Tom,
Personally, I’d say that you must adhere to your professional ethics, for a sense of moral responsibility and due to potential legal ramifications. If I, the customer, come in with a kooky idea that could get me hurt, you have absolutely NO requirement to provide that service. If, however, I have a kooky idea (incidentally…I’m known for kooky ideas, albethem nowhere near the sheer nuttiness of Good King Bunnyman) that will negatively impact my performance, efficiency or fun factor, then you–the subject matter expert upon whom I am leaning not just for commerce but also advice–are morally bound to share your misgivings with me. The thing that takes it a step above/up another notch, however, is when you make me understand why my idea is kooky and offer alternatives.
…Give a man a fish versus teaching him to long-line, and other such nonsensical parrables…
The elitism factor comes into play in two ways. First is the delivery of your (rhetorical “your”) response to my zany idea. If you roll your eyes and tell me I’m off my rocker, I’m probably going to think you’re jealous of my innate criminal genius. That’s human nature. If, however, you thoughfully and gently say “Scott, that’s interesting and I’d love to hear what you intend to do with that Nexus rear hub mated to that Zipp 404 rim run on your racing unicycle BUT, I think you might find some other, safer alternatives. Perhaps I can help and together we can come up with a way-cooler idea that will be the shiznickity…,” then I am more likely to think that your interests are compatible with mine.
Second, if I give you that upper price limit, it has to be respected. If it cannot be met (“Mr. Demerly, hi, I’d like a sub-17 pound fully aero tri bike and I won’t spend a dime over $500.”), please explain to me why not in terms of the frame and components rather than your mark-up, profit margins and/or capital overhead. More importantly, offer me alternatives and, again, make me understand the opportunity cost(s) of my choice(s).
I’ve seen these two functions performed both poorly and well at LBSs in San Diego and New Orleans. …And as a consumer, I make my choices based upon the way that a retailer makes me feel with regards to their respect for my ideas and, more importantly, their respect for my success.
I think that you, the retailer, know who’s serious and who’s not. Please correct me if I’m wrong. What I think might be tricky, though, is the shy, unsure consumer who might not know enough to ask the right questions. That’s where the issue of retailer attitude comes into play. Teach the newbie what bikes and fit are about, and you’ve just given birth to another happy, fulfilled triathlete…
Cheers,
Scott