Here is the verbiage:
Unisured/Underinsured Motorist Bodily Injury Coverage, we will pay compensatory damages for which an insured is legally entitled to recover from the owner or operator of an unisured/underinsured motor vehicle because of bodily injury:
1. Sustained by the insured
2. Caused by an accident; and
3. Arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of an uninsured/underinsured motor vehicle
We will not pay for punitive or exemplary damages.
Obviously there is a lot more, but I believe this the pertinent section.
Not every insurance company has this coverage. Safeco, AAA, AmFam(not exactly the same), and NatGen are the ones I know. I believe in quoting State Farm and Allstate(which now owns NatGen) do not.
Also my agent was very specific about wanting a true Umbrella policy and not an Excess Liability policy.
Here is the comparison:
In my agent’s real-world example(3 clients) a true umbrella covered a sexting scandal among high school students while those with Excess Liability policies were on their own.
From whom do you obtain your umbrella coverage and the particular rider you mentioned in a previous post?
Currently I’m with NatGen. Before that I was with AAA insurance and Safeco. Those all had this endorsement/rider. Prior to that I was a schlub and didn’t SBR.
I’ve dealt with the same independent agent for nearly 30 years. I switch every 5 years so because every company I deal with increases homeowners for existing customers at considerably beyond inflation.
Even if you a company specific agent explain what you want and see if they offer it. My goal was to protect my family if I get hit and turn into a paraplegic and I knew I couldn’t trust the other motorist to be Mr. Moneybags.
I want to follow up and thank you for bringing this to the attention of slowtwitch. This basically made me reevaluate the coverage I currently have. Though I have had true umbrella coverage for a while, I was not aware of the existence of an endorsement/rider that would allow one to sue one’s own carrier should someone in one’s family is struck by UM/UIM.
American Family (which operates mostly in the Midwest and some western states) does provide this endorsement, at a cost of ~$125/year for $1M of coverage, while Geico did not.
Furthermore, I was also under the impression that in Wisconsin, the UM/UIM coverage on a policy holder’s auto insurance would not extend to cover situations when the policy holder is cycling or walking, but that apparently isn’t the case. It turns out that while Geico would not willingly provide this (see aside below), AmFam does indeed provide such coverage under policy holder’s auto insurance UM/UIM coverage, when the walking/cycling policy holder is struck by someone UM/UIM. So in the end, the endorsement/rider under umbrella coverage would be on top of what is provided by the policy holder’s UM/UIM coverage under auto insurance.
This basically made me realize that my existing Geico policy wasn’t the most suitable (as my wife and I both walk and cycle a lot). Thanks again.
As a side note, what is covered under auto UM/UIM differs from state to state and from company to company. I distinctly remember the Geico agent saying a walking/cycling auto policy holder residing in PA would be covered under the UM/UIM auto coverage, but this was different in NJ and WI (at least for Geico in WI). Having said that, the guide written by the Commissioner of Insurance of Wisconsin clearly states that an auto policy holder’s UM/UIM should extend to at least the situation when the policy holder is walking, yet Geico appears not to acknowledge this, which is baffling.
I’m actually paying a bit more by switching to AmFam, for pretty much the same level of coverage, but that Geico either doesn’t know or isn’t willing to expressly comply with what the Commissioner of Insurance deems proper signals to me that even if Geico is legally obligated to extend vehicle UM/UIM to pedestrians, it would probably not willingly provide it.