was May, and I was already thinking about preparing for Kona. As a result, I DNFed in Kona. If I had simply done no training of any kind in April - taken the five weeks I took at the end of the year at the beginning - I bet I would have had a fine season. Maybe even a great one.
Even “easy” training is hard on the body.
If you are two months out, and still feeling it, take a break. A real break. I don’t mean, “oh, just swim and run a bit.” I mean actually stop training.
Put another way, I’ve never regretted taking time off after I took it. But I’ve always regretted not doing so…