Why are we not talking about CdA sensors more?

I don’t just have one setup, I have a track setup, a TT setup and with the data I have gathered, I modify that setup depending on the course and conditions. An example; here I’m at Masters TT Worlds, This course had about 1,300 climbing and descending, so my position was more relaxed and I picked equipment that would work best for that day.

The largest improvements from my testing were made with helmet, skinsuit and shoe covers. I don’t want this thread to turn into my testing and how product A, beat product B. Likely my setup would produce a difference results for others, lets save this type of stuff for a different time and thread.

1 Like

And this heavy helmet was fastest ? :astonished_face:

However, nice vintage setup :heart_eyes:

Vintage is fast. At a low yaw angle aerodynamicist had stuff pretty much figured out 10-15 years ago. Stuff today is maximized to preform across a wider yaw angle and slower speeds. An example is the HED Trispoke, that wheel is from the 90’s and with the right sized tire is still a strong competitor at low yaw.

3 Likes

I have the Gibli sensor and I have found a ton of things, and a ton of things I thought would be something and just wasn’t. Helmets have a small difference for me. Suits, and position changes were very large changes. Sensor was difficult to get up and running at first, but mostly were issues with me and setup. Once you get it figured out its very easy.

3 Likes

I find older sock or overshoe more “reliable”. Year 2025 ribbed $250 overshoes ain’t crap of the stupid silicone piece has it slide down your leg. Never had my older Aerocoach ones do that. May those rest in peace after a crash.

I had to use half a can of Super 77 spray to get expensive rule 34 overshoes to stay on my danged calf.

I almost wish sometimes I knew how to tailor clothes.

1 Like