as one forum member posted, the book of acts, chapter 2, refers to those who “spoke in other tongues.” if you’re “full gospel” or “pentecostal” you believe this is a miracle (like healing the sick) that is part of what makes up your faith (this is part of the “evidence of things not seen”).
if you’re a baptist, among other denominations, you believe that these miraculous manifestations were limited to that particular time, immediately post-resurrection, that helped congeal and coalesce the early church. these miracles were god’s kick start. but they faded as the church matured (that’s what baptists and methodists and lutherans and most of the rest of christianty believes).
by “full gospel” what these denominations believe (and we’re talking primarily “assembly of god” and “foursquare” churches) is that the rest of protestantism denies that part of the bible specific to these miracles or “gifts.” pentecostals refer to paul’s letters to the early churches, where he delineates these gifts, among them “speaking in tongues” and the “interpretation” of these utterances. so, in a pentecostal church service, you’ve got two types of this manifestation. you’ve got your garden variety pew sitter quietly speaking in tongues, and then you’ve got your occasional “announcement” in tongues, which is sort of an oration to the congregation. then everybody sort of sits quietly waiting, and another person gives the “interpretation”, all in accordance with the gifts paul writes about.
if you’ve got a particularly uncreative church you’re dealing with, the interpretation often or invariably falls along the lines of II chronicles 2:14: “if my people, who are called by my name, humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then i will hear from heaven, will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” blah blah blah.
what these people believe is that you are “born again.” fair enough. then, however, there’s a “second blessing,” and this is to be “filled with the holy spirit.” that’s what this gal is looking for.
now, pardon me, i’m sticking my two cents in here, but you asked for it: me, if i were you, i’d be careful. if this is what she wants, this is what she’ll get. and you are always going to be sucking hind tit, on the outside looking in, and she and her church will always look at you as a sort of spiritual mongoloid. there will be things you just can never understand, because you’ve got the spiritual IQ of 70, while they’ve got the holy spirit in them. you’re going to heaven, perhaps, but just barely. i wouldn’t like to be thought of that way, especially by somebody that i cared a lot for. i would not want my significant other to think of me as a spiritual lesser.