NY Times Article on Running Economy

Not sure if anyone posted it yet, but there’s an interesting article in the NY Times this morning about running economy. Lots of quotes from Jack Daniels, and a little discussion of economy in cycling too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/fashion/11Best.html?ex=1349841600&en=d866a9b90d89c2f9&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

Maybe your thread will generate more interest: http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=1518197#1518197
.

Good read. Fashion and Style? maybe because of Salazar’s shorts.

Interesting tho’, I’ve often wondered why swimmers practice ~10,000yds/day for a 200m race. Apparently, swimmers just ‘know’ it works. What does it mean for cycling and running, just do more?

Interesting article. 180 steps per minute seems like a really high number, that’s 3 steps per second for those of you without a calculator at your desk. I’m not sure how I would even begin trying to run with that high of a turnover…

They are referring to 180 for *both *legs (90 /leg).

Oh well that would make sense wouldn’t it. I’m just so used to people saying to measure cadence by counting one leg that I didn’t stop to think that 180 is 2x what I run… duh. All I can say is TGIF, the weekend can’t come soon enough!

I’ve often wondered why swimmers practice ~10,000yds/day for a 200m race. Apparently, swimmers just ‘know’ it works. What does it mean for cycling and running, just do more?
It means that even if your race is only a couple of minutes long, you still need to train for hours each day to achieve maximum performance. Oh, wait: that’s already what elite endurance track cyclists and middle distance runners already do…

So if I understand correctly, ‘work longer and harder to do better’, whoa! didn’t see that coming. It’s amazing the insights you pick up on this forum! :wink: