DYI aero test (wing dream V the wing) , help me with "results"?

hi , we did a bit of a test to see if there was any differace in aero helmets we have
one is wing dream , one is the wing
done by myself and my partner on a out n back course 1min apart about 9.2k in total (unforunatly she stopped at a different spot slightly short biut at the same spot each time , and also she lapped at the turn around as i lapped the whole out n back )
we both ride exactly the same bike (trek SC gen 3) same PM (power to max) tyres wheels etc , pretty much the same height and weight and a very similar position

we did 4 out n backs 2 with each helmet but rotated each time
out was slightly up hill , but into a slight head wind which did pick up slightly as we went on

from what i can see is that she is slighty more aero than me and also there seems to be no difference in the helmets
if anything the the wing is better for me and the wing dream may be better for her but doesnt seem to be a great deal in it

any thoughts ? or was this just a waste of time

her
A wing dream
9MIN40 4.59k 28.5kph 152np (out)
7 min32 4.43k 35.3kph 151np (back )

B the wing
9min03 4.35 28.8kph 156np (out)
7min51 4.38 33.5kph 147np (back)

C wing dream
9min43 4.6k 28.4kph 154Np (out)
7min21 4.4k 35.9 155np (back)

d the wing
9min41 4.59k 28.4kph 157np (out)
7min21 4.39 35.8 151np

me
A the wing
17min.03 9.25k 32kph 164NP (total)

B wing dream
16min 42 9.25k 33.2kph 172np(total)

C the wing
16min21 9.23k 33.9kph 175np(total)

D wing dream
16min23 9.24 33.8kkph 174NP (total)

any comments good or bad would be appreciated
thanks

Working out the pCdA values, it looks like on average the Dream is about 2.5% lower drag than the Wing on her and 3% lower on you.

Maybe someone more experienced on the models will chime in.

1 Like

thanks @PatrickCleary
good to see it wasnt a complete waste of time

so what would 3% less drag mean in time over a 5-30hr bike?
thanks

At 175W that gets you 1.9km more, or finish the same distance in what looks like 3.5 minutes faster.

I think that math is right, but it’s done in Excel on my phone.

Worth nothing there are a lot of other factors here, which is where the Chung method comes into play.

1 Like

Can you share the pCdA values for each run?

I’m wondering if the test results are stat sig.

Nope, it won’t be. Not enough data, it looks like they were probably getting warm, one direction had an uncharacterized head wind or a hill in one direction.

1 Like

Is the average power for each lap the same as the normalized power? I wouldn’t look at nP for aero testing, average power is much more relevant

I did outdoor aero test using the Wing and the Dream. For me the Dream had a lower CdA of .006, which is not insignificant, but you need a good sensor to tease it out.

@PatrickCleary thats correct , it was up hill slightly and a little head wind on the out bit of each lap

How did you estimate the 3% improvement on him? Results of Runs C and D “look” identical. While A and B make the Dream “better” but when comparing the pCdA to C and D, it seems as if maybe wind or something else could have been skewing the results?

1 Like

@Engner66 that’s sorta the way I see it but I have no idea at all , so happy for any thoughts
The wind did pick up on the last two runs but it was a head wind pretty much and not that strong just stronger than the first two runs

Do you have a thought on my partners data ?

I thin @desertdude has tested these helmets

1 Like

Yes, with me. :slight_smile:

@david yes as helmets are very different for each person we where trying to see if there was any differences in the two helmets with myself and my partner
Be good to get some input from others on our “data”

@imswimmer328 the avg power was almost identical to the NP

Take this with a grain of salt: I don’t have a ton of experience doing tests other than my own bro-science tests including helmets. In my humble opinion, the differences shown for both of you are not significant enough to have a clear winner between the two. I would go with the Dream simply because it’s a newer helmet and I like the look of it :stuck_out_tongue:

Next time, for comparison and for fun if you are a nerd like me :nerd_face:, try a “Baseline” helmet such as a non-aero with a ton of holes to really get a feel for your test runs accuracy level. You will see a significant difference between the baseline and any of the aero ones.

1 Like

@Engner66
Yes I’m like u
I have no idea but I think by looking at the data there doesn’t seem to be a lot in it
She likes the dream as it more comfy and the vision is amazing

Will try and add in a “normal “ helmet next time to see the difference
Cheers

I mentioned it because when I did my own testing, could not find much between Javelin, Aerohead (other than heavy and hot), and Rapid Tri. Was worried my test protocol simply wasn’t sensitive enough. However, when I uadded the Air Attack Shield to the roster, the difference was as clear as daylight, the Attack was significantly slower than any of the other three.

I averaged the final coefficients. The data’s too coarse to do anything else.

1 Like