There have been a couple threads on collarbone (clavicle) fractures recently and I thought it appropriate this January 1, 2015 to further the discussion about this, the most commonly broken bone in the body…as I’m sure many of you have already found out.
In the not too distant past the overwhelming majority of these injuries were treated non-surgically. However, with the advent of better treatment options, a growing percentage are fixed surgically. In some studies this approaches 20%. One major benefit to surgery can be returning to sport sooner. Absolute indications for surgery would be open fractures (bone comes through skin), nerve involvement, and some feel multiple extremity involvement as well. It’s been said that repair “can be the best treatment option for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in competitive athletes early in the season but that not every clavicle fracture needs surgical fixation.”*
No one would undertake an operation without first understanding the potential complications like numbness at the incision site or irritation from the hardware since we have so little subcutaneous fat in that area. There are also small chances of infection, wound problems, delayed union, etc. Diabetics and those who use tobacco products predictably do worse. Early on in clavicle surgery the complication rate was significant with high reoperation rates, plate removal, etc. but these have come down.
My take: To me one of the major advantages of surgery in the setting of a displaced, shortened clavicle is putting it back together “the way it came from the factory.” In a sport where returning relatively normal shoulder mechanics for reproducible swim strokes are important, restoring anatomic length and rotation I believe essential. But if displacement is acceptable staying away from the OR would be preferable as healing is generally quite good. We understand that regardless of treatment, surgical or nonsurgical, some studies have shown a degree of shoulder girdle weakness for months afterwards, in some patients even a year post injury. With either method, the (hopefully short term) imbalance that stems from injury be it stiffness, weakness, pain, etc. can take a good while to work out.
So if you find yourself post-crash, cradling your arm with the other (in what Phil Liggett calls “the broken collarbone position” regularly while announcing the TdF), facing this decision, here are a few questions you would want answered to help decide what’s best for YOU:
- If I do have the operation, what are my specific risks, how long will I be in the hospital and how many of these operations have you done?
- If I don’t not have the operation what are my specific risks/benefits?
- When will I be able to use my arm, return to work, return to sport?
- Do I have some underlying bone weakness?
- Should I be taking calcium or vitamin D
- Should I be reading Slowtwitch.com on a more regular basis?
Hopefully this will be helpful to those of you in the coming months who are faced with this dilemma.
*AAOS Now