OK dissenters, explain this story which I recently received:
19 YO male, distance runner since the 5th grade (so he has a good aerobic base) who takes up full-time cycling in jan 2003 due to injury from running. His father reports "He raced in category 4 and had
good success, won some races and posted a 57:47 40K time trial (using a
stock bike with aero bars attached) on a legitimate course. To help him take his training further, we acquired a powertap pro for his
bike, and on September 21st he did a “Carmichael field test” to
establish a baseline and averaged 338 watts for his two 3 mile efforts. On
December 30th he started riding on his Powercranks. Just yesterday (May 12th) I finally got him to duplicate the Carmichael field test and he averaged 392 watts, a 16% improvement. He is racing category 3 this year and has been fortunate enough to win a weekend stage race, by winning all three of the stages! His time trial results show he is competitive with local Cat 1 and Cat 2 racers. "
So what, i can hear everyone say, a 16% improvement in a novice 5 months after starting PC’s! What is the big deal? This is clearly just training effect and placebo.
Oh, forgot one thing. The rest of the story …
“On November 10th of last year this young man was struck by a car while riding his bike. His head punched a hole in the windshield of the car that
struck him, and he was brought to the emergency room in critical condition. He was alive only because he was wearing his helmet. He was unconscious for 4 days, stayed in the hospital a total of 9 days, spent the next 7 days in a rehab hospital, and continued his therapy on an outpatient basis after that. It is hoped Daniel will have a full recovery, both physically and mentally, but the most severe physical injury was weakness in his left arm and left leg. He literally had to learn to walk again. In the rehab hospital he couldn’t ride a stationary bike more than about 10-15 minutes before becoming totally exhausted. This finally brings me to your
powercranks.”
Anyhow, his father got him the PC’s as a rehabilitation tool.
The boy was “brought home on Thanksgiving morning and he immediately
wanted to ride on a trainer. We let him, as long as he wore a helmet! Needless to say, his efforts were very short and he needed recovery days between rides. I brought up the subject of Powercranks to Daniel, let him read the research and reviews I had found, and told him it would take a big commitment on his part and a lot of time (so I thought) before he would see the benefits. On December 30th he took his first Powercranks ride on the trainer. While he was able to last longer than I thought he would, it still wasn’t a pretty sight. He could tell “his left leg wasn’t doing any of the work”. As you would expect the focus of his training from that point forward has been trying to regain his endurance, stamina, and coordination.”
I’ve read on a number of forums people (i.e., the non-users) think the
benefit of Powercranks comes from the additional motivation to train
harder than you did without them (people have to justify the investment they made, new toy, etc.). In other words the benefit is coming from increased volume and/or intensity of training, not the powercranks. Granted my son’s story is far from a scientific study, but I hope it would be obvious he started from something far below his previous level of fitness, and I assure you he is still not able to put as much time on the bike as he did before, and is not able to train at the intensity he did before the accident. His left side is still weaker than his right side."
OK folks, explain that if they are just placebo effect, or efficiency means nothing, or all the other objections. OK, I accept it is just an anecdotal report and to draw any conclusions we need to do a randomized study of young bike raceers who go through windshields and are unconscious for a week and come out with severe left or right sided weakness.



