Thom wrote:
mattbk wrote:
I gave you specifics. You just have to have been paying attention. He literally lied that I said I was against paid maternity leave.
He didn't literally say that. He said you would argue against it. He was making a prediction, which may or may not turn out to be correct. Your other, "specifics" are just pointing to threads.
I guess we just have different definitions of specific.
That was his first mention of me after I questioed his argument about having paid maternity leave. So he mentioned me there as someone who is trying to argue it. We then had a back and forth after that where he kept demanding I defend my point against paid leave where I had to tell him 3-4 times in a row that I wasn't against it but that he was not presenting good arguments for anyone to make a reasonable conclusion (which is what the readers expect if there is to be value extracted from these arguments vs just slinging shit). He then went on to insinuate I was lying about not being against it and said his basis here was that everyone could read my posts, yet failed to show where I said I was against it. That is lying to try to make up fake strawman arguments that were not made. Sorry you are having trouble here but seems you did not read the whole thread.
Another lie lately was when he attributed real wage growth to Biden as a positive. However I showed him that nominal wages were down and the only reason real wages were up was because of massive prior inflation that was now dropping faster than wages were dropping. So wages are lower under Biden and he used varying inflation to hide this and lie about Biden raising wages. This is how he operates all the time. Tracking down his BS would be a full time job and I dont live here like many do.
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=8111489#p8111489