http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1319075,00.html
Ha ha! Yea. The Guardian. Now there’s an unbiased news source for you.
What do you call a person who straps explosives to their bodies and enters metropolitan areas with the goal of killing innocent civilians? Well, according to the Guardian, they’de be called freedom fighters.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1319075,00.html
Ha ha! Yea. The Guardian. Now there’s an unbiased news source for you.
What do you call a person who straps explosives to their bodies and enters metropolitan areas with the goal of killing innocent civilians? Well, according to the Guardian, they’de be called freedom fighters.
It’s actually news that i got from AFP (reading Le Monde)… since it was in french, I googled an English version. So, that’s two sources for ya
I wasn’t questioning the truthfulness of your quote, or the error in judgment of Fox news.
Now that’s good humor, Francois.
For the first time in my life, I visited the Fox News web site the day after the debate to see what spin they put on it, and I saw that article. I couldn’t believe that Kerry had actually said the quotes in the article (“metrosexual”?!?).
Fox News is a scumbag organization. The fact that their chief political correspondent would actually write that, post it, and no editor questioned it speaks volumes for the quality of their organization. “Fair and balanced”. What a crock.
I did note that even Fox News couldn’t spin their way to a good Bush debate performance.
Fox News is a scumbag organization. The fact that their chief political correspondent would actually write that, post it, and no editor questioned it speaks volumes for the quality of their organization.
Fox news is a rag. But they sure managed to fess up a lot quicker than CBS did, didn’t they? If it had been Rather’s article, we would have heard 10 days of justification- “the article is made-up, but really indicative of higher truths.”
This is a bad time for liberals to be picking on Fox news, Ken.
Fox news is a rag. But they sure managed to fess up a lot quicker than CBS did, didn’t they? If it had been Rather’s article, we would have heard 10 days of justification- “the article is made-up, but really indicative of higher truths.”
This is a bad time for liberals to be picking on Fox news, Ken.
Apples and oranges. CBS News had something which could have been legitimate. Fox News had something that didn’t pass the laugh test.
Apples and oranges.
Yeah, probably true. Fox mistakenly posted an article written as a joke and not intended for publication, then removed it and immediately apologized for the mix-up. CBS deliberately foisted questionable documents on the American public in an attempt to influence the presidential election, then attempted desperately to maintain their core accusation long after the documents had been discredited as forgeries.
Apples and oranges, indeed.
CBS is not my most popular network right now. First, the whole document scandal with Bush’s records. Now, they pull the 60-minutes story about WMD’s, which apparently was highly critical of the current administration. The reasoning was that they didn’t want to air the report so close to the election…uhh…why did they air the other story then?
The difference is that the Fox news piece was supposed to be satire and accidentally got posted as news. When the error was realized, it was retracted, and apology issued. CBS took a forgery, didn’t verify its sources, claimed it was news and ran with it for two weeks before claiming that the document might be a forgery, but was truthful anyway.
Why is it that defenders of Fox News feel that a valid defense is “CBS is worse”? Who gives a rat’s ass about CBS, when the subject is Fox News?
Because it’s so freaking obvious that people are trying to spin a harmless mistake by Fox News- one quickly corrected and apologized for- in order to divert attention from CBS’s misdeed.
The Fox thing is a non-story. You’re trying to make sound worse than it is. Wonder why?
Comparing things is a good way to find out the truth. It’s called rational inquiry. Not something seen at CBS, or, for that matter, in the vast majority of positions that its affiliate, Senator Kerry, takes on Iraq.
Since when do you care about the truth?
Because I’m biased (having went through SEAL training in '83, and having also spent a lot of time as a Navy corpsman with Marine reconnaissance forces), I’m going to have to disagree, naturally, with the GIGN being equivalent to SEAL teams (especially Navy Special Warfare Development Group…also known as Team 6).
I was impressed, though, with your fellows from 2nd REP of the Legion, however. The ones that went on to commando training. We did some observation of their training in French Guyana some years back. Good guys.
I’m sure they’d acquit themselves well in battle. If they were ever allowed to fight 
I’m sure that you understand, mon ami 
Antoine
If I recall correctly, Fox News didn’t bother to apologize when they were caught publicizing a doctored photo showing Kerry and Jane Fonda together, despite the fact that it came from a highly dubious source. So I think a little bit of a double-standard is at work here.
I know a Fox News producer. She admits that the organization is a joke and that the notion of unbiasedness is a complete farce. Not that it’s not obvious, but when you hear it from the horse’s mouth, it’s even more convincing.
“I know a Fox News producer. She admits that the organization is a joke and that the notion of unbiasedness is a complete farce.”
I said before, even if Fox leans to the right, so what? The right/republicans have to contend with a lot of bullshit like CBS (and the liberal bias of practically all conventional media outlets w/ the exception of Fox), Michael Moore, The UN, The music and entertainment industry is notoriously liberal and anti-Bush ‘bush-hitler’ crowd, Moveon.org, etc etc.
The right has some victories; Talkradio, Swiftvets, favorable reporting from Fox, ‘the pajamahadeenin the blogosphere’ the CBS blunder and others.
The notion that the left needs to have a monopoly on all forms of media to advance their message is crazy, I think that the battle to win hearts and minds is pretty evenly matched.
I don’t get why everyone makes this a partisan issue. ALL American media is a big steaming pile of shit. This includes the 3 majors, as well as the cable outlets.
Our news outlets are not NEWS outlets, they are mouthpieces for a specific narrow agenda reflecting corporate ownership. That’s all. They practice the age-old art of divide and rule, not uniting the nation to come up with a list of national priorities, nor do they do a single thing about ensuring transparency or accountability in our government. CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, you name them, they all suck hard.
Rupert Murdoch, GE, et al are laughing with tears running down their faces all the way to the bank.