How do you explain the plethora of cyclist v cyclist accidents at Clearwater? While your small Golden State race works, as you claim it has been safe in the past, it did not work in Clearwater.
I personally saw a major wreck when I was coming back on the out and back portion on the Campbell Causeway. It looked like a crash in the TDF. Multiple people went down, everyone behind had to stop, and nobdy stayed to help out.
I did not see the other wrecks; however, pretty much everyone I talked to saw at least one. So your theory doesn’t work across the board. Especially considering this was not a technical course at all. This was very straight and very flat, with a couple of turns in there. Accidents still happened. I am personally going to stay away from the races where they essentially permit drafting. I see no reason to return to Clearwater until they get it fixed or until I can get my run fast enough to race pro, where it was a fair race.
With that being said (regarding the pro race), if the race is more popular in the pro ranks next year, then expect there to be a huge group rolling into T2 together, and expect it to be much worse than Kona has ever seen, as there are no hills to create any separation. The best runners will win this race. It would be sweet to see a the World Championships rotated around the various 70. courses.
Ralphs would be a pretty sweet venue, especially considering the lumps on the second half of the run.
St. Croix would be sick
Timberman
Buffalo Springs has some legit hills
The Ensenada Mexio 70.3 race looks to be a really really hard course.
Vineman
Those are just a few in North America. I don’t understand the need to sign a 5 year agreement. I can see where Clearwater might want multiple years, but they could still have multiple years, just don’t host the Championship race there every year. If the contract says they must have a race, then have a race but make it a normal 70.3 race, just another qualifier for the Champ race somewhere else…