Good breakdown of airline baggage costs by Wall St Journal

Since the travel season is upon us I thought it would be helpful to share this side by side comparison of shipping costs for baggage on major airlines. I hopeit will prove useful as some of you make your holiday travel arrangements.


++++++++++


**What It Costs An Airline to Fly Your Luggage **

As you head off on your Thanksgiving travels this week and prepare to pay airline baggage fees, you may wonder what it actually costs the airline to fly your 40-pound suitcase.
Based on our own estimate derived from consultations with industry executives and other sources, the cost to carry checked luggage comes to roughly $15 a bag. That, it turns out, is what most big airlines – including AMR Corp.'s American Airlines and Continental Airlines Inc. – are charging fliers to check their first bag. But those who check multiple bags, ski equipment or oversized or overweight luggage are paying much, much more – allowing airlines to make a tidy profit. In those instances, baggage fees may yield more profit for the airline than what the carrier is making on the basic passenger ticket.

Airlines don’t break out the expense of transporting passenger baggage, and they are tight-lipped about baggage because they know many customers are angry about the new fees. Airlines aren’t always so opaque when it comes to their cost data – American once famously counted the savings from removing olives from salads. But, several airlines contacted declined to discuss breakdowns of baggage costs; some were downright defensive. “I hope you would agree we are allowed to make a profit,” said one airline spokesman, adding his carrier doesn’t know what it costs to provide baggage service.

We all know how frustrating airline baggage service can be. At least one passenger per planeload arrives without his or her checked suitcase, and others are left to discover damage to their luggage, or even theft. But airlines do spend a lot of money moving luggage.

Until recently, soaring oil prices were adding to that cost. That’s why earlier this year, UAL Corp.'s United Airlines imposed a $25 fee to check a second bag on domestic flights, soon matched by most big U.S. carriers. In May, American became the first major carrier to impose a $15 fee on the first piece of checked luggage, also widely matched. Airlines also increased fees for large bags, heavy bags and people with more than two bags.
Today, most major airlines charge $15 each way to check one bag; $25 each way for a second bag; and as much as $125 each way for a third bag or any bag that weighs more than 50 pounds. Notable exceptions: Southwest Airlines Co. allows two free bags; JetBlue Airways Corp. and Alaska Air Group Inc. transport one bag free. A La Carte Pricing
Even though oil prices have receded, airlines say baggage fees remain because they are boosting the industry’s usually dismal finances and moving customers to “a la carte” pricing – passengers pay for the services they use, whether it’s a sandwich bought on board, a checked bag or assistance from a telephone reservationist. http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/PJ-AN712_pjMIDS_NS_20081124222029.gif
United, for example, has said it expects to collect $275 million annually from the first- and second-bag fees. AirTran Airways, which will begin charging $15 to check one bag next week, said it expects to take in $50 million to $100 million annually in fees.

Moving passenger baggage is an intensely manual operation, requiring lots of workers. On average, each bag gets touched by about 10 workers during its journey, airlines say.
Once bags are tagged, they are sorted and placed on carts, then driven planeside, where a crew loads them into the belly of a jet. The unloading process is more labor-intensive: Bags are sorted into luggage to be delivered to the carousel for passengers to collect and luggage that needs to be routed to connecting flights and has to be sorted and driven to lots of different planes.

“The art, or science, of handling bags is really more complex than people realize,” said Kerry Hester, vice president of customer service planning at US Airways Group Inc.

Not all of an airport ground worker’s time is spent on baggage, of course. Baggage handlers move cargo, direct airplanes into and out of gates and have other duties preparing flights. At the same time, there are expenses for workers beyond salaries and benefits: Baggage handlers have to be trained in hazardous materials, for example, and airlines run into millions of dollars in annual costs for on-the-job injuries related to baggage.

Add to that some portion of the duties of check-in personnel who tag the bags, service clerks who help customers with lost luggage, workers who maintain equipment and baggage service managers.

US Airways Chief Executive Douglas Parker said earlier this year that his airline spends $250 million on labor just to handle baggage. That was about 11% of the airline’s payroll last year, and works out to something close to $9 per bag. http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-CS544_midsea_D_20081124185339.jpg Getty Images

Based on our own estimate derived from consultations with industry executives and other sources, the cost to carry checked luggage comes to roughly $15 a bag.

In addition to labor expenses, airlines say they spend millions of dollars annually on baggage equipment, facilities and sorting systems, paying rent to airports for bag rooms, carousels and offices and buying carts, tractors and conveyors. They also pay to deliver lost bags to customers and pay claims for items never found. Airline executives suggest that boils down to about one-third to half as much as the labor cost; figure another $4 roughly per bag.

Then there’s the fuel cost to fly the bag. One rough formula sometimes used in the airline business to approximate fuel costs is that it requires 3% to 5% of the weight of an object in fuel to fly it one hour. That means at current fuel prices, it would cost about $1 to $2 to fly a 40-pound bag on an average three-hour trip.

Add it all up, and the best guess is around $15 per bag in airline costs. Whether coincidence or careful accounting, airlines settled on $15 as the fee to charge for the first checked bag.
American said setting the price at $15 first-bag price was “not precisely cost-based” but more pegged to what the airline thought customers would pay. “The second checked bag fee was already in the marketplace at $25, and we logically felt that the fee needed to be less than that,” spokesman Tim Smith said. Checking Fewer Bags
Airlines say the fees have already caused passengers to change behavior. Fewer customers are checking multiple bags; fewer are checking any bags, in fact. The reduction has improved baggage-handling reliability, with lower rates of lost luggage, and created more room for cargo on planes. Cargo rates are considerably more lucrative for airlines than passenger baggage. At many airlines, for example, the minimum charge for same-day cargo service of a small parcel is about $80.

But the baggage-fee frenzy still makes many airline passengers wonder: Isn’t luggage part of the service you get when you buy a ticket?

Initially, senior United executives said they believed one bag would always be included free, then imposed a fee on customers’ first bags a few months later. This summer, Delta Air Lines Inc. Chief Executive Richard Anderson said he thought it was fair for the airline to haul one suitcase free for passengers.

But earlier this month, Delta said it, too, would begin charging $15 one-way to haul the first bag, effective Dec. 5. (At most airlines, elite-level frequent fliers, first-class ticket-holders and international passengers are exempt from many of the fees.)

What changed? Customers were paying the fee at other airlines without a backlash. Delta said it wasn’t getting any benefit from not charging the fee. So why not charge it?


Write to Scott McCartney at middleseat@wsj.com

Good article.

I am not against the airlines charging a reasonable fee for a first second bag or even bikes. Generally people tend to travel with too much stuff. If you travel with a little bit of extra baggage you pay a little bit more. Seems reasonable. What is problematic is when it comes to bikes - airlines for one reason or another have had it out for bikes for a long time. I get it that they can be a bit unwieldy and require a bit of extra care. That’s why I never had a problem when it was $40 - $50 to check a bike or a bike box. I will gladly pay that each way to ensure the safe passage of my bike. Whenever I have traveled it’s been my second checked bag, so it seems fair that it get’s hit with the $25 second bag fee and then a bit more because of the extra work required to handle it. However, the airlines have gone crazy with this and, some are now charging $175 or more one way( Delta and others) for a bike. They will then add on other extra fees( second or third bag), oversize and over-weight fees. Their were people traveling to IMH, who paid more for their bikes to travel to Hawaii than they did - and they were sitting in a seat on the plane. This is now absurd and ridiculous in my view. In trying to reasonably discuss this with the airlines, I have been met with silence. So now, in future, I will be checking VERY carefully the airline that I am booking with and will, before commiting to the ticket, checking that airlines bike policy. The ONLY airlines that will be getting my business, will be the ones with a reasonable policy when it comes to traveling with a bike.

This was an absolute joke and I’m glad someone wrote something about this. When I flew to florida a while back, I bought a ticket from seattle to florida for under 200 bucks canadian return!! I was charged by delta 175 american each way for my bike. I blew a gasket, but they did nothing. Now the ticket guys I KNOW are just like cops and have the discretion to charge whatever they want or not at all, but they just looked at me like a deer in headlights, while I started spitting at them (not literally). We are helping the environment by riding a bike, keeping one less car off the road, they should be giving us a discount. Why not charge more for the ticket, really you are penalizing the wrong people and they could stand to make more money charging a bit more for tickets overall, than for the oversize. I am tempted to book two tickets and bring my bike box and put it on the seat beside me!! I will never fly delta AGAIN

sean

Why not charge more for the ticket,

Sean,

Good point. Part of the problem/issue here is that these days we are all our own travel agents. We get on Expedia or Hotwire or wherever and human nature we default to the lowest priced ticket. Then think - wow what a great deal I just got. We rarely look at the airline. Now, I will check the airline and will check into their bike policy before commiting to a ticket. It may actually be worthwhile paying more for the ticket upfront on the plane if it’s with an airline that is reasonable and consistant about the bike fees. Again, I have no problem with reasonable, extra fees for the bike, but when it costs me $300 to sit on the plane and it costs me $400 for my bike to sit in the hold - that’s ridiculous. I will take my money and business elsewhere. The article clearly states that we are being taken for a ride on this - no pun intended! :slight_smile:

We are helping the environment by riding a bike, keeping one less car off the road, they should be giving us a discount.
I fail to see how your environmentalist mindset helps Delta pay their bills. This is a terrible reason to expect a discount.

I LUV Southwest! :slight_smile:

I know you just copied and pasted, but im surprised the WSJ would have a math error in their story! The 15 total sum per bag cost may be accurate, but the computation for fuel is off (they only figured it for one hour): 40 lbs x 3-5%/hr x 3 hours = $3.6-$6 to fly the 40lb bag for three hours.
At ~130lbs, I think I deserve a discount for the 10-20 bucks I am saving them over the 250 lb dudes.

I fail to see how your environmentalist mindset helps Delta pay their bills. This is a terrible reason to expect a discount.

Sean’s a friend, but I would tend to agree with you.

If we were truly being environmentally friendly, we would not be getting on planes at all. George Monbiot, the author of “Heat” is advocating that we cut out all unnecessary airline travel - and yes, traveling to a triathlon or a training camp in the warm sunshine would be considered, unnecessary. Next to driving our cars excessively, airline travel is perhaps the next worst thing from an environmental perspective that most of us do.

I know, seems crazy and absurd, but if the threat of global warming is as bad as people say it is, we really have to do a re-think of how we to certain things and why we do them.

Wasnt Denver going to automate this whole process? Oh, wait - that will a billion wasted on a system that didnt work.

Wasnt Denver going to automate this whole process? Oh, wait - that will a billion wasted on a system that didnt work.
It wasn’t wasted, now we know the system won’t work and it only cost us a billion dollars.

I think Southwest is awesome too. I’m predominately fly SW now, switching from once being a loyal UA customer. I traveled alot for business at one time, and I had Exc Premier status, but then my work changed (thankfully) and I ended up not flying enough to make any of the award levels anymore. Once that happened, UA pretty much treated me like shit. It really stings to have seen both sides and the crappy service you really do get at UA. With SW, at least everyone is pretty much treated as equals and I really believe they have done an excellent job at providing a service.

I just flew with SW recently, and I saw this new cost-saving trick that I havent seen before. Instead of handing out the little boxes containing on serving each of: 1)Oreo Chip, 2)Cheese Crackers, 3) Nuts, 4) Pretzels, they just go around with a tray stacked high with the goodies. The flight attendants urged us to take as much of anything that you wanted. It was surpizing that people only took 1 item from the tray, if anything at all. Only a handful of people took more than one item. Alot of people took nothing at all. I bet they served the entire plane with 1/4 the amount of food normally given and all the people were twice as happy. That was some really smart out-of-the-box thinking in terms of cost cutting, if you ask me.

Fleck,

Westjet has the best fees for an airline in Canada.
$40 for a bike. No first bag fee.
Might not be as convenient flying from T.O. as Calgary is the Westjet hub…

Westjet flies direct to Kona, Hono, and OGG from Vancouver…

I know you just copied and pasted, but im surprised the WSJ would have a math error in their story! The 15 total sum per bag cost may be accurate, but the computation for fuel is off (they only figured it for one hour): 40 lbs x 3-5%/hr x 3 hours = $3.6-$6 to fly the 40lb bag for three hours.
At ~130lbs, I think I deserve a discount for the 10-20 bucks I am saving them over the 250 lb dudes.
bingo

I think rather than charge an overweight bag fee we should be given an allowance for us AND our bags. Then put me on the scale with my bag - I would never be charged and overweight fee again.

Meanwhile in Canada (which I bet means shortly here) morbid obesity is considered a handicap, therefore the extra seat needs to be given to huge guy for free - guess who will be footing THAT bill…

USAirways through the Iman website= FREE BIKE VOUCHER! I used it…$218 total to IMAZ from Chicago with bike. They even were a race sponsor, so I say our tri community should support them. We need to assist and support those that sponsor us and give us a break. Let’s face it, their sponsor dollars do help us do these races.

I’ve used this as well but had the extra hassle at the baggage counter as they were trying to verify the voucher. I paid a little more for the plane ticket but overall the price was cheaper due to the free bike both ways.

So, is there any other real option? Sending UPS? Or is this now just part of the total trip cost? :o(

Dave

Yeah…one option…

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/production/cessna172.jpg

A pair of tri bikes fits nicely in place of the rear seat. The schedule is better, too.

Yea but the goal was to save money. I have a friend that has 2 planes, but when we talked about the costs, he said it was cheaper to fly commercial than to fly his plane to a destination.

Dave

Why not charge more for the ticket,

Sean,

Good point. Part of the problem/issue here is that these days we are all our own travel agents. We get on Expedia or Hotwire or wherever and human nature we default to the lowest priced ticket. Then think - wow what a great deal I just got. We rarely look at the airline. Now, I will check the airline and will check into their bike policy before commiting to a ticket. It may actually be worthwhile paying more for the ticket upfront on the plane if it’s with an airline that is reasonable and consistant about the bike fees. Again, I have no problem with reasonable, extra fees for the bike, but when it costs me $300 to sit on the plane and it costs me $400 for my bike to sit in the hold - that’s ridiculous. I will take my money and business elsewhere. The article clearly states that we are being taken for a ride on this - no pun intended! :slight_smile:
x2 on Fleck’s points. Couple of other points.

While I may pay a slight bit more for Delta (plus it is a nearby hub), I have used them for years of frequent travels and earned medallion “status,” as Delta refers to it. What I have learned is that my frequent flyer status has enabled me to negotiate less “bike box” fees for my travels. I have actually had the fee waived altogether by a few of the friendlier skycaps and reduced significantly at other times due to frequent flyer status. As unfairly as this seems, bottom line is that if you travel a lot w/the same carrier, you get treated differently. As Fleck wisely notes, we can be lured into thinking that the cheapest airfare is a great deal. I’m in no way defending the airlines fees. If we are our own travel agents, then we must accept the responsibility to think beyond just the seat fare; moreover, examine the direct costs associated w/ the gear we bring with us.

“I know you just copied and pasted, but im surprised the WSJ would have a math error in their story! The 15 total sum per bag cost may be accurate, but the computation for fuel is off (they only figured it for one hour): 40 lbs x 3-5%/hr x 3 hours = $3.6-$6 to fly the 40lb bag for three hours.”

Actually if you look at that paragraph again, they are saying it takes 3.6-6.0 lbs of fuel, which works out to about .5-.75 gallons of fuel. Depending on the fuel pricing at the time of the article, they seem to be about right.