Ok. Got the wife a new bike and she asked how much it weighs. I didn’t know, so out came the bathroom scale (highly scientific, I know).
Weighed me, weighed her bike w/ lights, saddle bag, etc. in at 22lbs.
Grabbed my P3Al as preped for a sprint this Sunday (See photo).
19.1lbs
My question is, and I am not a weight weenie at all, what do our bikes really weigh when we race them and why do we still talk about 100 grams like it makes a difference.
Sorry for the wheels not being properly aligned, being in the wrong display gearing, not vacuuming the carpet, for the shiny license sticker, and for some of the bricks not being properly colored.
We spend inordinate amounts of time and money on the details of bicycle weight because it is an easily measured parameter. It is also easy to make sense of the concept that light weight equals saved time and effort. Regardless of the validity of that concept, the measurement of such things is pleasurable, so we measure.
It is concrete - change out a component for a lighter component - instantly measured therefore instantly faster and better. .
MUCH easier than weighing your body, which can change from day to day based simply on time of day and food intake. Much more satisfying to lift your newly lightened bike than to stand on your scale and reveal a .5 pound decrease, knowing it can go back up the very next day! That won’t happen on your bike.
Why then, do we not extrapolate this weight weenie argument to our running shoes? Does it not make sense that a shoe weighing only 1 ounce less than other results in a pound of savings in only 16 footsteps? We might be lifting thousands of pounds of unnecessary weight!
BTW, 15.6…