Rushbo

I’ll pre-empt this by stating that I think a strong, fiscaly conservative and relatively moderate Republican party will be good for America. Unfortunately we seemed to have lost that and in the midst of the collapse of the Republican party, only those who seem to be the biggest poison in the game are rising to the top.

I’d like to see more of the old Gingrich, the old McCain, the Santorums, and the Romneys gain control of the party, but unfortunately they seem to be turning more toward Hannity, Coulter, and yes…Rushbo.

Interesting article:

Gold Rush: Dems launch Operation Rushbo Buzz Up Send Email IM Share Delicious Digg Facebook Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Bookmarks Print Jonathan Martin Jonathan Martin – Wed Mar 4, 4:04 am ET Featured Topics: Barack Obama Presidential Transition http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090304/capt.d5f81ec7d95242668da40bbdaecc9313.politics_foils_ny124.jpg?x=213&y=164&xc=1&yc=1&wc=409&hc=315&q=85&sig=6gu5nFIzW4dkH77ITHBF2A-- AP – In this Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2009 picture, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh talks with guests in … http://d.yimg.com/a/p/cbs_local/20090225/videolthumb.83fd00b12369223afb8525b521808c3c.jpg?x=50&y=50&xc=89&yc=1&wc=225&hc=225&q=85&sig=wTKHav33JOaM.r2uPI_L.g-- Play Video Presidential Transition Video:Raw: Obama names Gary Locke as Commerce secretary KING5 Seattle http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090227/videolthumb.e8f23a1f8af9ff6d602ec1daecc6cf03.jpg?x=50&y=50&xc=51&yc=1&wc=300&hc=300&q=85&sig=Gta3ypqn_44Anbi7JljX3w-- Play Video Presidential Transition Video:Obama names Gary Locke Commerce secretary AP
Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.
The strategy took shape after Democrats included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.
"The Administration is enabling me,” he wrote in an email to POLITICO. “They are expanding my profile, expanding my audience and expanding my influence. An ever larger number of people are now being exposed to the antidote to Obamaism: conservatism, as articulated by me. An ever larger number of people are now exposed to substantive warnings, analysis and criticism of Obama’s policies and intentions, a ‘story’ I own because the is largely the Obama Press Office.”
The bigger, the better, agreed Democrat James Carville. “It’s great for us, great for him, great for the press,” he said of Limbaugh. “The only people he’s not good for are the actual Republicans in Congress.”

If Limbaugh himself were to coin a phrase for it, he might call it Operation Rushbo – an idea that started out simply enough but quickly proved to be deeply resonant by a rapid succession of events, say Democrats inside and outside the West Wing.

The seeds were planted in October after Democracy Corps, the Democratic polling company run by Carville and Stanley Greenberg, included Limbaugh’s name in a survey and found that many Americans just don’t like him.

“His positives for voters under 40 was 11 percent,” Carville recalled with a degree of amazement, alluding to a question about whether voters had a positive or negative view of the talk show host.

Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, said they found Limbaugh’s overall ratings were even lower than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s controversial former pastor, and William Ayers, the domestic terrorist and Chicago resident who Republicans sought to tie to Obama during the campaign.

Then came what Begala called “the tripwire.”
“I hope he fails,” Limbaugh said of Obama on his show four days before the president was sworn in. It was a time when Obama’s approval ratings were soaring, but more than that, polls showed even people who didn’t vote for him badly wanted him to succeed, coming to office at a time of economic meltdown.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was the first to jump on the statement, sending the video to its membership to raise cash and stir a petition drive.
“We helped get the ball rolling on this because we’re looking and listening to different Republican voices around the country, and the one that was the loudest and getting the most attention was Rush Limbaugh,” explained DCCC chairman and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.)

Soon after, Americans United for Change, a liberal group, was airing Limbaugh’s statement in an ad aimed at pushing Senate Republicans to support the stimulus bill.
“It just cropped up out of how much play that comment was getting on the air,” said Brad Woodhouse, who runs the group and is about to take over as communications director at the Democratic National Committee. “When we did it and it generated so much press, it just started to snowball from there.”
But liberals quickly realized that trying to drive a wedge between congressional Republicans and Limbaugh was unlikely to work, and their better move was to paint the GOP as beholden to the talk show host.

This was driven home to them, according to one Democrat, when Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) took a shot at Limbaugh in late January only to appear on his program the next day and plead having momentarily had “foot-in-mouth disease.”

By February, Carville and Begala were pounding on Limbaugh frequently in their appearances on CNN.
Neither Democrat would say so, but a third source said the two also began pushing the idea of targeting Limbaugh in their daily phone conversations with Emanuel.
Conversations and email exchanges began taking place in and out of the White House not only between the old pals from the Clinton era but also including White House senior adviser David Axelrod, Deputy Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Woodhouse.
The White House needed no more convincing after Limbaugh’s hour-plus performance Saturday, celebrated on the right and mocked on the left, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, where he re-stated his hope Obama fails.

“He kicked this into full-gear at CPAC by reiterating it,” said a senior White House official of Limbaugh.
By Sunday morning, Emanuel elevated the strategy by bringing up the conservative talker, unprompted, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and calling him the “the voice and the intellectual force and energy behind the Republican Party.”

Even Republican National Chairman Michael Steele joined in with a surprising critique of Limbaugh as a mere “entertainer,” who is “ugly” and “incendiary.”
“He took a little match we had tossed on the leaves and poured gasoline on it,” said one Democrat of Steele.

Steele was forced into calling Limbaugh to apologize Monday, an embarrassing climb-down following the RNC chairman’s criticism of the conservative talk-show host.
But Democrats kept at it in rapid-fire succession, thrilled that Steele had validated their claim that Republicans were scared to cross Limbaugh.
Americans United for Change launched a new ad featuring Limbaugh’s CPAC appearance. A left-leaning media watchdog group began a new Limbaugh tracking homepage. Democratic National Chairman Tim Kaine tweaked Steele for his apology. Terry McAuliffe tried to inject Limbaugh into the Virginia governor’s race. The DCCC launched a new website, www.imsorryrush.com, mocking the Republicans who have had to apologize to Limbaugh.

And Gibbs served up a made-for-cable-TV quote to end his daily briefing Tuesday.

“I was a little surprised at the speed in which Mr. Steele, the head of the RNC, apologized to the head of the Republican Party,” Gibbs quipped with a grin, before striding out of the press room.

David Plouffe, Obama’s campaign manager last year and a member of his inner circle still, will publish an op-ed in Wednesday’s Washington Post chiding Republicans for being “paralyzed with fear of crossing their leader.”

A senior White House aide has been tasked with helping to guide the Limbaugh strategy.

Outside, Americans United for Choice, a liberal group, and the Democratic National Committee are driving the message, in close consultation with the White House.
Democrats can barely suppress their smiles these days, overjoyed at the instant-ad imagery of Limbaugh clad in Johnny Cash-black at CPAC and, more broadly, at what they see as their success in managing to further marginalize a party already on the outs.

“I want to send Rush a bottle of vitamins,” said Begala. “We need him to stay healthy and loud and proud.”
With President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney out of the White House and Tom DeLay gone from Congress, the left had been suddenly absent an unpopular right-wing figure.

Few Americans know who the congressional Republican leaders are. Even Sarah Palin is now four time zones away from Washington.
Enter Limbaugh.

It’s something of a back to the future tactic for Democrats: painting the GOP as the party of the angry white male. But unlike Newt Gingrich or other prominent Republicans, Limbaugh doesn’t have to mind his tongue.

And the liberal political apparatus is at battle stations taking note of his every comment.
Media Matters, the left-leaning media watchdog and advocacy group, began a “Limbaugh Wire” web-site Tuesday to track him. “For a long time Americans haven’t really been aware that he’s so influential,” said Eric Burns, the group’s president.
Democrats are now working hard to ensure that changes.

“He’s driving the Republican reluctance to deal with Obama, which Americans want,” said Greenberg. “He’s the policeman .”
They’ll all get a fresh hook for the story after Wednesday, when a Democratic polling firm goes into the field to test, among other things, Limbaugh’s standing with the public.

All the attention only offers upside for the buzz-hungry Limbaugh, said Carville.
“The television cameras just can’t stay away from him,” Carville said Tuesday, a day when cable news played images of Limbaugh seemingly on a loop. “Our strategy depends on him keeping talking, and I think we’re going to succeed.”

From the little I have heard from Rush (and it’s hard considering how loud he is), anyone who thinks that Rush is out for the good of the USA, is REALLY delusional. Rush is out for Rush.

I “hoped” for “change” but all I see if more Clintonian bullshit.

This is beyond dividing and conquering and already beaten foe, it is silencing the opposition in a disturbing, fascist kind of way.

This is so silly and could backfire on the democrats. Rush can’t get anyone elected. They are the one’s who are elevating Rush…Rush is just responding to them…which I guess is part of the grand plan to keep them in power. This in not about whats best for our country, this is a political strategy and character assasination…and is a perfect example of what it wrong in our country.

They are walking right into the web.Suckers
.

Just like Obama is looking out for Obama.

Personally I hope they continue operation Rushbo. I think it will eventually backfire for a couple of reasons. They are only my personal opinions so no need to try to debate them as fact, because I am not trying to present them as such.

  1. I think there are alot more people that listen to and like Rush than they think. Alot of people realize that he is an entertainer and alot of what he says is designed to be over the top. They also understand the underlying points he is trying to make. Its only the already hardened dems or libs that focus solely on the over the top antics and ignore the actual point. They get all up in arms, wring their hands and moan about what a satan he is. Those people would never vote for a conservative or a republican anyway.

  2. I think Rush is a hell of alot smarter than Obama and his ilk. He will out play the playas.

  3. By turning their attention to Rush, they are taking their eyes off of the ball.

I “hoped” for “change” …

No you didn’t. You are an admitted Rush supporter and have even posted stuff from him as being “spot on.” The reality is, Rush is bad for the Republicans and he is bad for America.

I do agree that I don’t like the play that the Democrats are making, but it is a reasonable play that you could expect from any party trying to maintain power, and certainly no more slimey than the BS Karl Rove pulled off.

What NEEDS to happen is for you and your kind to give everyone else a reason for why this idea shouldn’t stick. Unfortunately, it DOES stick. Stop giving us Palin and Limbaugh and maybe you will get some of us swing voters back.

It’s crazy that the Dems expend this much energy on Rush. They are surely not focused on the economic situation. Rush is getting to them and they know it.

  1. I think Rush is a hell of alot smarter than Obama and his ilk. He will out play the playas.

You think Rush is Ivy League Suma Cum Laude smart? Really? Or did you mean “smart” in a different way…like smart enough to get fired as an NFL commentator at Fox? ; ^ )

I read the article in the Post regarding this. First, it’s interesting to note how negative Rush is viewed by the country. How does openly hoping for Obama to fail help the GOP? That’s asking for the country to slide into a depression. This will haunt the GOP.

I read that and found it interesting. I don’t care for Carville, but he is shrewd. I think he and Rush are different sides of the same coin.

Let me get this out of the way. I guess this is the Change that Obama promised. It is change; it is dirtier than previous administrations.

Here is my take on it. They can’t (yet) stop the conservative voices with the so-called “Fairness Doctrine”, so they’re appealing to the people who have never or rarely listened to Rush. I think the reason they’re attacking so strongly is because Rush and others are the loudest voices in the media who are pointing out all the “crap” that the Obama administration is pushing on us. If they can silence Rush, or hurt the GOP opposition, they’ll have more power to push more crap our way. The so-called lovers of the first amendment are doing they’re best to silence their detractors. That, to me, shows their true colors.

This is the best thing that Rush could hope for. His ratings will skyrocket, and he’ll make more money. I’m not sure that it won’t eventually backfire on the Democrats as their policies fail and they burden the American public by sending more money after bad money.

The Democrats are (with their power) like my 13 year old daughter when I gave her $40 for food for a 1 1/2 day trip. She blew it all with no regard for wise spending. But unlike her - they won’t have to pay it back because it was foolishly spent.

As far as your statement about the “old Gingrich”. I think the nation needs to find someone else like him who (despite personal failings) has a plan and actually accomplishes something positive.

To be honest with you (and I never thought I would say this , especially after Bill Clinton) I could overlook some personal issues as long as the person was a leader. I have a good friend who built a very successful business, despite the fact that he cheated on his wife. I’d vote for someone like him, as long as they had a track record of business (not political) success.

I read the article in the Post regarding this. First, it’s interesting to note how negative Rush is viewed by the country. How does openly hoping for Obama to fail help the GOP? That’s asking for the country to slide into a depression. This will haunt the GOP.

Not according to the people posting here. Apparently he has a lot more support than we think. I think neo-cons often forget that stupid rednecks still only get one vote each.

I read the article in the Post regarding this. First, it’s interesting to note how negative Rush is viewed by the country. How does openly hoping for Obama to fail help the GOP? That’s asking for the country to slide into a depression. This will haunt the GOP.

Not according to the people posting here. Apparently he has a lot more support than we think. I think neo-cons often forget that stupid rednecks still only get one vote each.
This forum is not representative of the American people (they are to well educated and good looking. ;). I don’t think that many here want Obama to fail because they understand the dire consequences of failure.

I read the article in the Post regarding this. First, it’s interesting to note how negative Rush is viewed by the country. How does openly hoping for Obama to fail help the GOP? That’s asking for the country to slide into a depression. This will haunt the GOP.

It comes down to how do you define failure for Obama. In this instance, failure for Obama means he doesn’t get any of his grand liberal plans enacted.

Now move one more logical step and try to understand what alot of people believe about his liberal agenda. Alot of us beleive that that agenda will bankrupt our country and push it into a true depression. We also believe that the best thing for our country is to allow the economy to fix itself and that by spending trillions of dollars that we don’t have will only make it worse.

So yeah, we not only hope for Obama’s failure, we pray for it.

I read the article in the Post regarding this. First, it’s interesting to note how negative Rush is viewed by the country. How does openly hoping for Obama to fail help the GOP? That’s asking for the country to slide into a depression. This will haunt the GOP.

Not according to the people posting here. Apparently he has a lot more support than we think. I think neo-cons often forget that stupid rednecks still only get one vote each.

Barry, you’re crossing a fine line here. I’ll be the first to call you outside if you keep this language up.

You’ve exposed yourself. My redneck flag is flying higher now.
Kai

** The reality is, Rush is bad for the Republicans and he is bad for America.**

I agree with this statement, but I disagree with your assertion that Rush does not have America’s interest at heart. Of course he has America’s interest at heart (as well as his own, obviously; he’s an American and a Capitolist; this is the last best hope for people like him, and people who aspire to his level of prosperity), he simply believes in a different cure for what ails us, because he believes, like most people, he’s figured out what’s made us sick to begin with. I don’t begrudge him, or anyone on this forum or elsewhere, for passionately fighting for what they believe. It’s how they fight that I take issue with, and is part of what I believe is ailing our nation: dividing everything down a partisan line, creating an Us vs. Them mentality, Patriots vs. Anti-Americans, etc, etc. Rush, Palin, Hannity, Olbermann, et. al., fervently believe in what they’re selling, but they refuse to acknowledge the damage they do in the name of Patriotism.

“he is bad for America.”

Stop it. That is the A #1 least thought out thing you have ever said. Please tell me how Limbaugh is bad for America.

"Unfortunately, it DOES stick. Stop giving us Palin and Limbaugh and maybe you will get some of us swing voters back. "

No one has given you Palin and Limbaugh because Limbaugh is not running for anything. Swing voters are worthless. The Republicans lost for 2 big reasons…

  1. You can’t beat Obama. Presidential politics is not about achievement or ideas it’s about image and Obama is a fucking rock star.

  2. McCain and Palin. The base hated McCain before the election and contrary to what everyone thinks Palin bugs a lot of the Republican party. So while a lot of Republicans voted for McCain because he wasn’t on the other team a lot of moderate Republicans stayed home because the choices where so bad.

So go ahead and attack Limbaugh. Help his lovers love im more and his haters hate him more. This is why this country is becoming a joke. Ideas are dead because we care more about radio talkers then whats going on around us.

“I think neo-cons often forget that stupid rednecks still only get one vote each.”

That is awesome! You have now proven that you behave just like the guy your fighting against.

How is Limbaugh bad for America?

"It’s how they fight that I take issue with, and is part of what I believe is ailing our nation: dividing everything down a partisan line, creating an Us vs. Them mentality, "

And the Democrats don’t use this tactic? Forget the team for once and focus on the process. Both sides use the same tactics and cry like bitches when they are used against themselves. This whole crusade against Limbaugh proves that no one in the parties cares about truth they care about power.