Internet seems divided on whether or not it’s possible. For their part, Quarq only says “The Quarq DFour DUB power meter was designed and tested for use only with the 11-speed Dura-Ace R9100 drivetrain. “ but doesn’t rule out that it’s possible.
Trying to figure out what to run for power on my new incoming Factor Ostro with R9200 and really don’t want to switch away from Quarq (given all of my power #s since I started using power are from Quarqs…).
Doesn’t help but I really hope a DFour 92 is coming out. The hook on the 91 to mate the 9100 chainrings isn’t very nice if you want to use other 110x4 rings from what I’ve found.
It will work but cosmetically the rings won’t line up perfectly since the DFour has the 9100 DA design to it. It’s the same thing if you took Ultegra rings to the DFour.
It will work but cosmetically the rings won’t line up perfectly since the DFour has the 9100 DA design to it. It’s the same thing if you took Ultegra rings to the DFour.
Depending on your retentiveness then it’s completely unacceptable to run the non matching rings from aesthetic/aero or it’s not an issue whatsoever that anyone ever notices.
I’m in the latter FWIW
Maybe SRAM won’t do it after the snit between the two companies over the Hammerhead computer and compatibility with Shimano gear?
That’s what I’m worried about, lol. Shimano getting petty with SRAM, turnabout is certainly fair play.
FWIW I couldn’t care less about aesthetic matching. So it sounds like I should be good. But there are more than a few videos and commenters saying it “can’t†be done that had me scratching my head as to whether or not that hook flourish actually prevented the chainrings from bolting in.
Internet isn’t split on this one. There are plenty confirmations and pictures of this setup. It works. As mentioned, the shaping just doesn’t line up.