Post #153 of 164 (67 views)
Copy Shortcut
**Re: Do They Dress Like This To Get Chicks (In The Middle East, They Sure Do!)? **In reply to] **Quote | Reply ** I’ll gladly cross that line:
Jesus is in bed fucking the hell out of this chick, he flips her over and starts hitting it from behind. The girl looks up at him and says:
“That was pretty presumptuous of you to just flip me over without saying anything first!” Jesus looks down at her and says:
“Presumptuous… That’s a pretty big word for a 5 year old.”
**mopdahl **
Jul 1, 2005, 1:05 PM
Post #158 of 164 (44 views)
Copy Shortcut
**Re: Do They Dress Like This To Get Chicks (In The Middle East, They Sure Do!)? **In reply to] **Quote | Reply ** And just so that we are equal-opportunity insulting: A priest & a rabbi are walking down the street together and they see a 9 year old boy approaching. The priest looks at the rabbi & says:
“What do ya say we fuck that little boy?”
The rabbi replies:
“Out of what?”
**mopdahl **
Jul 1, 2005, 1:45 PM
Post #162 of 164 (12 views)
Copy Shortcut
**Re: Do They Dress Like This To Get Chicks (In The Middle East, They Sure Do!)? **In reply to] **Quote | Reply ** Yes. I. Am. Q: What’s the difference between onions and hookers?
A: I don’t cry when I chop up hookers.
I agree! Sparticus, the graphics rock!! Oh, and your contribution to the Hottie Thread is second to none (How about an invite to some of those hottie parties.)
How is it possible that you do not see the ironic point of M’s offensive jokes? Of course they were offensive – that was the whole point. My vote is that the award is still yours for obliviously biting on his jokes and, thus, proving his point that BK’s “joke” (which didn’t even elicit the smallest grin from me) could be seen as offensive.
Mopdahl does, perhaps, deserve some sort of an award for setting new records for offensive jokes on this forum. The Buddy Hackett Trophy, maybe?
BTW, I thought GJS’s joke about the Arabs and American on the plane was great!
Other than that, the thread was a bit like Beavis and Butthead. You don’t laugh because they’re funny. You laugh because they’re complete fucking idiots.
If you are in the slightest trying to rationalize the vulgarity of the Mopdahl wack job post then you get VP Jackass. Are you into sex with children too? Do you find the irony satisfying? Some things may not be funny and some things are beyond the pale of human decency. Figure out where the line is you moron.
Anyone that resorts to child molestation jokes in order to get a laugh or to offend is an out and out hack … a wannabe attention getter. No skills. Just play to the old stand-byes.
Jesus and a 5-year old? Where’s the creativity. Lame. Amateurish. Really … all this defending of him? Climb back to your position on the bottom of a gay 69 and stay there.
My post contained minimal content. I did not see the need to list everything stupid in the idiot’s posts (molestation jokes, homophobic jokes, murder/mutilation, etc). Crap, I’ve already devoted more time to it than it deserves.
You’re reading to much into what i left out of my post. Don’t do that.
**My vote is that the award is still yours for obliviously biting on his jokes and, thus, proving his point that BK’s “joke” (which didn’t even elicit the smallest grin from me) could be seen as offensive. **
What was offensive about it? The fact that I criticized their sartorial splendor? Maybe it was a little too subtle.
For an extra 5 points, is there somebody out there who can explain the point that I was trying to make?
Markus, over on the original thread, got the point. I mainly was sticking up for women’s rights, or their lack thereof, over in that part of the world. And poking a little fun, in a later response over the photo, at the whole metrosexual thing.
Well…I thought the tie-in to the metrosexual-scoring stuff that’s going on was humorous I had to do that in a later post on the thread. All of my employees out here in Hawaii have never heard the term, so I had to explain to them what it meant.
You could, quite frankly, have just posted the photo by itself and it would have been funny enough. That first guy just looks goofy. Add in the idea that they might be trying to pick up women and it’s funnier. The social commentary is just gravy.
I had to do that in a later post on the thread. All of my employees out here in Hawaii have never heard the term, so I had to explain to them what it meant.