I wanted to share my experience with you simply because I find it interesting. I think that there are too many uncontrolled variables to say for sure what the cause is(sorry, I’m taking a quantitative analysis course right now), but it is interesting to ponder.
One race I do every year is the Ashland Int’l Tri. It is a 1/26/6, but the run is about .5 mile long. Last year I did it in 2:44:xx, and that was when I was training 15+ hours a week gearing up for IMLP. I had a lousy swim, an okay bike, and a pretty good run. This year, I am doing about 5 hours per week(and weigh about 5-10 pounds more), most of which is in the pool, with some running and riding(no more than 2-3 hours total), and I finished the race in 2:48:xx. I PR’d the swim(gotta get a sleeveless wetsuit), went about 3 minutes slower on the bike(due largely to headwinds and traffic on the course), and ran about 1:30 slower, but was intentionally taking it easy.
I also haven’t had as much post-race soreness as I did last year.
So now I am pondering the many and varied reasons why my difference in performance is so small given my drastic change in lifestyle since last year. Is it just that I’m a mediocre triathlete, and my best/worst is a small margin? Or can it be that all that volume is of limited value?
Anyway, I thought some folks might find this interesting.