Has anyone had an opportunity to ride both the Zipp 900 and the Sub 9? I am planning on purchasing a disc and I am primarily looking at the 900 but if the Sub 9 is quite a bit better I may have up my budget a little.
have you considered a zipp 808 with a disc cover? per wheelbuilder’s test, it may beat 900/sub-9:
A covered 81mm deep wheel outperformed flat disc wheels in every wind condition. The covered Zipp 808 has less drag than the fastest disc wheel tested beyond 10 degrees of yaw.
have you considered a zipp 808 with a disc cover? per wheelbuilder’s test, it may beat 900/sub-9:
A covered 81mm deep wheel outperformed flat disc wheels in every wind condition. The covered Zipp 808 has less drag than the fastest disc wheel tested beyond 10 degrees of yaw.
disclosure: i own an FC808 rear as well as a Super9. i saw this chart from wheelbuilder a while back. i wonder how the covered wheel compares to the Super9. I was told --perhaps incorrectly–that the Super9 was essentially the “firecrest disc”.
i never tried the Sub9 but was told by some who had ridden both that the Super9 is a bit less comfortable but is faster in many frames…and perhaps suited for shorter events for some people.