Giant Trinity Composite 2?

What’s your opinion of this bike:

http://www.giant-bicycles.com/_generated/_generated_us/bikes/models/images/550/2012/Trinity_Composite_2.jpg

I saw it at the bike shop last week when I was looking at the Shiv Comp, but thought it was more expensive and didn’t really look to closely. Now while poking around on the web, I see that I can get it for under 2000 dollars. That looks good!
Geometry is very limited on their websight but the short top tube and the 15 cm head tube look like they work out for me. Components are way better than the other lower priced bikes I’ve looked at. How does this bike compare to Shiv Comp, Speed Concept 7’s or Felt B16?

+1

Very few details about this bike online - interested in hearing what ST has to say about it.

Not as impressive looking as the Trinity Advanced SL but looks like a great budget bike to me. I haven’t bothered looking at the geo but you mentioned short top tube. Are you sure? The Trinity Advanced is a loooong bike so you may want to be certain that this doesn’t share the geo with the Advanced if you want a short top tube.
If you end up buying it I would love to see some pics.

I just bought this bike in April. I recently did my first HIM on it at the Gulf Coast Triathlon a couple weeks back. I have nothing but good things to say about it. I can’t compare this bike to much since I upgraded from a 2005 Felt S32…but the comfort level and speed it has added are amazing. I had a rough time holding 20 MPH over a 50-60 mile ride on my old Felt…and I held 21.5 MPH comfortably for the first 50 miles at Gulf Coast with plenty left for the run (had to slow down the last 6 miles with a MASSIVE head/cross wind). Anyway…I love the bike and look forward to getting some race wheels and seeing how fast I can go on this thing!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/79313294@N07/7267318640/in/photostream

Don’t have any personal experience with this bike, but we do like this feature:

http://cdn0.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net/2011/09/03/2/giant_trinity_advanced_top_tube_600.jpg
.

That’s the composite 1. I don’t know if they are planning on adding this to the Composite 2…but mine does not have the attachment for a speedpack.

I was just in a shop that had an advanded 1 (i think it was the 1 not the 0) i hadnt seen one of them in person since the first generation

i see they changed up the brakes and the nose cone is a little smaller. honestly considering asking my local shop (a Giant dealer) what he can do on one… but i do like my Shiv

I don’t know about THIS model, but for $2000 it sure looks like it will take you a long ways up through the ranks. if it fits, go for it!

Tim

They show a large to have a 54.6 top tube. Depending where it’s measured It just might be right for me. I have to get back over to the shop and see if the bike is still on display. This bike could be the difference between riding on Zipps and dreaming about Flo’s.

It did pretty well in the Tour test (last month or so) and won overall. The test was basically “cheap tri/TT bikes”. IIRC <3000 Euros
http://i50.tinypic.com/5nnal2.png

I just took one home today. Before I decided on the Giant, I looked online for any reviews I could find. Sadly there were little to none available. I figure I should post up how I came to with my decision to go with this bike instead of the Cervelo P2 that was on sale at my LBS for 2500.00.

I’ve been riding road bikes for a while now. Recently I have started to get into triathlons and so far, I love it. After my first event, I wanted to get a tri bike. So after a month or so of mulling around, I narrowed it down to these two bikes.

First I will go over with what I liked about the P2. I thought the P2 looked better than the TC2 (Trinity Composite 2) of course that is subjective. Looking at it from the front, the P2 was thinner. It comes with 3T Aura aerobars which look awesome IMO (I will say up front I had some biases towards this brand because I have 3T parts all over my road bike and I’m very happy with it). The P2 was also really light compared to the TC2. I would go even as far as to say it’s almost as light as my road bike. I also like the brake feel on this bike compared to the TC2. I don’t feel like I have to pull as hard on them as I did on the TC2.

What I didn’t like about this bike however, is that it felt unstable. Keep in mind that having only about 30 miles of experience riding on aerobars, I’m pretty much a noob on this. My height is 5’6" and I’m about 17-18" shoulder to shoulder. I had the arm pads adjusted as far wide as possible on the Aura bars and I felt that it wasn’t wide enough for me. Basically when I rode it in aero position, I had a death grip on those bars. The 3T Aura, as cool as it looks, doesn’t really leave much room in terms of adjustability.

Next I take out the TC2. This bike is heavy by comparison to the P2. Using my bathroom scale, the weight of this bike comes to around 20 lbs. The things I do like about this bike are: The hidden brakes. Instead of single pivot brakes on the front, this looks like a mini Vbrake.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7122/7755799698_2c11e54966_o.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8291/7755799490_9e8377cf86_o.jpg

I also like how much adjustment you can do on this bike. You can adjust the arm pads as wide or as narrow as you want and also adjust the pitch. But I’m guessing that is normal on some Profile Aerobars right?

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8295/7755799392_07b58909a4_o.jpg

Three settings on how far forward you want to move the saddle.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8305/7755823388_142eca4465_o.jpg
And because it’s a heavier bike, this thing absorbs the bumps nicely compared to the P2. The integrated speed/cadence sensor and Di2 compatibility is a nice touch too.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8426/7755799274_4b9ceab23d_o.jpg

The thing that I don’t like about the bike though, I would say is the relative weight of this to the P2. Also the brake levers seem to take more effort to pull than the ones on the P2. The rear brake also makes a squealing noise when you brake but I think that is due to where it is. I used to own an Haro mountain bike that had “Saved by the Bell” graphics on it. The rear brake was also in the same position as this bike and that too made a lot of noise. But I suppose you can’t have it all.

The price on this bike was 2100 dollars. After accessories like the speedfil and such, it ended up still being cheaper than the Cervelo. The first thing I’m going to upgrade on this would probably be the crankset (would do the same thing, if I went with the P2). Ultegra cranks can be had for about 200 bucks I believe. Overall though, I’m very happy with this purchase. I can’t wait to ride it longer than a test drive tomorrow. I hope it doesn’t rain.

-jamie

I would not upgrade the cranks. That will buy you nothing in terms of speed. If you want a faster bike you should upgrade the base bar. That round bar is anything but fast.

Awesome. Thanks for the follow up conecrazy! And thanks for the little tour. I didn’t even realize they had integrated speed/cad sensor. That’s def. an awesome (an aero) bike for $2100. Enjoy. And I agree. Don’t upgrade the cranks. Save the money for something else.

Thanks for the advice y’all. I’ll definitely look at replacing the base bar and the wheelset instead when the time comes.

I rode it today for about 30 miles. I felt right at home with it. I think that this bike would benefit greatly from better hubs or even ceramic bearings though. It felt kind of mushy when I pedaled. But it could also be that the bike needs time to break in. If anything this wheelset would be a great set of training wheels.

I’m going to dub aerobars as cheater bars. LOL They make a huge difference.

-jamie

Good pics and info. So does your TC2 have top tube storage mounts like this ?

It doesn’t unfortunately.

Oh also if you mount a Speedfil on it, the bolts are on the seat tube instead of the down tube so a bracket will have to be made so it can be mounted securely.

I think that Giant has been making some great bikes for a few years now. They were the first guys in the cycling industry to hire Simon Smart, and that guy is wicked… um… smart. The TC is based on his TA without the nose cone and stem system, it offers more flexibility in the setup and a great deal of the same benefit as the top end model.

If you are spending money for upgrades, definitely concentrate on the base bar - aerobar and wheels.

As with any bike, the first thing is to enjoy riding it, the second is to enjoy that often. Everything else follows from there.

Congrats on your bike, and thanks for sharing these info!
This is the bike I am thinking in as well, and unfortunatelly there is not so much info available about it…
Two questions:

  • Which size you have? Do you know anything about its stack and reach measures? If not, could you measure it for us?
  • Integrated speed/cadence sensor is awesome! But what about its compatibility? Does it need a special/dedicated bike computer?
    Thanks in advance, and enjoy riding it!

Thanks,

I got the small size. I don’t know what the stack and reach measures are, but I’ll try to get them for you.

The speed cadence sensor is this one: http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/photos/giant-2012-road-launch/179032

It uses the ant+ protocol.

Thanks for the info.
I have some good news for those who are interested in this issue: I got some rough measurement data for size medium S&R.
I jumped in a bikestore (bikestore.cc in Vienna, Austria) and they were kind enough to let me to do some measurements. As I have very limited tools and time, data are not accurate, but more than nothing and good for orientation:
Reach: 41.5 cm
Stack: 53-53.5 cm

Awesome!

I replaced the wheelset with an old set of wheels I had on an older road bike (Easton EA50SL). They are just a tad lighter than the Shimanos and I installed ceramic bearings on them. The pedal feel feels a much more positive now. :slight_smile: