Why do people who are fans of Frodeno turn so nasty when you disagree who is the goat? New the sport big fan of KB.
Isn’t Dave Scott the Goat? Mark Allen?
I’m just not seeing how is JF when others have done what he’s done and more? Please explain I’m trying to understand
To start with, triathlon is more than Ironman, at least for a lot of people. An Olympic title is regarded very highly and Scott and Allen never won it. Frodeno did. I think it’s harder to win both one Olympic title and one Ironman WC than it is to win 6 Ironman WC’s. But then again, I have zero authority to back this statement up
Scott and Allen never had the chance to race an OG triathlon unfortunately, the inclusion came too late. But Allen did win the OD world championship the same year he won his first Hawaii and that’s quite the achievement.
If I was a groupie, Frodeno and Allen would probably be my two equal heroes, but I’m not a big fan of that GOAT debate. How is it fair to compare different eras?
You almost have to compare the “GOAT” of the different eras…Olympics were not an option in tri during the Dave/Mark era, but Mark being the first EVER World Champion of the ITU…and yet, Dave beat Mark every damn time at Kona until the last meeting–where even adding “age grading” Dave still kicked his but. However, that doesn’t really matter in a championship race. Take time improvements due to equipment, variables such a position and nutrition of the eras, and increased competition…it’s hard to say how they would have survived in results today. We know the numbers in the sport were less back then and tri as a profession was not as widespread as it is today, and the incentives or payouts are better now. But as I said, Mark is NOT the best in Kona over Dave–he lost every time but one–and Dave was already possibly past his age peak but certainly trained better for the “Iron War” so it was his fastest. Even then, weather may have been the speed factor for those times as well.
On to short course…you have Gomez and AB who certainly did some amazing streaks of racing, Jan as well. There may be a couple others…back in the day the Big Four ruled about every race they did. Can’t discount their domination–but again, they were about it aside from Mike Pigg & maybe a couple others. Possibly Steve Fleck can shed some light on that era a bit better–I’m too young to have been in the thick of all that in its heyday (not calling you “old” Fleck, just you were in the thick of that era). Do we measure by Kona? No. Olympics or years unbeaten? No. The GOAT will always be changing titles as time goes on. There is a subjective aspect to that title–nobody is the authority on what qualifies it. Debate is probably irrelevant when you look at the 80’s, 90’s, 2000+ with so much changing in the sport. KB could be tossed in there as well for consideration of top all timers…but Jan also smashed him (regardles of leg cramp issues–it’s still a race)…at the US PTO with Jan being much older…so…who is to say? The measuring stick is never the same on the debate scale…