Bernstein: Usain Bolt Is Probably Doping (And You Know It)

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/08/12/bernstein-usain-bolt-is-probably-doping-and-you-know-it/

Usain Bolt. (Photo by Alexander Hassenstein/Getty Images)
http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/dan-bernstein2.jpg?w=140&h=130&crop=1
Reporting Dan Bernstein
By Dan Bernstein-
CBSChicago.com Senior Columnist
**(CBS) **There’s nothing wrong with watching the Olympics – particularly track and field – with full awareness that most of the achievements being celebrated are not entirely human. In fact, that’s the only reasonable approach for anyone with even a passing interest in these events.
For many of us, years of drug-tainted performances have deadened the senses. Records fall, anthems play, shoes get sold, and then we get back to sports that matter more to us. For others, the athletes are not so much tainted as scientifically enhanced – the competition viewed now as a high-tech synergy of man and molecular engineering, in which the outcomes can still be celebrated for what they actually are, regardless of the laughable rhetoric that accompanies the games, insisting it’s something more pure.
There is another place where too many still exist, however, that is as intellectually dishonest as it is willfully ignorant, where convenient blind spots and emotionaI neediness cause otherwise intelligent people to create fairylands of childish naiveté.
It is indefensible ground. The province of suckers.
Even the simplest assessment of the circumstances surrounding the explosive success of Jamaican sprinting, for example, sets off alarms. There is enough information available that you’d think it would keep anyone from waxing romantic about Usain Bolt or his teammates.
“When people ask me about Bolt, I say he could be the greatest athlete of all time,” Carl Lewis told the Times of London. “But for someone to run 10.03 one year and 9.69 the next, if you don’t question that in a sport that has the reputation it has right now, you’re a fool. Period.”
Jamaica’s Yohan Blake, who just won the silver in the 100 and 200, tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug prior to the 2009 World Championships. Teammates Julian Dunkley and Steve Mullings have also been caught doping.
What are the odds that a tiny, island country suddenly dominates global competition…just because?
Bolt reportedly has been working with Angel Hernandez, too. Hernandez used to be called Angel Heredia, back when he was a chemist for BALCO and later “Source A,” who supplied the documents that helped convict Marion Jones, Tim Montgomery, C.J. Hunter and Justin Gatlin. Gatlin just took bronze in the 100, behind Bolt and Blake.
Before the games in Beijing, Heredia told Germany’s Der Spiegel that, regarding the 100-meter final, “the winner will not be clean. Not even any of the contestants will be clean. There is no doubt about it, the difference between 10.0 and 9.7 seconds is the drugs.”
Usain Bolt went on to win that final with a time of 9.69.
Those still scrabbling for a foothold of belief in the imaginary will refer to the testing programs, citing that Bolt is among those who have no positives on record. This is, of course, ridiculous.
Jones always tested clean, as have others known to have cheated. Former World Anti-Doping Agency chief Dick Pound told Reuters yesterday that he’s particularly unhappy with the way Jamaican athletes have been tested.
“They are one of the groups that are hard to test, it is (hard) to get in and find them, and so forth,” he said. “We are starting to get better at smart testing, but there’s a long way to go, yet.”
Responding to BALCO owner Victor Conte’s assertion that 60 percent of London competitors were using PEDs, Pound admitted “He is probably more likely to know than we are. I hope it is not 60 percent, but it is certainly a lot more than we are catching.”
Independent minds covering the Olympics have a responsibility as healthy skeptics. Those working for corporate partners may not have the freedom to tell the truth to viewers, listeners or readers, but those who are not are indeed obligated to do so.
It is a shame that even now, after Ben Johnson, the East German program, Chinese swimmers and BALCO, that a preponderance of evidence fails to create a chorus of doubt. When coldly examining the dirty landscape of the Olympics and sprinting in particular, a clear mind can see overwhelming probability for what it is, and deal with it intelligently and honestly.
Anyone wasting words extolling the greatness of Usain Bolt should know better.
http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/bernstein-90x130.jpg?w=60
Dan Bernstein joined the station as a reporter/anchor in 1995, and has been the co-host of Boers and Bernstein since 1999. Read more of Bernstein’s columns, or follow him on Twitter: @dan_bernstein.

Michael Phelps too. There can be no other explanation for his greatness. Oh wait, he is American so it must be talent :wink:

Well, he’s Jamaican, and THC is banned, so yeah, he’s probably doping.

How many positive drug tests for U.B.?
Without a positive you are just trashing the man’s rep. By Bernstein’s analysis everyone could be a suspect. Why have drug tests if we must endure this nonsense?

How many positive drug tests for U.B.?
Without a positive you are just trashing the man’s rep. By Bernstein’s analysis everyone could be a suspect. Why have drug tests if we must endure this nonsense?

I am trashing? I just posted what someone else wrote.

.

No,not you. Sorry, but I meant Bernstein!

No,not you. Sorry, but I meant Bernstein!

Thanks since if I had, it would have been way out of line.

.

Reposting what some other guy is writing is just propagating his accusations. You’re just as guilty of accusing without substance by re posting!

While I do not support or deny the article it did seem strange that no one (or hardly anyone)questioned UB performance(s) or his countrymen. Say unlike cycling where its almost automatic

Reposting what some other guy is writing is just propagating his accusations. You’re just as guilty of accusing without substance by re posting!

Dev, give me a break. So now you make a new rule that if we post about another other persons opinion or what someone else wrote you are “just propagating his accusations”?
Wow, I guess we should just close ST down.

.

I assumed that’s what you were doing to generate discussion.

Posting whole articles usually constitutes a copyright violation, for future reference. Better to link to the article and quote one or two lines.

Anyway Bernstein comes across as a racist jerk, IMHO.

I assumed that’s what you were doing to generate discussion.

Posting whole articles usually constitutes a copyright violation, for future reference. Better to link to the article and quote one or two lines.

Anyway Bernstein comes across as a racist jerk, IMHO.

I thought I have seen folks do the whole article but if this is wrong, Dan please post. I did put the direct link and kept all his info etc so they got full credit, which I would assume make it okay.

Yep, I thought the goal of the forum was to generate discussion. I thought all the posts about Lance stuff is doing the same. Oh well, we know how ST works. Attack.

.

for someone so into rules, why don’t you know them. Things to know about this forum, stickie at top of thread, “fourth thing”.

Reposting what some other guy is writing is just propagating his accusations. You’re just as guilty of accusing without substance by re posting!

huh

It’s sprinting. The legacy of sprinting from the 80’ad 90’s is doubt. Any person who follows the sport, even casually, is justified in having some questions I think.

Hell, if we just assume they are clean then why bother with the testing. Given that silver and bronze medals both went to past dopers only adds more fuel to the fire of doubt.

I assumed that’s what you were doing to generate discussion.

Posting whole articles usually constitutes a copyright violation, for future reference. Better to link to the article and quote one or two lines.

Anyway Bernstein comes across as a racist jerk, IMHO.

I thought I have seen folks do the whole article but if this is wrong, Dan please post. I did put the direct link and kept all his info etc so they got full credit, which I would assume make it okay.

Yep, I thought the goal of the forum was to generate discussion. I thought all the posts about Lance stuff is doing the same. Oh well, we know how ST works. Attack.

.

Just an FYI, Dan has posted, a couple times actually, that we should only post part of the article and link to the rest. ST could be held liable for copyright infringements if members post entire articles.

FOURTH THING: Linking/sharing copyrighted material. If you want to share information you’ve found on another site, please abide by the following rules:

Article - please only post a snippet of the article; do not post the article in it’s entirely. Always provide a link to the original article, whether you are quoting a snippet (and that’s all you want/need) or whether you wish to discuss the entire article.

Example:

In a companion piece to this one, what I’ve hoped to show is that the defining fit characteristics of bikes are no longer solely contained in the frame. A “56cm” bike is no longer adequate or even an applicable description of the size of bike you ride. At least, not in triathlon.http://www.slowtwitch.com/...nd_spacers_1840.html

Is that guy’s name REALLY Dick Pound?

What a doorknob. He sounds just like Carl Lewis. Accusing an athlete based on improved times is slander & nothing more. Why didn’t he question the women’s 4 x 100 WR team? What about Phelps & countless others?

What was old is now new again. Let’s wait for another Jess Willard to come along.

Here we go again. Casting doubt, baseless, ignorant speculation. Reporter with nothing better to write about so, let’s throw some shit at the fan, i’ll get a useless debate and generate some traffic/attention to the website/publication, that should justify my job for another few months.
Where’s the “responsible skepticism” articles about Phelps, Ledeky, the ladies of the track relay team, etc?
Why aren’t these “journalists” ever held accountable for all this baseless crap?