I am also a Cdale, and ride a custom set of 808 with a PT sl laced in. I have been using the Tufo S3lites since 2005 and have not had a single puncture on these tires. Of note, I rode these same wheels/tires during all of my training miles outdoors, and indoors on the trainer (kurt kinetic) so I could log my training in WKO+. I swap on a fresh set of tires before each big race, and then train on them until they wear out. I also pre-treat the tires with a few ozs. of Tufo tire sealant and then keep a bottle of vittoria pit stop in my kit. Thus far I have had ZERO flats. I"ve pulled some staples out of the tire after riding, which sealed within 2 seconds (spin the wheel so the puncture is on the low side before removing any debris, it seems to seal quicker), but the roads in San Diego are usually pretty decent. I think this tire is one of the best for a Clyde, you can run them anywhere you like, I train on them at around 160psi, and race them higher, but it depends on the course and conditions.
I have a set of the GP4000S’s also, use them for training when Im not logging wattage, seem to have the same durability as the Tufo’s so far, but will probably outwear a Tufo significantly as the miles pile up.
Ummm…do you realize that you actually train on faster tires than your “race” tires?
I’ve read the different reports that show up from time to time, and I try different tires on different occasions. At 200psi on dry smooth asphalt, the TUFO feels good and handles well; and that is confidence inspiring. The GP wont reach those pressures and has a very different feel. Ultimately confidence in your equipment has been shown to improve an athletes performance so perhaps the equation balances itself out?
Yikes! Where do we start with this? Tire selection? PSI? Feels good? All I can come up with is BAD, BAD, BAD, run away, far away and cover my eyes and ears.
Maybe I can say it this way. You’ve selected one of the slowest tires, made it slower by overinflating it and then justified it by the way it feels in total opposition of actual data that supports doing something completely different. Double yikes!
and yet…I’m faster than hell on a bike…go figure!
but more to the point (your point, not mine), can you define overinflation please. While you are at it, please state how inflation to different pressures affects footprint, and then how that footprint (at state pressure) is altered by the weight of the rider. Finally, state how that footprint at state pressure with stated rider weight will create a measured level of friction with the tire at speed. (probably should quote a speed as well).
Here again is someone willing to jump in and state across the board (naively), that because He read it somewhere, that it HAS TO be true all the time, and for everyone. Do you really believe this?
So anyway, please post up the data to answer my questions; and set me straight. Again, here’s what I need you to answer in order to refute what I WROTE.
- state the tire pressures in the test,
- state the tires load represented as rider weight
- state the change in footprint/contact patch for the pressures used, and correlate that with the surface friction created.
- state the surface used (just so we know).
- state the speed or speeds that these tests were performed at.
thanks,