“I have not been keeping up-to-date on TH. Is he still proclaiming his innocence?”
Taken from Tyler’s website:
http://www.tylerhamilton.com/qa2236.html
From Kelly/Utah:: Tyler, It is time to quit playing the game that so many professional athletes have been and are still playing - taking steriods or blood doping and getting caught and then denying that they did anything wrong. If the phantom twin defense was your best defense, then you didn’t have a chance. Just admit it and move on and we’ll still be behind you!
Tyler: Thanks for taking the time to voice your opinion on my website. Just to set the record straight, the authors of the homologous blood test methodology listed a handful of instances where the test could register a false positive. One of them was chimerism which stems in some case from the vanishing twin phenomenon. It sounds like a wacky prospect on the surface, but it’s a real enough phenomenon that the scientists who invented the test listed it as a cause for concern.
Never, ever once, during my defense did I claim to have a vanishing twin. However, we did point out that since the authors of the test methodology never did a false positive study that they could not conclusively rule test results indicating mixed populations were actually mixed populations. It’s a standard practice in the scientific community for researchers to determine the false positive rate for every test. Every test fails to a certain degree. However, in this case, the authors of the test did not have the time, materials or funding to conduct a false positive study. So, they were never able to determine the rate at which the test does actually fail.
What we do know is that 10-15 other athletes have generated false positive test results while the HBT test was in use in 2004. They believe it was either faulty equipment or poor performing materials used to run the test that generated those results, and never charged the athletes.
Somehow the media ran with the story that my defense was based on chimerism and vanishing twin - however, this is simply not the case. My defense was based on the fact that my test results were conflicting lab to lab and test to test, we uncovered documents from the labs who ran my tests stating they did not believe the test was being implemented properly and that there were concerns about time, funding and materials and finally, the expert testimony of the world’s most credible scientists who stated the test was incomplete and the results were false positives. One of my witnesses even defected from the initial scientific team to state the test was inadequate and the results were meaningless.
I’m sorry you feel frustration toward my case and situation, however, you should also know that I will never admit to doing something I didn’t do. Not today, not ever. But I appreciate your letting me respond, and hope I’ve been informative.