Power2max vs Garmin Vector

I’m currently using a wired powertap, Lemond Revolution Trainer with Power Pilot, and 150mm cranks (would’ve gone with Quarq if they had that option).

To simplify my training/race day options, I’ve narrowed it down to Power2max and the Vector.

I’m leaning towards the Vector just because I’ve heard a story of an athlete that checked his calibration on a new one and found it off by 6%, but Power2max’s support was unwilling to accept his measurement. I don’t think this is very common, but that’s a bit worrisome.

Based on user feedback, Vectors seem to be very sensitive to torque values. I won’t be swapping the pedals to different bikes, so it will be a set it and forget it type installation.

Any thoughts?

Haven’t used the Vector but have been riding a Power2Max for past couple months. So far it has been as consistent and reliable as former SRM.

No experience with power2max, but I like my vectors. Install can be a PITA but not too bad and I’ve gotten good, reliable data. Even though you don’t plan on changing between bikes, it’s nice that you can. I recently had to switch to my tribike for IMMT because my Quarq died a week before the race. Love my Quarq, too, and great customer service.

No problems at all with my P2max. Had it since January

IMO…Pedals wear out, Chainrings wear out. Less expensive to replace chainrings than special pedals.

jaretj

Another one with a P2M. Haven’t had an issue yet… the thing just works.

People generally nothing but good things to say about power2max though there is controversy around their dynamic calibration method among power gurus (read the google wattage forum). You might not care about that type of thing, but those types feel it affects comparability of results across PMs.

I love my vectors. They have been spot on accurate when compared on a computrainer, and as long as you have the right tools (beam torque wrench and crowfoot adapter) they are very easy to get on. There is a lot of noise about the need to get the torque right, but I have had absolutely no problems.

No experience with the Power2Max, but the Vectors I was given have performed quite well. Installation in particular is much easier in practice than on paper.

FWIW, one difference between the two options is that the Vectors provide not only true L/R balance, but also a host of other pedaling metrics (both currently and in the near future). The Power2Max, OTOH, only measures pseudo-balance. Of course, whether that matters or not is still up in the air, but it is a difference.

+1 for the Vectors. Outside of 2 bad one second data errors over 6000 miles, its been pretty reliable.

I have had my power2max on my tri-bike since last June and I love it and I intend up getting one for my road bike (when I can afford it) to replace my powertap wheel I am using… I agree with jaretj below that chainrings are lot cheaper to replace than the vector pedals will be when either of them inevitably wear out…

Joel

Seems to be about $200 to replace the pedal body.

I would wait until they actually announce pricing for the replacement pedal before making a firm decision because until it it writing from the it not real it is just hearsay…

Joel

http://www.rei.com/item/867648/garmin-vector-replacement-pedal-body-and-assembly
.

IMO…Pedals wear out

Speedplay, yes (although of course parts can be replaced). However, I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a quality Look-style pedal truly wear out.

Hey Andy, sorry to hijack this thread but you must not have seen my other requests. Can I get a copy of your City Hall Drive data set?

Slightly off your initial question, but one thing you can do with your wired powertap (depending on exactly which one) is send it back to powertap and they will upgrade it to wireless with the new G3 internals for $350.

Hey Andy, sorry to hijack this thread but you must not have seen my other requests. Can I get a copy of your City Hall Drive data set?

Sorry, I’ve been looking, but can’t find that spreadsheet. Andy F may still have a copy.

I’ve had my P2M for about a year now. The readings are consistent…the thing just works.

Interesting so it is more expensive than chainrings (at least the last set I bought)… At least it is not the full cost of the vectors…

Joel

And since I have to use speedplay for my bit fit to work (I need the adjustability) that would rule out vectors for me…

Joel