If the cutoff was 12 hours, maybe I’d try and maybe I wouldn’t - but far fewer people would do it overall. I don’t think I’ll ever be in shape to make 10 hours.
I never said anyone who finishes at 17 hours is out of shape - or that they didn’t accomplish an impressive feat. They certainly did so. My issue has to do with the idea of “paying your dues” - which I think ought to be done with a logical buildup of experience to suit the nature of the race. You, Andrew, and probably others will disagree. Both you and Andrew stated that you had the opportunity to do the IM, so you took it. I commend you. But what do you do for an encore? Perhaps you better your time, do other IM races, or try to qualify for Hawaii. Best of luck to you. But my original post raised the issue of: Why do people feel the need to move so quickly to the highest level of this sport?
I am involved with triathlon because I love training and competing in all 3 sports, and I like being in great shape. I discovered this by experiencing triathlon at its beginner level - sprint racing. On the contrary, I think that perhaps some that decide to do an ironman right away, entering the sport at its highest level, are doing so to check off a box on their goal list, or perhaps to settle a bet, as slick stated. Nothing wrong with that, but perhaps “ironman” in that sense should be considered a different sport than “triathlon”.