What’s your point? AGW believers are just as likely to say the same thing in a quarter-century or so, it seems to me.
BK
oh man…I don’t believe in man made GW…but THAT was freakin’ great!
Felt like an Abbot and Costello routine.
Thanks for sharing!
I don’t think it relates to your thread title, but that was funny.
It does…I was drawing a parallel between the level of understanding of statistical modeling on this forum, and the understanding of statistics (testing etc.) of the guy being interviewed 
Ok, it was a bit far-fetched, but I needed a good title for that interesting piece on youtube 
.
“What’s your point? AGW believers are just as likely to say the same thing in a quarter-century or so, it seems to me.”
That’s not true. They would say we should stop using all ships immediately, because would you get on a plane if there was a 50/50 chance it would crash?
This gives me great confidence in the measuring of the ice caps.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=aIe9swvOqwIY
Dude, you know that is a comedy show right? (and it is old)
Why so happy to accept this data while claiming climate scientists (probably the same ones involved with admitting this icecap measurement error) are wrong about everything else?
I’m not accepting anything. I just thought it was funny. “Oh, the sensor moved so we are not sure if any of the data is actually accurate.”
Yes, because all the GW research relies on that unique sensor…