Using the oft-quoted rule of thumb, this equates to ~5 seconds over 40K.
Finally, Gerard commented (which I can’t find right now) that the P3SL and P2C are very similar aerodynamically.
So, putting this all together, I get the following (over 40K)…
P3C
P2C/P3SL at +0:05
P2SL at +2:00
I’m sure at the very, very pointy end, those 5 seconds might matter. But what I see is that the P3C, P2C & P3SL are basically tied, while the P2SL is ~2 minute back.
Does that pretty much sum it up, or did I screw up the math?
P3 is carbon, P3SL is aluminum. There was also a P3C which was carbon and they just dropped the C at one point.
Edit, Cervelo has monkeyed with the P3 series names, it pretty much goers like this from oldest to newest
P3 painted al bike
P3SL same frame as P3 anodized instead of painted
P3C carbon version
P3 rename of P3C to P3 I think they dropped the aluminum P3 series bikes at this time, but their are old painted al P3s as well as new carbon P3s.
There is the P3 - its aluminum, obviously different than the P3C which is carbon
The P3SL is the same as the P3, aluminum. it is ~100 grams lighter, black paint scheme.
the p3c will be a bit more slippery in the air than the older aluminum p3, and lighter. The older p3 sometimes has lower and longer geometry though, for those that are trying to get crazy low, that might help…but the P3C is plenty low imho.
I recently got a P3. How do I know if it is a P3C or a P3SL and what is the difference?
Are there any frames out there that match the geometry of the 48 P3sl? The stack/reach is 451/390 I believe, which is just ridiculous, a full cm lower than anything Cervelo currently makes.
Are there any frames out there that match the geometry of the 48 P3sl? The stack/reach is 451/390 I believe, which is just ridiculous, a full cm lower than anything Cervelo currently makes.